Does KONO-S anastomosis reduce recurrence in Crohn's disease compared to conventional ileocolonic anastomosis? A nationwide propensity score-matched study from GETAID Chirurgie Group (KoCoRICCO study).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postoperative recurrence is a major concern in Crohn's disease. The Kono-S anastomosis has been described to reduce the rate of recurrence. However, the level of evidence for its effectiveness remains low. The KoCoRICCO study aimed to compare outcomes between Kono-S anastomosis and conventional anastomosis in two nationwide prospective cohorts. METHODS: Adult patients with Crohn's disease who underwent ileocolonic resection with Kono-S anastomosis were prospectively included in seven referral centers between 2020 and 2022. Patients with conventional side-to-side anastomosis were enrolled from a previously published cohort. A propensity score analysis was performed to compare recurrence at first endoscopy in a matched 1:2 ratio population. RESULTS: A total of 433 patients with ileocolonic anastomosis were enrolled, of whom 155 had a Kono-S anastomosis. Before matching, both groups were unbalanced for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics. After matching patients with available endoscopic follow-up, endoscopic recurrence ≥i2 was found in 47.5% of the Kono-S group and 44.3% of the conventional side-to-side group (p=0.6745). CONCLUSIONS: The KoCoRICCO study suggests that Kono-S anastomosis does not reduce the risk of endoscopic recurrence in Crohn's disease compared to conventional side-to-side anastomosis. Further research with a longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether there is a potential benefit on surgical recurrence.

KONO-S Anastomosis Is Not Superior to Conventional Anastomosis for the Reduction of Postoperative Endoscopic Recurrence in Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection rates remain high in Crohn's disease (CD). Reducing postoperative recurrence (POR) is challenging. Besides drug therapy, the surgical anastomosis technique may reduce POR. We aimed to compare the endoscopic POR rate after Kono-S vs standard ileocolic anastomosis. METHODS: The study included all consecutive CD patients operated on for ileocolic resection with a Kono-S anastomosis between February 2020 and March 2022. These patients were prospectively followed, and colonoscopy was performed 6 to 12 months after surgery. Patients were compared with a historical cohort of patients operated on with a conventional anastomosis in the same center. The primary end point was endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts score ≥i2). Factors associated with POR were assessed by univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were included, 30 in the Kono-S group and 55 in the control group. At baseline, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding CD characteristics or known POR risk factors, including previous exposure to biologics. At 6 to 12 months, endoscopic POR rate did not differ significantly between groups (56.7% in the Kono-S group vs 49.1% in the control group; P = .50), nor did endoscopic POR according to the modified Rutgeerts score ≥i2b (46.7% in the Kono-S group vs 40% in the control group; P = .55). Severe endoscopic POR rates were 23.3% and 18.2% in each group, respectively. Clinical recurrence rate was similar in both groups, and no recurrent surgery occurred. By multivariable analysis, the type of anastomosis was not associated with endoscopic POR (OR, 1.229; 95% CI, 0.461-3.274, P = .68); however, postoperative treatment with anti-TNF was (OR, 0.337; 95% CI, 0.131-0.865 P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Kono-S anastomosis was not associated with a reduced rate of endoscopic POR. These results warrant confirmation in prospective, randomized, multicenter studies.

This study aimed to evaluate the role of Kono-S anastomosis in postoperative recurrence (POR), in a prospective cohort of Crohn's disease patients undergoing ileocolic resection with this anastomosis. Results were compared with a historical cohort of patients who were operated on with conventional anastomosis. Endoscopic POR rate did not differ significantly between groups, and the type of anastomosis was not associated with endoscopic POR by multivariable analysis.

Wound Healing versus Metastasis: Role of Oxidative Stress.

Many signaling pathways, molecular and cellular actors which are critical for wound healing have been implicated in cancer metastasis. These two conditions are a complex succession of cellular biological events and accurate regulation of these events is essential. Apart from inflammation, macrophages-released ROS arise as major regulators of these processes. But, whatever the pathology concerned, oxidative stress is a complicated phenomenon to control and requires a finely tuned balance over the different stages and responding cells. This review provides an overview of the pivotal role of oxidative stress in both wound healing and metastasis, encompassing the contribution of macrophages. Indeed, macrophages are major ROS producers but also appear as their targets since ROS interfere with their differentiation and function. Elucidating ROS functions in wound healing and metastatic spread may allow the development of innovative therapeutic strategies involving redox modulators.