ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The Saudi Board of Emergency Medicine (SBEM) is required to assign educators including program directors to supervise their residents. These educators may impact the residents' academic and clinical performances. After thorough review, we noticed that the current literature lacks information about the direct influence of emergency medicine educators on their residents' academic and clinical performances. The main purpose of this study is to assess the residents' confidence level, and to measure the program directors' satisfaction of the residents' performances during their SBEM training years in Riyadh hospitals. METHODS: This concurrent mixed-methods study was conducted in nine training hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during the 2021-2022 academic year. For the quantitative aspect, a cross-sectional survey was used, based on a questionnaire administered to postgraduate year (PGY)-2 to PGY-4 SBEM residents (n=120) using a nonprobability convenient sampling technique. The survey aimed to assess residents' confidence in their academic and clinical performance, influenced by their educators. A Likert scale with a total of 25 items, covering the seven roles of the CANMEDs framework, was employed. This assessment utilized a published tool called the In-Training Evaluation Report. For the qualitative aspect, program directors' perspectives were gathered through one-on-one unstructured interviews (n=9), guided by theoretical saturation. A purposive sampling technique was employed to select program directors. The interview tool collected demographic data, including gender, years of experience, and training hospital, and included 17 open-ended questions to explore program directors' opinions. RESULTS: The result of mixed methods showed that both quantitative and qualitative data sets were divergent with all independent variables (resident's age, gender, and training level) with the exception of the training hospital which was convergent. Thus, the residents' confidence toward their academic and clinical performances induced by their institutional educators was high. However, the program directors indicated changes that related to residents' training level. CONCLUSION: The residents' confidence toward their academic and clinical performance induced by their institutional educators was high. The educators had a great deal of influence over the academic and clinical performance of the residents. However, the program directors thought there were some issues with the performance of the residents. Most of the program directors also believed that several influential factors that may have affected the residents' overall performance include stress and receipt of constructive feedback.
ABSTRACT
Background and objective Seminar-based workshops envision an active learning environment that creates opportunities for faculty to learn how to become effective workshop facilitators themselves. In this study, we employed a mixed-methods design focusing on an in-depth analysis of the data to examine the impact of the competencies and characteristics of a workshop facilitator on faculty development activities and programs. Methodology This study involved 159 faculty members and was conducted via a web-based survey and 13 in-depth interviews. Results The Pearson correlation coefficients between the three effectiveness ratings showed that all three correlations are significant at the 0.01 level, which signifies a statistically significant relationship between the three variables. The strongest relationship is between facilitator knowledge and facilitator communication, followed by that between facilitator communication and facilitator attitude, and between facilitator knowledge and facilitator attitude. This suggests that the three effectiveness ratings are positively correlated. Qualitatively, four themes emerged in our study: attributes of a good facilitator, participant engagement's role, feedback's impact, and workshop organization challenges. Knowledge, communication, and attitude were identified as effective facilitator characteristics, with knowledge being the most crucial. Conclusions Our findings highlight the importance of enhancing participant understanding, providing timely feedback, and bridging theory to practice. Ultimately, effective facilitators strike a balance in terms of knowledge, communication, and attitude, acknowledging the importance of participant engagement and overcoming workshop challenges. We believe our findings will help inform the revision of the current faculty development programs and the development of such endeavors in the future at institutions of higher education.
