Factores de riesgo de infección de fracturas de meseta tibial / Risk factors for infection of tibial plateau fractures

Introducción: Las fracturas de meseta tibial (FMT) son lesiones propensas a infecciones postoperatorias, siendo la incidencia descrita superior a la del resto de fracturas, entre un 5 y un 12%. Los objetivos primarios de este estudio fueron cuantificar la tasa de infección postoperatoria de osteosíntesis de FMT e identificar los factores de riesgo de esta. Material y métodos: Estudio de cohorte retrospectiva incluyendo a pacientes intervenidos de osteosíntesis de FMT entre 2015 y 2020, en un mismo centro. La población del estudio se dividió en 2 grupos, según la presencia o no de infección postoperatoria. Se recogieron variables demográficas relacionadas con la fractura, parámetros quirúrgicos, así como necesidad de reintervención. Finalmente, en caso de desbridamiento, se recogieron número de cultivos positivos y patógeno responsable de infección, así como el tratamiento aplicado. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 124 pacientes, con un total de 14 infecciones (tasa global de infección de 11,3%). Se identificaron como factores de riesgo para desarrollar infección el hecho de tratarse de fracturas abiertas (p=0,002), fracturas tipo Schatzker V y VI (p=0,002) y el uso de fijador externo (p<0,001). En lo que respecta a las variables quirúrgicas solo se identificó el mayor tiempo de isquemia (p=0,032) como factor de riesgo. S. aureus fue el microorganismo más frecuentemente identificado (43%), seguido de E. cloacae (35,7%). Conclusión: La tasa global de infección tras osteosíntesis de fractura de meseta tibial fue del 11,3%. Diferentes factores se asocian a más riesgo de infección, entre ellos la diabetes mellitus, las fracturas abiertas, el uso de fijador externo, un mayor grado en la clasificación de Schatzker o un mayor tiempo de isquemia intraoperatoria.(AU)

Introduction: Tibial plateau fractures are injuries prone to postoperative infection, with its reported incidence being higher than that of other fractures, between 5% and 12%. The primary objectives of this study were to quantify the postoperative infection rate of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures (TPF) and to identify the risk factors for this. Material and methods: Retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent TPF osteosynthesis between 2015 and 2020, in the same center. The study population was divided into two groups, according to the presence or absence of postoperative infection. Demographic variables related to the fracture, surgical parameters, as well as the need for reoperation were collected. Finally, in the case of debridement, the number of positive cultures and the pathogen responsible for the infection were collected, as well as the treatment applied. Results: One hundred and twenty-four patients were included, with a total of 14 infections (global infection rate of 11.3%). Risk factors for developing infection were open fractures (P=.002), Schatzker V and VI type fractures (P=.002) and the use of external fixation (P<.001). Regarding the surgical variables, only the longest ischemia time (P=.032) was identified as a risk factor. S. aureus was the most frequently identified microorganism (43%), followed by E. cloacae (35.7%). Conclusion: The overall infection rate after osteosynthesis of tibial plateau fractures was 11.3%. Different factors are associated with a higher risk of infection, including diabetes mellitus, open fractures, the use of external fixation, a higher grade in the Schatzker classification or a longer intraoperative ischemia time.(AU)

[Translated article] Risk factors for infection of tibial plateau fractures / Factores de riesgo de infección de fracturas de meseta tibial

Introducción: Las fracturas de meseta tibial (FMT) son lesiones propensas a infecciones postoperatorias, siendo la incidencia descrita superior a la del resto de fracturas, entre un 5 y un 12%. Los objetivos primarios de este estudio fueron cuantificar la tasa de infección postoperatoria de osteosíntesis de FMT e identificar los factores de riesgo de esta. Material y métodos: Estudio de cohorte retrospectiva incluyendo a pacientes intervenidos de osteosíntesis de FMT entre 2015 y 2020, en un mismo centro. La población del estudio se dividió en 2 grupos, según la presencia o no de infección postoperatoria. Se recogieron variables demográficas relacionadas con la fractura, parámetros quirúrgicos, así como necesidad de reintervención. Finalmente, en caso de desbridamiento, se recogieron número de cultivos positivos y patógeno responsable de infección, así como el tratamiento aplicado. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 124 pacientes, con un total de 14 infecciones (tasa global de infección de 11,3%). Se identificaron como factores de riesgo para desarrollar infección el hecho de tratarse de fracturas abiertas (p=0,002), fracturas tipo Schatzker V y VI (p=0,002) y el uso de fijador externo (p<0,001). En lo que respecta a las variables quirúrgicas solo se identificó el mayor tiempo de isquemia (p=0,032) como factor de riesgo. S. aureus fue el microorganismo más frecuentemente identificado (43%), seguido de E. cloacae (35,7%). Conclusión: La tasa global de infección tras osteosíntesis de fractura de meseta tibial fue del 11,3%. Diferentes factores se asocian a más riesgo de infección, entre ellos la diabetes mellitus, las fracturas abiertas, el uso de fijador externo, un mayor grado en la clasificación de Schatzker o un mayor tiempo de isquemia intraoperatoria.(AU)

