Evaluating a Modified Use of the Kaiser Permanente Early-onset Sepsis Risk Calculator to Reduce Antibiotic Exposure: a Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) remains an important disease entity due to very serious adverse outcomes if left untreated. Lack of diagnostic tools in identifying healthy from diseased neonates, and clinicians' fear of the missing positive-culture sepsis babies, or babies with clinical sepsis have led to overtreating and unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Kaiser Permanente EONS risk calculator is an internally validated tool that can predict EONS. This sepsis risk calculator (SRC) classifies neonates into three subgroups: (1) ill-appearing, (2) equivocal and (3) well-appearing. We propose a modification to this tool that aims to use it solely for well-appearing babies. This modification represents a more conservative approach to decrease antibiotic exposure and offers an alternative for those hesitant to fully implement this tool. METHODS: This is a dual-centre retrospective study where data were extracted from the electronic medical records. Our primary outcome was to validate the modified use of the SRC with a two-by-two table. Specificity, negative predictive value and expected antibiotic reduction were used to evaluate the tool's feasibility. RESULT: Among 770 babies suspected of EONS, the feasibility of the modified use was tested. The expected antibiotic exposure reduction rate on the modification was 40.4% overall. The proposed modification resulted in a specificity and negative predictive value of 99.28% (95% CI: 97.92% to 99.85%) and 99.5% (95% CI: 99% to 99.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The modified use of the sepsis risk calculator has shown that it can safely reduce antibiotic exposure in well-appearing babies. The modified use is used as a 'rule out' test that can identify very low risk of EONS babies, and safely minimise antibiotic exposure. Further prospective studies are needed to examine the efficacy of this use, and quality improvement projects are required to evaluate its applicability in different clinical settings.

Survival and Predictors of Mortality of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Newborns at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Background Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a condition where abdominal contents protrude into the chest due to defects in the diaphragm muscle. It is considered an emergency that needs urgent intervention to prevent further complications or death. Our study aimed to estimate survival and evaluate predictors of mortality in newborns with CDH using available prediction tools in the literature. Methods This retrospective cohort study included neonates with CDH in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, from 2000 to 2021. Prevalence, demographics, and clinical characteristics were compared between surviving and deceased infants. C-statistics were used to measure the area under the curve for the prenatal and postnatal predictor tools, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results Between 2000 and 2021, 45 neonates with CDH were included (six per 10,000 inborn live births). The mortality rate was 51.1%. The differences in demographics were not significant among surviving and deceased patients. One prenatal predictor tool, the lung-to-head ratio, was found to be significant; in addition, three postnatal predictor tools of mortality, SNAP-II, CDHSG-probability survival, and Brindle Score, had the highest concordance (C) statistics of 0.8, 0.79, and 0.8, respectively. Conclusion Although the incidence of CDH was found to be higher in our study compared to global statistics, our mortality rates correspond with international figures. The most significant differences between predictors and prediction models of mortality were lung-to-head ratio prenatally, SNAP-II, CDHSG-probability survival, and Brindle Score postnatally. Further multicentered studies are recommended with a larger sample size.

Effects of intentional delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of intentional delivery (ID) over expectant management (EM) in pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation on maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Science Citation Index; contacted experts and checked reference lists of relevant studies. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials in all languages. RESULTS: Five randomized trials were included and 488 subjects were analyzed. Overall, the results showed significant heterogeneity. Maternal infection as well as respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) & neonatal sepsis (NS) were not different between the two groups. Neonatal death, however, was significantly higher (risk ratio: 5.81; 95% CI: 1.35-25.08; p = 0.03) in the ID group after excluding studies that gave antenatal steroids. Incidence of cesarean section was significantly higher in the intentional delivery group, as well (risk ratio: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.02-1.80; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, ID in pregnancies complicated with PPROM between 28 and 34 weeks carries some maternal and neonatal risks with no added benefits. Thus, this treatment should not be considered as an option for women with PPROM before 34 weeks of gestation in the absence of other indications for early delivery.