Enhancing Diabetes Care in LMICs: Insights from a Multinational Consensus.

The International Cardio-Metabolic Forum held a plenary session to establish a multinational consensus on the challenges faced in diabetes management within lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) and their potential solutions. Stakeholders, including patients, family/caretakers, healthcare professionals, and healthcare policymakers & organizations, participated in discussions. The audience of 280 doctors from 15 different countries (Pakistan, Qatar, Sri Lanka, Kenya, Myanmar, Georgia, Nigeria, Philippines, Uzbekistan, Iraq, Tanzania, Cambodia, Kazakhstan, South Sudan and Libya) was divided into 4 groups led by Group Leaders to represent each stakeholder group. Questionnaires addressing key challenges and solutions specific to each group were used to facilitate consensus development. Participants voted on relevant options based on their clinical experience. SLIDO software was used for polling, generating separate results for each group. The insights shared by healthcare professionals highlighted the importance of improving medication accessibility and cost-effectiveness for patients, emphasizing the need for adherence to treatment plans and lifestyle modifications. The significance of balanced nutrition with low glycemic index food for enhancing quality of life was recognized. Caregivers of diabetic patients with comorbidities face increasing demands for care, particularly in relation to age-related milestones. Healthcare professionals emphasized the challenges posed by cultural beliefs and health awareness, underscoring the importance of teamwork and early referral for managing comorbidities. Healthcare policymakers need to focus on disease education, awareness programs, screening guidelines, and advocacy for community and clinical screening. By addressing these challenges, a more comprehensive and effective approach to diabetes management can be achieved in LMICs, ultimately improving outcomes for individuals with diabetes.

Relative timing of near-field and far-field electrograms can determine the tachyarrhythmia site of origin.

BACKGROUND: Despite improving algorithms, inappropriate shocks for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) still occur in a significant number of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). This makes the discovery of novel discriminators that use existing ICD hardware an attractive proposition. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the delay of activation onset from the device-detected, far-field electrogram (EGM) to the near-field, bipole EGM would allow the differentiation of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) from SVTs. METHODS: Proof of principle was demonstrated by rapid pacing in the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle in healthy patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation procedures (n = 17). Using real-life ICD recordings, the equivalent measurements were made in a derivation cohort (n = 26) and cutoff predictive values obtained. Finally, the selected values were validated in a separate group of recordings (n = 82). RESULTS: In healthy patients, significant differences in the far-field to near-field EGM activation onsets were observed between right atrial (14.7 ± 2.7 ms), right ventricular (36.3 ± 8 ms), and left ventricular (57.8 ± 10.3 ms; P < .001) pacing. In the derivation ICD cohort, the median far-field to near-field onset delay was significantly shorter in SVT (24.5 ms; interquartile range, 15.3-47.5 ms) than in VT (118.5 ms; interquartile range, 102.5-131.5 ms) (P < .001). Using a cutoff of 100 ms in the validation cohort, SVT was successfully discriminated from VT with a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and a negative predictive value of 94.2%. CONCLUSION: The delay between far-field and near-field EGMs offers a potential new discrimination tool to reduce inappropriate ICD therapies and aid interpretation of single-lead device tracings.

Increased Incidence of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Advanced Cancer and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies in patients with a diagnosis of cancer. BACKGROUND: Cardiac disease and cancer are prevalent conditions and share common predisposing factors. No studies have assessed the impact of cancer on the burden of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with cancer and ICDs. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with an ICD and cancer who were followed from January 2007 to June 2015. Rates of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) before and after patients' cancers were diagnosed were evaluated by searching device data collection systems. Rates were adjusted for length of follow-up and compared using the Wilcoxon test, and times to first therapy following diagnosis (stages I to III vs. IV) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. RESULTS: Among 1,598 patients with an ICD, 209 patients (13.1%) had a pathological diagnosis of malignancy; and in 102 patients (6.4%), malignancy was diagnosed following device insertion. After the diagnosis of cancer, 32% of patients experienced VT/VF over 23.2 ± 23.6 months, and the frequency of arrhythmic events was significantly increased after the diagnosis (1.19 ± 0.32 vs. 0.12 ± 0.21 episodes per month, respectively; p = 0.03). The incidence of VT/VF was markedly higher in patients with stage IV cancer than in those with earlier stages (p = 0.03). In this group, the incidence of VT/VF was 41.2%, with an average of 7.2 ± 18.5 events per patient, all of whom received ICD shocks. The rate of ICD deactivation in stage IV patients was 35.3%. Inappropriate therapies occurred in 13.7%, and atrial fibrillation was the most frequent cause. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients who had received ICDs developed ventricular arrhythmia after a diagnosis of cancer. The incidence was significantly higher in those with advanced metastatic disease. Findings underscore the need to discuss ICD management as part of end-of-life care.