Introduction: Tibial plateau fractures are injuries prone to postoperative infection, with its reported incidence being higher than that of other fractures, between 5% and 12%. The primary objectives of this study were to quantify the postoperative infection rate of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures (TPF) and to identify the risk factors for this. Material and methods: Retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent TPF osteosynthesis between 2015 and 2020, in the same center. The study population was divided into two groups, according to the presence or absence of postoperative infection. Demographic variables related to the fracture, surgical parameters, as well as the need for reoperation were collected. Finally, in the case of debridement, the number of positive cultures and the pathogen responsible for the infection were collected, as well as the treatment applied. Results: One hundred and twenty-four patients were included, with a total of 14 infections (global infection rate of 11.3%). Risk factors for developing infection were open fractures (P=.002), Schatzker V and VI type fractures (P=.002) and the use of external fixation (P<.001). Regarding the surgical variables, only the longest ischemia time (P=.032) was identified as a risk factor. S. aureus was the most frequently identified microorganism (43%), followed by E. cloacae (35.7%). Conclusion: The overall infection rate after osteosynthesis of tibial plateau fractures was 11.3%. Different factors are associated with a higher risk of infection, including diabetes mellitus, open fractures, the use of external fixation, a higher grade in the Schatzker classification or a longer intraoperative ischemia time.(AU)

Risk factors for infection of tibial plateau fractures. / Factores de riesgo de infección de fracturas de meseta tibial.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial plateau fractures are injuries prone to postoperative infection, with its reported incidence being higher than that of other fractures, between 5% and 12%. The primary objectives of this study were to quantify the postoperative infection rate of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures (TPF) and to identify the risk factors for this. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent TPF osteosynthesis between 2015 and 2020, in the same center. The study population was divided into two groups, according to the presence or absence of postoperative infection. Demographic variables related to the fracture, surgical parameters, as well as the need for reoperation were collected. Finally, in the case of debridement, the number of positive cultures and the pathogen responsible for the infection were collected, as well as the treatment applied. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four patients were included, with a total of 14 infections (global infection rate of 11.3%). Risk factors for developing infection were open fractures (P=.002), Schatzker V and VI type fractures (P=.002) and the use of external fixation (P<.001). Regarding the surgical variables, only the longest ischemia time (P=.032) was identified as a risk factor. S. aureus was the most frequently identified microorganism (43%), followed by E. cloacae (35.7%). CONCLUSION: The overall infection rate after osteosynthesis of tibial plateau fractures was 11.3%. Different factors are associated with a higher risk of infection, including diabetes mellitus, open fractures, the use of external fixation, a higher grade in the Schatzker classification or a longer intraoperative ischemia time.

[Translated article] Risk factors for infection of tibial plateau fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial plateau fractures are injuries prone to postoperative infection, with its reported incidence being higher than that of other fractures, between 5% and 12%. The primary objectives of this study were to quantify the postoperative infection rate of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) and to identify the risk factors for this. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent TPF osteosynthesis between 2015 and 2020, in the same center. The study population was divided into two groups, according to the presence or absence of postoperative infection. Demographic variables related to the fracture, surgical parameters, as well as the need for reoperation were collected. Finally, in the case of debridement, the number of positive cultures and the pathogen responsible for the infection were collected, as well as the treatment applied. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four patients were included, with a total of 14 infections (global infection rate of 11.3%). Risk factors for developing infection were open fractures (p=.002), Schatzker V and VI type fractures (p=.002) and the use of external fixation (p<.001). Regarding the surgical variables, only the longest ischemia time (p=.032) was identified as a risk factor. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently identified microorganism (43%), followed by Enterobacter cloacae (35.7%). CONCLUSION: The overall infection rate after osteosynthesis of tibial plateau fractures was 11.3%. Different factors are associated with a higher risk of infection, including diabetes mellitus, open fractures, the use of external fixation, a higher grade in the Schatzker classification or a longer intraoperative ischemia time.

