ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold. First, to compare the contrast between spinal multiple myeloma (MM) focal lesions and surrounding bone marrow obtained on T2-weighted Dixon fat-only MR images to that obtained on T1-weighted spin-echo images. Second, to search for correlation between bone marrow fat fraction assessed by T2-weighted Dixon sequence and International Myeloma Working Group myeloma defining events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 39 patients with 112 focal MM lesions were included. There were 25 men and 14 women with a mean age of 68.8±9.8 [SD] years (range: 49-88 years). Contrast between focal MM lesions and surrounding bone marrow was calculated on T1-weighted spin-echo and T2-weighted Dixon (including water-only and fat-only) images. Contrast between focal MM lesions and bone marrow was compared using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests. Correlation between bone marrow fat fraction and myeloma defining events was assessed using Spearman's correlation test. RESULTS: MM lesion contrast was greater on T2-weighted Dixon (F (2;93)=35.10) than on T1-weighted images (P<0.0001). Greatest MM lesion contrast was achieved with T2-weighted Dixon fat-only (0.63±0.21 [SD]; range: 0.06-0.91) compared to T2-weighted Dixon water-only (0.45±0.20 [SD]; range: 0.07-0.8) (P=0.0003) and T1-weighted (0.23±0.19 [SD]; range: 0.04-0.87) (P<0.0001) images. There were no significant correlations between myeloma defining events and fat fraction. CONCLUSION: T2-weighted Dixon fat-only images provide greater contrast between MM lesions and adjacent bone marrow than T1-weighted images. The usefulness of a T1-weighted sequence associated to a T2-weighted Dixon sequence has to be determined.
Subject(s)
Image Enhancement/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Multiple Myeloma/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Marrow/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Signal-To-Noise RatioABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the normal values of the antero-posterior (AP) diameter of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) of the elbow as it passes beneath the arcade of Frohse and to search for PIN-diameter differences between the upstream, entry point and downstream of the arcade. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty asymptomatic patients prospectively underwent bilateral B-mode ultrasound of the PIN of the elbow. There were 15 men and 15 women with a mean age of 30.2±5.31 (SD) years (range: 26-43 years). Of these, 23 patients were right-handers (23/30; 77%) and 7 were left handers (7/30; 23%). AP diameter of the PIN was measured in long axis at three different locations including the entry point of the arcade, 5-mm upstream and 5-mm downstream the arcade. A comparison between the three measurements was performed using paired t-test. RESULTS: The mean AP diameters of the PIN were 0.83±0.21 (SD) mm (range: 0.43-1.31mm), 0.6±0.17 (SD) mm (range: 0.29-1.16mm) and 0.49±0.13 (SD) mm (range: 0.26-0.86mm) at 5-mm upstream, entry point of the arcade and 5-mm downstream the arcade of Frohse, respectively. Significant drops in PIN diameter were found between upstream and the arcade (-0.23mm; 27%; P<0.001), between the arcade and downstream (-0.11mm; 17%; P<0.001), and between upstream and downstream the arcade (-0.34mm; 40%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Disparity in AP diameter of the PIN of the elbow in the arcade of Frohse is a normal finding and should not be erroneously interpreted as entrapment when present alone.
