Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 16(4): e58117, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741803

ABSTRACT

Symmetrical peripheral gangrene (SPG) is a rare yet severe condition characterized by peripheral ischemic lesions without significant vascular occlusion. Its clinical presentation includes peripheral cyanosis, mottling, and symmetrical ischemia of distal limbs, often progressing to gangrene. Recent years have seen a rise in SPG cases, with mortality rates ranging from 40% to 90%. The condition is associated with systemic diseases, such as sepsis, vasculitis, and coagulopathy. DIC frequently complicates SPG, reflecting a disturbed procoagulant-anticoagulant balance and depletion of natural anticoagulants. While vasopressor therapy, particularly high-dose administration, has been implicated in SPG pathogenesis due to sustained vasoconstriction or idiosyncratic responses, recent evidence suggests it may not be the underlying cause. Studies indicate a low incidence of ischemic limb necrosis associated with high-dose vasopressors, with DIC and shock liver potentially explaining limb ischemia instead. The characteristic temporal interval between the onset of shock liver and limb ischemic necrosis suggests a more complex pathophysiology. The role of infectious agents, such as bacteria and viruses, in SPG pathogenesis is under investigation, with both direct vascular invasion and immune-mediated mechanisms proposed. Diagnosis involves ruling out other causes of acral gangrene through clinical examination, laboratory tests, imaging studies, and biopsy. Treatment strategies aim to halt disease progression, eliminate causative factors, and prevent complications. While anticoagulants, vasodilators, and adjunctive therapies like hyperbaric oxygen show promise, the efficacy of interventions varies, emphasizing the need for individualized management. Notably, hemoadsorption has emerged as a promising treatment, demonstrating significant improvement in SPG cases. Amputation remains a last resort option in irreversible cases. Early recognition and multidisciplinary management are crucial for improving outcomes. Further research is needed to better understand SPG's etiology and develop effective treatments through collaborative efforts.

2.
Cureus ; 15(10): e47823, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38021656

ABSTRACT

Objective This study aims to assess the knowledge and attitudes toward clinical trial (CT) participation among the adult population in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Material and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among the population of the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed among the general population using an online survey. Results A total of 334 participants completed the questionnaire. Participants' ages ranged from 18 to 65 years, with a mean age of 31.2 ± 13.9 years, 56.6% of whom were males, 42.2% were employed, 29.6% were students, and 23.1% were unemployed. Surprisingly, only a small percentage of respondents (7.5%) were requested to participate in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), of which the majority did partake. Additionally, 25.4% of participants believe CTs are used to evaluate new drugs; others believe that CTs are used to understand diseases and human behavior. The data show that most participants believe that CTs improve patient care, welfare, and society. Also, participants were more likely to take part if they were aware of the study's purpose and findings and were given more time to consider their options. Conclusion Participants believed that the biggest obstacle was a lack of knowledge of CTs. It is crucial to educate patients more about CTs. Multimodal strategies such as improved patient-provider communication and online information for trial information sharing may be effective in boosting knowledge and CT recruitment.

3.
Cureus ; 15(3): e36831, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37123744

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:  Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition caused by the reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus. Heartburn, chest discomfort, and regurgitation are the main symptoms. Medications, surgical procedures, and lifestyle modification are considered treatment options. Fasting is believed to be one of the lifestyle modifications that helps minimize GERD symptoms. Muslims abstain from eating, drinking, and smoking from dawn until dusk. The objectives of our study were to investigate the relationship between fasting and GERD symptoms and evaluate how fasting affects GERD symptoms in Saudi Arabia. METHODOLOGY: This was a longitudinal study that selected GERD patients for its consecutive sampling. The patients answered the questionnaires at two separate times: once during Ramadan and once after Ramadan. A validated gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) self-administered survey was used. RESULT: After Ramadan, heartburn symptoms significantly decreased, particularly when lying down. Overall, the 45-point heartburn score decreased from 17.9 during Ramadan to 14.3 thereafter. The regurgitation score decreased from 12.3 during Ramadan to 9.9 after fasting, with statistical significance (P = .049). Although satisfaction was much higher after Ramadan (17% vs. 15.1%), there was no statistical significance (P = .422), and 45.3% of the patients were satisfied with their health state during Ramadan compared to 34% after Ramadan. There was no relationship between the severity of GERD symptoms before or after fasting and the type of food, the timing of eating, or the amount of food consumed. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that Ramadan fasting may improve GERD symptoms. However, more studies are required to validate these results and comprehend the underlying mechanisms.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...