Diagnostic value of CA19.9, circulating tumour DNA and circulating tumour cells in patients with solid pancreatic tumours.

BACKGROUND: The direct comparison of CA19.9, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has never been performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumours (SPTs). METHODS: We included 68 patients with a SPT referred for EUS-FNA. CTCs were analysed using size-based platform and ctDNA using digital PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were evaluated for each marker and their combination. RESULTS: SPTs corresponded to 58 malignant tumours (52 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) and 6 others) and 10 benign lesions. The sensitivity and specificity for PA diagnosis were 73% and 88% for EUS-FNA, 67% and 80% for CTC, 65% and 75% for ctDNA and 79% and 93% for CA19.9, respectively. The positivity of at least 2 markers was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 91%, respectively. CtDNA was the only marker associated with overall survival (median 5.2 months for ctDNA+ vs 11.0 months for ctDNA-, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CA19.9 alone and in combination with ctDNA and/or CTC analysis may represent an efficient method for diagnosing PA in patients with SPTs. Further studies including a larger cohort of patients with both malignant and benign lesions will be necessary to confirm these promising results.

Diagnostic impact of routine colonoscopy following acute diverticulitis: A multicenter study in 808 patients and controls.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of acute diverticulitis is mainly based on clinical, biological and computed tomography (CT)-scan findings. Elective colonoscopy is recommended after medical treatment, to rule out another diagnosis and to detect associated conditions; however, the relevance of this recommendation has been questioned. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2011, we retrospectively identified in three referral centers the consecutive patients whom underwent a colonoscopy after the medical treatment of a CT scan-proven acute diverticulitis episode. We excluded from the analysis patients with haematochezia or recent change in bowel habits. Sex and age-matched asymptomatic patients undergoing a screening colonoscopy were chosen as a control group. We collected and compared the results of colonoscopy and histological findings in both groups. RESULTS: We matched 404 patients whom underwent a colonoscopy after an episode of acute diverticulitis with 404 control patients. Their mean age was 60.9 years, with 59% being women. Colorectal adenoma, advanced adenoma and cancer detection rates in acute diverticulitis patients were 12.1%, 2.7% and 0.25%, respectively; versus 14.6% (p = 0.35), 6.7% (p = 0.01) and 0.25% respectively, in control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis rates for adenomas and for colorectal cancer during a colonoscopy scheduled after acute diverticulitis were similar than those of control patients undergoing a screening colonoscopy, while the detection rate of advanced adenomas was lower. We suggest that colonoscopy should be indicated only in selected patients, i.e. those presenting with reasonable doubt on initial CT-scan, those with alarm symptoms, and those with identified risk factors for colorectal cancer.

Lack of correlation between morbid obesity and severe gastroesophageal reflux disease in candidates for bariatric surgery: results of a large prospective study.

The relationship between obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a subject of debate. In this large series of 250 morbidly obese patients, all candidates for bariatric surgery, we have shown the very low prevalence of severe GERD and neither Barrett's esophagus nor esophageal adenocarcinoma was detected. Moreover, no relationship was found between GERD and not only BMI but also abdominal diameter.

Factors associated with diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding by video capsule enteroscopy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Capsule enteroscopy (CE) is the best noninvasive tool to explore the entire small bowel of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB); it has a diagnostic yield of 40%-80%. However, little is known about the factors associated with a diagnosis of OGIB by CE. METHODS: We analyzed data from 911 consecutive patients who underwent CE for OGIB from January 2004 to January 2010. Results from upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy examinations were negative in all patients. CE findings were recorded. Features of patients that were associated with diagnosis of OGIB by CE were identified by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Based on CE, 509 patients (56%) had a confirmed lesion responsible for the OGIB: 203 had disease of the small bowel (22%), 88 had ulcerations (10%), 70 had tumors (8%), 24 had varices (2%), 6 had diverticula (0.5%), and 118 had what appeared to be bleeding lesions of the esophagus or stomach (10.6%) or colon (2%). Factors independently associated with a diagnosis of OGIB by CE were age >60 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.2), male sex, history of overt bleeding (OR, 3.8), and current hospitalization (OR, 1.4). Women were less likely to be diagnosed with OGIB by CE (OR, 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: A history of overt bleeding is the factor most strongly associated with a diagnosis of OGIB by CE. Male sex, age >60 years, and inpatient status were also independent predictors of positive diagnosis by CE.