Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 96(1): 12285, 2024 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38451258

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents an infertility problem that is usually difficult to treat. Such patients usually have testicular biopsy of germ cell aplasia or spermatogenic arrest. In recent decades, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) had been studied thoroughly and proved safe and effective regarding their capability for trans-differentiation into different cell types. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MSCs local intratesticular injection in induction of spermatogenesis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The current study included 87 infertile non-obstructive azoospermic patients. Clinical assessment and repeated semen analysis with centrifugation were done to confirm azoospermia. Karyotyping and AZF study were done. Some of the patients had previous testicular biopsy proving a lack of sperm in the testes. Single intratesticular injection of purified MSCs suspension was done. RESULTS: 20.7% of patients showed sperm in their semen after variable period of time. Hormonal profile among treated patients showed significant improvement regardless success of treatment. Also most of the treated patients appreciated the improvement of their sexual function and libido. CONCLUSIONS: Bone marrow derived MSCs could be a new hope and therapeutic modality for treatment of refractory cases of NOA.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/therapy , Semen , Testis/pathology , Spermatozoa/pathology
2.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 95(4): 11669, 2023 Nov 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990987

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: to assess safety and efficacy of autologous mesenchymal bone marrow stem cell injection in penile cavernosal tissue for erectile dysfunction therapy in diabetic men. METHODS: The subjects of this study were diabetic men suffering erectile dysfunction, non-responding to maximum dose of oral PDE5I. Mesenchymal bone marrow stem cells were aspirated and injected after preparation in both corpora cavernosa at 3, 9 o'clock position. Erectile function was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function and penile Doppler study, before and after 6 months after injection. RESULTS: 4 patients out of 10 achieve hard erection adequate for satisfactory coitus, and 2 patients achieved penile hardness with addition of pharmacological therapy with sildenafil 100mg. Peak systolic velocity increased significantly in 4 patients (2 arteriogenic and 2 mixed erectile dysfunction), from 12∼22 cm/s to 32∼69 cm/s. Variations in end-diastolic velocity increased substantially in 2 patients with venogenic insufficiency alone at follow-up from 4∼5 cm /s to -4∼-3 cm/s. CONCLUSIONS: Despite promising stem cell treatment efficacy for patients with erectile dysfunction, more clinical studies and researches are still warranted.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Erectile Dysfunction , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Male , Humans , Erectile Dysfunction/therapy , Erectile Dysfunction/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , Penile Erection , Penis
3.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 95(3): 11524, 2023 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37668556

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The rate of success of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treating urinary tract stones is high, and the procedure is growing in popularity. The routine use of ureteral access sheath (UAS) remains somewhat controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of employing UAS during flexible ureteroscopy for treating renal stones ≥ 2 cm. METHODS: This retrospective study was accomplished from January 2021 to February 2023. From 495 consecutives flexible ureteroscopies, 112 patients had renal stones ≥ 2 cm (60 patients with the use of UAS and 52 patients without). The stone-free status was verified after 8 weeks of operation. RESULTS: The average diameter of the renal stones in non-UAS or UAS treated groups was 22.5 mm and 22.6, respectively. None of the groups differed significantly in terms of stone side, stone size, stone position, or Hounsfield unite but there was significant difference (p < 0.001) among two groups as regard pre-operative stenting (cases with UAS had 23.3% pre-operative stenting). CONCLUSIONS: It is not always necessary to use UAS in conjunction with flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy to treat renal calculi bigger than or equal two cm. Without the assistance of UAS, the surgery may be carried out successfully and safely.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi , Ureter , Ureteral Calculi , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Ureteroscopy/methods , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Kidney Calculi/etiology , Ureteroscopes , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...