Unipolar voltage threshold of 5.0 mV is optimal to localize critical isthmuses in post-infarction patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Bipolar voltage mapping is useful to delineate post-infarct endocardial scar and guide ablation of ischemic VT. The role of unipolar mapping is not yet well defined. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between electrophysiological findings in patients with ischemic VT and unipolar voltage maps using different cut-offs. METHODS: We included 10 patients (age 67 ± 7 years, ejection fraction 33 ± 10%) with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing catheter ablation for recurrent VT. Patients with right-sided VTs were excluded. In all patients a unipolar voltage map was constructed during right ventricular pacing. Ablation was performed guided by activation and entrainment mapping in hemodynamically stable VTs and by pace-mapping and abnormal (late/split/fractionated) potentials in unstable VTs. Subsequently, the unipolar voltage maps were analyzed off-line using cutoffs from 1.0 to 8.0 mV and correlated with the isthmus sites. RESULTS: A total of 17 sustained VTs were induced in the 10 patients and non-inducibility of the clinical VT was achieved in 90% of patients by endocardial ablation. The optimal cutoff was 5.0 mV. By using this value, the mean surface area of abnormal unipolar voltage was 43.8% and 95% of all VT isthmuses were located within the area of scar, as well as 81% of abnormal potentials. In addition, 71% of isthmuses were at less than 1cm from the scar border. CONCLUSION: Unipolar voltage mapping showed good correlation with areas of isthmuses and abnormal electrograms in patients with scar-related VT, with a cut-off of 5.0 mV allowing the best delineation of ablation targets.

New-onset atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: identification of advanced interatrial block is key.

AIMS: A significant proportion of patients develop atrial fibrillation (AF) following cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical atrial flutter (AFl). The objective of this study was to assess whether the presence of advanced interatrial block (aIAB) was associated with an elevated risk of AF after CTI ablation in patients with typical AFl and no prior history of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included patients with typical AFl and no prior history of AF that were referred for CTI ablation. Patients were excluded when they had received repeat ablations or did not demonstrate a bidirectional block. In all patients, a post-ablation electrocardiogram (ECG) in sinus rhythm was evaluated for the presence of aIAB, defined as a P-wave duration ≥120 ms and biphasic morphology in the inferior leads. New-onset AF was identified from 12-lead ECGs, Holter monitoring, and device interrogations. The cohort comprised 187 patients (age 67 ± 10.7 years; ejection fraction 55.8 ± 11.2%). Advanced interatrial block was detected in 18.2% of patients, and left atrium was larger in patients with aIAB compared with those without aIAB (46.2 ± 5.9 vs. 43.1 ± 6.0 mm; P = 0.01). Over a median follow-up of 24.2 months, 67 patients (35.8%) developed new-onset AF. The incidence of new-onset AF was greater in patients with aIAB compared with those without aIAB (64.7 vs. 29.4%; P < 0.001). After a comprehensive multivariate analysis, aIAB emerged as the strongest predictor of new-onset AF [odds ratio (OR) 4.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9-9.3; P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Advanced interatrial block is a key predictor for high risk of new-onset AF after a successful CTI ablation in patients with typical AFl.

Left atrial volumes and associated stroke subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Cardio embolism and cerebrovascular atherosclerosis are two major mechanisms of stroke. Studies investigating associations between advanced echocardiographic parameters and stroke mechanisms are limited. METHODS: This study is a standardized review of 633 patients admitted to the stroke service of a tertiary care hospital following a standardized stroke investigation and management pathway. Stroke subtypes were characterized using the Causative Classification System, using the hospitals online radiologic archival system with CCS certified stroke investigators. Patients with two mechanisms were excluded. RESULTS: Patients with cardioembolic stroke had a higher proportion of atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001), acute myocardial infarction (p < 0.001) and ischemic heart disease (p < 0.001). On electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic Echo (TTE), patients with cardioembolic stroke had a greater atrial fibrillation (p < .00), left ventricular thrombus (p < .00), left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (p < .00) and global hypokinesia (p < .00) Patients with cardioembolic stroke had higher mean left atrial volume indices (LAVi) (p < 0.001), mean left ventricular mass indices (LVMi) (p < 0.05) and mean left atrial diameters (LAD) (p < 0.05). At LAVi of 29-33 ml/m2, the risk of atherothrombotic stroke increased. The risk of cardioembolic stroke increased with LAVi of 34 ml/m2 and above. CONCLUSION: Left atrial volume indices may be linked to specific stroke phenotype. At mild increases in left atrial dimensions, the risks of atherosclerotic stroke are high, and probably reflect hypertension as the unifying mechanism. Further increases in left atrial dimensions shifts the risk towards cardioembolic stroke.

Congenital absence of left circumflex artery with a dominant right coronary artery.

Case 1: a 40-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with progressively worsening post myocardial infarction angina. Cardiac catheterisation was performed, which showed total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and the left circumflex artery (LCX) was not visualised. The right coronary artery (RCA) was a large artery supplying the left ventricular inferior and posterolateral walls and filling the LAD artery in retrograde. The patient was referred for coronary artery bypass grafting. Peroperative findings confirmed the angiographic evidence of congenitally absent LCX artery.Case 2: a 39-year-old man with a family history of premature coronary artery disease underwent coronary angiography for the work-up of chest pain. A coronary angiogram showed normal LAD artery and absence of left circumflex system. The RCA was superdominant. An aortogram confirmed no anomalous origin and true absence of LCX artery.