Implant sonication increases the diagnostic accuracy of infection in patients with delayed, but not early, orthopaedic implant failure.

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of infection between the culture of fluid obtained by sonication (SFC) and the culture of peri-implant tissues (PITC) in patients with early and delayed implant failure, and those with unsuspected and suspected septic failure. It was hypothesised that SFC increases the diagnostic accuracy for infection in delayed, but not early, implant failure, and in unsuspected septic failure. The diagnostic accuracy for infection of all consecutive implants (hardware or prostheses) that were removed for failure was compared between SFC and PITC. This prospective study included 317 patients with a mean age of 62.7 years (9 to 97). The sensitivity for detection of infection using SFC was higher than using PITC in an overall comparison (89.9% versus 67%, respectively; p < 0.001), in unsuspected septic failure (100% versus 48.5%, respectively; p < 0.001), and in delayed implant failure (88% versus 58%, respectively; p < 0.001). PITC sensitivity dropped significantly in unsuspected compared with suspected septic failure (p = 0.007), and in delayed compared with early failure (p = 0.013). There were no differences in specificity. Sonication is mainly recommended when there is implant failure with no clear signs of infection and in patients with delayed implant failure. In early failure, SFC is not superior to PITC for the diagnosis of infection and, therefore, is not recommended as a routine diagnostic test in these patients.

The relationship between microbiology results in the second of a two-stage exchange procedure using cement spacers and the outcome after revision total joint replacement for infection: the use of sonication to aid bacteriological analysis.

Patients with infected arthroplasties are normally treated with a two-stage exchange procedure using polymethylmethacrylate bone cement spacers impregnated with antibiotics. However, spacers may act as a foreign body to which micro-organisms may adhere and grow. In this study it was hypothesised that subclinical infection may be diagnosed with sonication of the surface biofilm of the spacer. The aims were to assess the presence of subclinical infection through sonication of the spacer at the time of a second-stage procedure, and to determine the relationship between subclinical infection and the clinical outcome. Of 55 patients studied, 11 (20%) were diagnosed with subclinical infection. At a mean follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range 6 to 18), clinical failure was found in 18 (32.7%) patients. Of the patients previously diagnosed with subclinical infection, 63% (7 of 11) had failed compared with 25% (11 of 44) of those without subclinical infection (odds ratio 5.25, 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 21.4, p = 0.021). Sonication of the biofilm of the surface of the spacer is useful in order to exclude subclinical infection and therefore contributes to improving the outcome after two-stage procedures.

[The sequelae of osteoporotic femoral fracture in Barcelona]. / Secuelas de la fractura osteoporótica de fémur en Barcelona.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present was to study the long term sequelae of osteoporotic fracture of the femur in a general hospital of 300 beds in Barcelona, analyzing 1) mortality; 2) degree of functional capacity; 3) care requirements; 4) familial repercussion, and 5) psychic repercussion. METHODS: Structured telephone interviews were carried out between 1990-1991 with the patients attended for osteoporotic fracture of the femur in our center from 1988-1989. Of a total of 145 patients, 12 died within 1 month. Among the remaining patients the interview was performed with 100 patients--25 of whom were males of 78 +/- 8 years of age and 75 females of 82 +/- 10 years of age. The degree of functional capacity was evaluated by the index of independence in daily activities (DA). RESULTS: Mortality within one month was 8.3%; at one year 30% and at 2 years 38%. Factors associated with the highest mortality were: age of over 80 years (p less than 0.004), deterioration of post fracture functional capacity (p less than 0.0004) and pre-fracture dementia (p less than 0.01). Important deterioration in post fracture functional capacity was seen in 45% of the cases. Seventeen percent of the patients required transfer to a center for chronic care and 34% resided in a center for chronic care prior to the fracture. Familial repercussion was observed in 43% of the cases and post fracture psychologic repercussion was seen in 28%. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporotic fracture of the femur presents the following sequelae: mortality, intense deterioration of functional capacity and important health care requirements in addition to considerable familial and psychological repercussion.