Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767972

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Healthcare workers (HCWs) wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) experience physiological strain that can impair motor and psychological functions, potentially affecting patient care. We assessed the effects of heat exposure on maximal strength and risk-taking behavior amongst PPE-wearing HCWs and the efficacy of ice slurry to alleviate adverse effects. METHODS: 17 HCWs completed two experimental trials in a crossover design, consuming 5 g × kg-1 of body mass of ambient drink (AMB) or ice slurry (ICE) before donning PPE and undergoing 2-h of simulated decontamination exercise (wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT): 25.9 ± 0.8 °C, PPE microenvironment WBGT: 29.1 ± 2.1 °C). Body core temperature (Tc), heart rate (HR), chest skin temperature (Tsk), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), thermal sensation (RTS), maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), risk-taking behavior (Balloon Analogue Risk-Taking task; BART) and salivary cortisol were assessed. RESULTS: Pre- to post-drinking ∆Tc was greater in ICE (-0.2 ± 0.1 °C) than AMB (-0.0 ± 0.1 °C, P = 0.003). Post-drinking RTS was lower in ICE (2.7 ± 1.2) than AMB (4.1 ± 0.4, P < 0.001). ICE and AMB had similar Tc and HR (both P > 0.05), but Tsk was lower in ICE than AMB (P = 0.049). A lower MVC (30.3 ± 6.7 kg vs 27.4 ± 4.9 kg, P = 0.001) and higher BART adjusted total pump count (472 ± 170 pumps vs 615 ± 174 pumps, P = 0.017) was observed pre- to post-trial in AMB but absent in ICE (both P > 0.05). Salivary cortisol was similar between trials (P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Heat-exposed PPE-wearing HCWs had impaired maximal strength and elevated risk-taking behavior. This may increase the risk of avoidable workplace accidents that can jeopardize HCWs and patient care. Ice slurry ingestion alleviated these heat-related impairments, suggesting its potential as an ergogenic aid.

2.
J Sport Health Sci ; 13(2): 233-244, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37678507

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Excessive heat exposure can lead to hyperthermia in humans, which impairs physical performance and disrupts cognitive function. While heat is a known physiological stressor, it is unclear how severe heat stress affects brain physiology and function. METHODS: Eleven healthy participants were subjected to heat stress from prolonged exercise or warm water immersion until their rectal temperatures (Tre) attained 39.5°C, inducing exertional or passive hyperthermia, respectively. In a separate trial, blended ice was ingested before and during exercise as a cooling strategy. Data were compared to a control condition with seated rest (normothermic). Brain temperature (Tbr), cerebral perfusion, and task-based brain activity were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. RESULTS: Tbr in motor cortex was found to be tightly regulated at rest (37.3°C ± 0.4°C (mean ± SD)) despite fluctuations in Tre. With the development of hyperthermia, Tbr increases and dovetails with the rising Tre. Bilateral motor cortical activity was suppressed during high-intensity plantarflexion tasks, implying a reduced central motor drive in hyperthermic participants (Tre = 38.5°C ± 0.1°C). Global gray matter perfusion and regional perfusion in sensorimotor cortex were reduced with passive hyperthermia. Executive function was poorer under a passive hyperthermic state, and this could relate to compromised visual processing as indicated by the reduced activation of left lateral-occipital cortex. Conversely, ingestion of blended ice before and during exercise alleviated the rise in both Tre and Tbr and mitigated heat-related neural perturbations. CONCLUSION: Severe heat exposure elevates Tbr, disrupts motor cortical activity and executive function, and this can lead to impairment of physical and cognitive performance.


Subject(s)
Body Temperature , Heat Stress Disorders , Humans , Body Temperature/physiology , Temperature , Executive Function , Ice , Fever , Brain , Exercise/physiology
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153079

ABSTRACT

The need for healthcare workers (HCWs) to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic heightens their risk of thermal stress. We assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of HCWs from India and Singapore regarding PPE usage and heat stress when performing treatment and care activities. One hundred sixty-five HCWs from India (n = 110) and Singapore (n = 55) participated in a survey. Thirty-seven HCWs from Singapore provided thermal comfort ratings before and after ice slurry ingestion. Differences in responses between India and Singapore HCWs were compared. A p-value cut-off of 0.05 depicted statistical significance. Median wet-bulb globe temperature was higher in India (30.2 °C (interquartile range [IQR] 29.1-31.8 °C)) than in Singapore (22.0 °C (IQR 18.8-24.8 °C)) (p < 0.001). Respondents from both countries reported thirst (n = 144, 87%), excessive sweating (n = 145, 88%), exhaustion (n = 128, 78%), and desire to go to comfort zones (n = 136, 84%). In Singapore, reports of air-conditioning at worksites (n = 34, 62%), dedicated rest area availability (n = 55, 100%), and PPE removal during breaks (n = 54, 98.2%) were higher than in India (n = 27, 25%; n = 46, 42%; and n = 66, 60%, respectively) (p < 0.001). Median thermal comfort rating improved from 2 (IQR 1-2) to 0 (IQR 0-1) after ice slurry ingestion in Singapore (p < 0.001). HCWs are cognizant of the effects of heat stress but might not adopt best practices due to various constraints. Thermal stress management is better in Singapore than in India. Ice slurry ingestion is shown to be practical and effective in promoting thermal comfort. Adverse effects of heat stress on productivity and judgment of HCWs warrant further investigation.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Health Personnel , Hot Temperature , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral , Stress, Physiological , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapore/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Front Physiol ; 10: 71, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30842739

ABSTRACT

Background: A majority of high profile international sporting events, including the coming 2020 Tokyo Olympics, are held in warm and humid conditions. When exercising in the heat, the rapid rise of body core temperature (T c ) often results in an impairment of exercise capacity and performance. As such, heat mitigation strategies such as aerobic fitness (AF), heat acclimation/acclimatization (HA), pre-exercise cooling (PC) and fluid ingestion (FI) can be introduced to counteract the debilitating effects of heat strain. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of these mitigation strategies using magnitude-based inferences. Methods: A computer-based literature search was performed up to 24 July 2018 using the electronic databases: PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. After applying a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 118 studies were selected for evaluation. Each study was assessed according to the intervention's ability to lower T c before exercise, attenuate the rise of T c during exercise, extend T c at the end of exercise and improve endurance. Weighted averages of Hedges' g were calculated for each strategy. Results: PC (g = 1.01) was most effective in lowering T c before exercise, followed by HA (g = 0.72), AF (g = 0.65), and FI (g = 0.11). FI (g = 0.70) was most effective in attenuating the rate of rise of T c , followed by HA (g = 0.35), AF (g = -0.03) and PC (g = -0.46). In extending T c at the end of exercise, AF (g = 1.11) was most influential, followed by HA (g = -0.28), PC (g = -0.29) and FI (g = -0.50). In combination, AF (g = 0.45) was most effective at favorably altering Tc, followed by HA (g = 0.42), PC (g = 0.11) and FI (g = 0.09). AF (1.01) was also found to be most effective in improving endurance, followed by HA (0.19), FI (-0.16) and PC (-0.20). Conclusion: AF was found to be the most effective in terms of a strategy's ability to favorably alter T c , followed by HA, PC and lastly, FI. Interestingly, a similar ranking was observed in improving endurance, with AF being the most effective, followed by HA, FI, and PC. Knowledge gained from this meta-analysis will be useful in allowing athletes, coaches and sport scientists to make informed decisions when employing heat mitigation strategies during competitions in hot environments.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...