ABSTRACT
Background and objectives Appendicitis is a frequent cause of abdominal pain. Because of the limited availability of imaging services in many medical centers and an urge to reduce the substantial number of unnecessary appendectomies, several clinical diagnostic tools have been constructed. A novel diagnostic tool, referred to as the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) score, has been created to assist in identifying acute appendicitis (AA) in Asian nations. The study aimed to assess the correlation between RIPASA scores and the severity of appendicitis as determined by pathological examination. Materials and methods The study was a prospective observational investigation undertaken in the Department of General Surgery at Muslim education society (MES) Medical College Perinthalmanna over 12 months. The study included all patients who had been diagnosed with AA and underwent appendectomy, provided they satisfied both the inclusion and exclusion criteria. An analysis was conducted on a convenience sample of 225 individuals using a prestructured proforma. The RIPASA scores were estimated before their surgery, taking into account their age, gender, symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory findings. These scores were subsequently contrasted with the histopathological results obtained after the appendectomy. The individuals were categorized into three groups according to their RIPASA scores. The lower-score category, scores between 4 and 7. The intermediate-score category consists of scores ranging from 7.5 to 11.5, while the higher-score category includes scores of 12 and above. These scores are correlated with the histopathology report (HPR) to determine the presence of appendicitis, perforated appendix, appendicular abscess, or the absence of pathology observed. Results The study population comprised of 137 (60.9%) males and 88 (39.1%) females. Among these, 177 individuals (78.7%) were younger than 40 years, while 48 individuals (21.3%) were older than 40 years. Out of 225 cases, 146 cases were AA (64.9%), 27 (12%) appendicular abscess cases, and 41 (18.2%) appendicular perforation cases. The normal appendix was noted in 11 out of 225 cases in the low-score group. The association between the histopathological report and RIPASA score was found to be statistically highly significant (p=0.000). In the low-score group, there were 14 cases of appendicitis (53.8%), one case of appendicular abscess (3.8%), a total of 11 cases without pathology observed (42.3%), and no reported instances of appendicular perforation. In the intermediate-score category, there were 121 cases of appendicitis (89.6%), 12 cases of appendicular abscess (8.9%), 2 cases of appendicular perforation (1.5%), and no reported cases in the non-pathology category. Among the high-score category, there were 11 cases of appendicitis (17.2%), 14 cases of appendicular abscess (21.9%), 39 cases of appendicular perforation (60.9%), and no reported instances of negative appendectomy. Conclusion The study has shown that the RIPASA scoring system had a high diagnostic efficacy in identifying AA. This scoring system is an effective, dependable, cost-effective, noninvasive, reproducible, and safe diagnostic technique that does not require additional expenses or concerns.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Thyroid cancer, though relatively uncommon among all cancer types, stands as the primary form of endocrine tumor. Over the last 20 years, there has been a significant uptick in its occurrence. Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), which is well-differentiated, emerges as the dominant subtype, in regions where iodine levels are deemed adequate. The study aimed to study the clinicopathological profile of patients diagnosed with thyroid malignancies at the Muslim Educational Society (MES) Medical College Perinthalmanna. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study undertaken at the MES Medical College by the Department of General Surgery and Endocrine Surgery. The study focuses on patients who have been diagnosed with thyroid cancer through a biopsy. Case sheets of all those patients diagnosed with thyroid malignancy were referred from the Medical Records Library to collect the relevant medical and sociodemographic data. This data was entered in the proforma, which was transferred to the Excel sheet and processed in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Released 2011; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). RESULTS: The study included predominantly middle-aged individuals (40-60 years), with 22 (55%) falling within this age range, followed by 14 (35%) aged between 20 and 40 years, and only four (10%) above 60 years. Female patients constituted 82.5% of the study group. Most cases presented with swelling lasting less than six months 23 (57.5%), while only four (10%) had swelling lasting more than five years. Compression symptoms were rare, with only three (7.5%) experiencing dysphagia or dyspnea. Pain was reported in two (5%) of the cases. Hypothyroidism, toxic manifestations, or hoarseness were observed in one (2.5%) of the patients. Regarding swelling characteristics, most were greater than 4 cm in size (29, 72%) and firm in consistency (25, 62.5%). Nodular surfaces were present in 19 (47.5%) of the cases, while 38 (95%) of the swellings were mobile. Palpable lymph nodes were noted in 13 (32.5%) of cases. Radiologically, hypoechoic lesions were observed in 26 (65%) of cases, with microcalcification in 29 (72.5%) and peripheral vascularity in 31 (77.5%). Papillary carcinoma was the most common histological type (34, 85%), with medullary and follicular carcinomas accounting for five (12.5%) and one (2.5%), respectively. An association was found between the duration of swelling and histological type (p = 0.05) and between the mobility of swelling and histological type (p < 0.05). However, no significant associations were observed between imaging findings and histological type (p > 0.05). The gender distribution did not show a statistically significant association with histological type. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study revealed a statistically insignificant association between age, gender, clinical features, and the histological type of thyroid malignancy. Additionally, there was no statistically significant association between the histological type of thyroid malignancy and the size or type of surface or consistency of thyroid swelling or ultrasonographic findings of the swelling like echogenicity, microcalcification, increased peripheral vascularity, or loss of peripheral halo.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is a common surgical problem around the world. The two types of groin hernias are femoral hernias and direct and indirect inguinal hernias. The incidence rate is higher among males. This investigation intends to differentiate between open and laparoscopic methods of inguinal hernia surgery with respect to operative time, seroma formation, duration of hospitalization, and return to normal activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study included 84 patients with unilateral, bilateral, direct, and indirect inguinal hernias, but excluded those who were unwilling to have surgery, were under 12, had comorbidities, or had complete and recurrent hernias. In the end, 42 underwent open, and 42 underwent laparoscopic repair. Visual analog scales were used for pain assessments. Chi-square and unpaired student T-tests were employed (p<0.05). RESULTS: Among the 84 individuals analyzed, 79 (94.04%) were male patients, with the majority of them falling between the ages of 41 and 55. In contrast to the open group of patients, the laparoscopic group experienced a significant increase in operative time with a highly significant statistical difference (p<0.0001), and the laparoscopic group experienced a significant decrease in post-operative pain score with an insignificant p-value. A significant statistical difference (p<0.005) was estimated among the laparoscopic and open groups of patients in terms of post-operative hospitalization. Returning to normal activities was significantly different for laparoscopic patients relative to the open group (p-value<0.001). With a high level of significance of p<0.001, laparoscopic hernia repair required less time to recover before returning to normal activities than open hernia repair (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: In terms of decreased post-operative discomfort, shorter hospitalization, and an earlier return to activities, laparoscopic hernia repair has been found to be superior to open hernia repair, which is also known as Lichtenstein surgery. However, there was no discernible difference among the two groups with regard to post-operative problems, including seroma development and wound infections. To assess chronic discomfort and recurrence rates after laparoscopic hernia surgery, additional studies and extended follow-up are required.