ABSTRACT
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the application of faculty to stimulate the critical thinking and deep analysis of their students through instructional practice including lecture design, assessment structure, and assignment instructions. Methods: Faculty from multiple different health colleges at Saudi Arabia were asked to respond to survey items about the activities they use in their classrooms with regards to designing lectures, assessment structures, and instructional assignments. A correlation analysis was performed to determine if the level of applied critical thinking and deep analysis that is stimulated by faculty members were statistically related between designing lectures, assessment structure, and instructional assignments. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was also performed to determine if there were significant differences based on the demographic characteristics of the participants and level of applied critical thinking and deep analysis. Results: A correlational analysis revealed that the mean score for designing lectures was 67.276, following by a mean score of 65.233 for instructional assignment and 64.688 for assessment structure. The result of the ANOVA showed that there was a significant difference in the perceptions of the participants between designing lectures, assessment structure, and instructional assignment (p<0.05). Conclusion: The participants applied critical thinking and deep analysis when they design their lectures more than assessments and instructional assignments. They had the flexibility to stimulate critical thinking during the lecture activities. In contrast, this flexibility was limited when they were structuring the assessment as they had instructions to consider and were required to provide a rubric with unified key answer which is a mandatory requirement from the assessment department. This is due to the nature of high level of critical thinking answers that lead to high subjectivity in student responses.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Instructional methods that offer students' opportunity for engagement are essential to develop an active learning environment. This paper aims (1) to assess whether the use of an Audience Response System (ARS) during anatomy and physiology lectures improves students' engagement, knowledge retention and academic achievement and (2) to evaluate the feasibility of introducing ARS as a formative tool from both instructors' and students' perspectives. Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted across ten lectures for the second-year Pre-Applied Medical Science (PAMS) and Pre-Medical (PMED) students at the College of Sciences and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The ARS was integrated into five lectures, whereas the remaining were conducted without ARS. A comparison of the immediate post-lecture and prior laboratory session quiz scores between the lectures with and without ARS was performed using an independent sample t-test. An online survey was completed by the students as well as informal feedback was taken from the instructors to assess ARS usefulness. Results: A total of 65 PMAS and 126 PMED students participated in the study. Students achieved significantly better scores for ARS lectures than non-ARS lectures: PAMS (p 0.038) and PMED (p 0.018). Students and instructors agreed that ARS was easy to use, allowing students to engage and actively participate in the teaching process by responding to questions and receiving instant and anonymous feedback about their learning progress. Conclusion: Employing suitable interactive teaching methods facilitates students' learning and improves their retention of knowledge. Students and instructors positively view the ARS strategy as a means to promote learning in a traditional lecture setting. Increased practice on how to integrate its use into classrooms could lead to further utilization.
ABSTRACT
Since the 1970s, the definition of faculty development has evolved from improving teaching skills and classroom performance to a full range of activities involving teaching, leadership, mentorship of students, and impacting institutional culture. Unfortunately, in many educational programs, the focus of faculty development is still on classroom performance and research activities. This is troubling given the increased competitive nature of higher education in general, and even medical education, to attract the best students. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how the Kirkpatrick model can be used as a framework for the development, implementation, and management of a comprehensive faculty development program. An important gap exists within the academic literature regarding a lack of discussion and analysis about how faculty development can be implemented in a way that helps healthcare faculty improve their skills in all areas of academic performance. At the same time, there is a lack of discussion and analysis about the need for medical schools to align faculty development with larger institutional goals and outcomes. The discussion included in this article serves to begin the process of filling that gap within the academic literature by demonstrating that the Kirkpatrick model can be used to implement and manage faculty development programs in which there is an institutional focus rather than an individual focus. By focusing on faculty development that is aligned with larger institutional goals, medical schools can be more competitive and better serve the future healthcare professionals they are training.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many studies are available in the literature about e-health in Saudi Arabia, however, data is limited to a few organizations and does not necessarily reflect the current and potential use of e-health for health care organizations in the country. This study aimed to determine the level of awareness of Saudi medical students of the internet-based health-related information seeking and developing to support health services and significant predictors of their practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 440 medical students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, was conducted, during October/November 2019, using a previously validated questionnaire, to assess: (1) knowledge in three domains; e-health definition (13 statements), fields of application of e-health (8 statements), methods of using e-health (7 statements), (2) attitude toward using e-health (8 statements) and (3) reported practice of e-health in medical training (5 statements). A scoring system was used to calculate the total and percentage score of knowledge, attitude, and practice for each student. Multiple regression analysis was applied to identify predictors of e-health practice. Significance was considered at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 440 medical students, the majority were females (55.7%) and from families whose monthly income was more than 10,000SR (82.8%). Overall knowledge about e-health was unsatisfactory (percentage mean score, PMS = 71.6%), with only 43.6% of students reporting a satisfactory level. However, this level was satisfactory for fields of application (Percentage mean score-PMS = 76.6%) and unsatisfactory for the definition of e-health (PMS = 70.7%) and methods of its use (PMS = 65.7%) domains. The overall attitude towards e-health use was positive (PMS = 82.3%), with nearly three-quarters of students (73.4%) reporting a positive attitude. Generally, a good level of practice of e-health was reported by students (PMS = 84.3%), with more than three-quarters of students (78.4%) reporting good practice. Adjusting for age, gender, stream, educational grade, and family monthly income, good practice was significantly predicted with higher knowledge (t = 2.22, p = 0.03) and attitude (t = 2.11, p = 0.04) scores. CONCLUSION: This study provides basic information regarding medical students' level of awareness of internet-based health-related information seeking and developing to support health services. More resources should be directed to elevate medical students' knowledge and to motivate them to practice e-health using the available tools.
