Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Hip Fractures are Commonly Classified as Having Osteoporosis Based on DXA Measurements.

Periprosthetic femoral hip fractures are subject to an increasing incidence and are often considered to be related to osteoporosis. However, there are no available studies that have determined the frequency of osteoporosis in affected patients using gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this retrospective comparative study, we analyzed the DXA results of 40 patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures who were treated surgically in our department. DXA measurements were performed at the total hip and the lumbar spine to determine bone mineral density T-scores. Data were compared to two age-, sex-, and BMI-matched control groups in which patients underwent DXA prior to aseptic revision surgery for other causes or primary THA (consisting of 40 patients each). The mean T-score in the periprosthetic fracture cohort was significantly lower (- 1.78 ± 1.78) than that of the aseptic revision (- 0.65 ± 1.58, mean difference - 1.13 [95% CI - 1.88 to - 0.37]; p = 0.001) and the primary THA cohort (- 0.77 ± 1.34, mean difference - 1.01 [95% CI - 1.77 to - 0.26]; p = 0.005). Accordingly, osteoporosis was detected more frequently (45%) in the fracture cohort compared to patients undergoing aseptic revision (12.5%) and primary THA (10%). In conclusion, almost half of the patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures have osteoporosis according to DXA measurements. A regular assessment of bone health in THA enables identification of patients with osteoporosis who likely benefit from initiation of osteoporosis medication and cemented stem fixation.

Alterations in compositional and cellular properties of the subchondral bone are linked to cartilage degeneration in hip osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The subchondral bone is an emerging regulator of osteoarthritis (OA). However, knowledge of how specific subchondral alterations relate to cartilage degeneration remains incomplete. METHOD: Femoral heads were obtained from 44 patients with primary OA during total hip arthroplasty and from 30 non-OA controls during autopsy. A multiscale assessment of the central subchondral bone region comprising histomorphometry, quantitative backscattered electron imaging, nanoindentation, and osteocyte lacunocanalicular network characterization was employed. RESULTS: In hip OA, thickening of the subchondral bone coincided with a higher number of osteoblasts (controls: 3.7 ± 4.5 mm-1, OA: 16.4 ± 10.2 mm-1, age-adjusted mean difference 10.5 mm-1 [95% CI 4.7 to 16.4], p < 0.001) but a similar number of osteoclasts compared to controls (p = 0.150). Furthermore, higher matrix mineralization heterogeneity (CaWidth, controls: 2.8 ± 0.2 wt%, OA: 3.1 ± 0.3 wt%, age-adjusted mean difference 0.2 wt% [95% CI 0.1 to 0.4], p = 0.011) and lower tissue hardness (controls: 0.69 ± 0.06 GPa, OA: 0.67 ± 0.06 GPa, age-adjusted mean difference -0.05 GPa [95% CI -0.09 to -0.01], p = 0.032) were detected. While no evidence of altered osteocytic perilacunar/canalicular remodeling in terms of fewer osteocyte canaliculi was found in OA, specimens with advanced cartilage degeneration showed a higher number of osteocyte canaliculi and larger lacunocanalicular network area compared to those with low-grade cartilage degeneration. Multiple linear regression models indicated that several subchondral bone properties, especially osteoblast and osteocyte parameters, were closely related to cartilage degeneration (R2 adjusted = 0.561, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Subchondral bone properties in OA are affected at the compositional, mechanical, and cellular levels. Based on their strong interaction with cartilage degeneration, targeting osteoblasts/osteocytes may be a promising therapeutic OA approach. DATA AND MATERIALS AVAILABILITY: All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.

Piezo1 expression in chondrocytes controls endochondral ossification and osteoarthritis development.

Piezo proteins are mechanically activated ion channels, which are required for mechanosensing functions in a variety of cell types. While we and others have previously demonstrated that the expression of Piezo1 in osteoblast lineage cells is essential for bone-anabolic processes, there was only suggestive evidence indicating a role of Piezo1 and/or Piezo2 in cartilage. Here we addressed the question if and how chondrocyte expression of the mechanosensitive proteins Piezo1 or Piezo2 controls physiological endochondral ossification and pathological osteoarthritis (OA) development. Mice with chondrocyte-specific inactivation of Piezo1 (Piezo1Col2a1Cre), but not of Piezo2, developed a near absence of trabecular bone below the chondrogenic growth plate postnatally. Moreover, all Piezo1Col2a1Cre animals displayed multiple fractures of rib bones at 7 days of age, which were located close to the growth plates. While skeletal growth was only mildly affected in these mice, OA pathologies were markedly less pronounced compared to littermate controls at 60 weeks of age. Likewise, when OA was induced by anterior cruciate ligament transection, only the chondrocyte inactivation of Piezo1, not of Piezo2, resulted in attenuated articular cartilage degeneration. Importantly, osteophyte formation and maturation were also reduced in Piezo1Col2a1Cre mice. We further observed increased Piezo1 protein abundance in cartilaginous zones of human osteophytes. Finally, we identified Ptgs2 and Ccn2 as potentially relevant Piezo1 downstream genes in chondrocytes. Collectively, our data do not only demonstrate that Piezo1 is a critical regulator of physiological and pathological endochondral ossification processes, but also suggest that Piezo1 antagonists may be established as a novel approach to limit osteophyte formation in OA.

Mice heterozygous for an osteogenesis imperfecta-linked MBTPS2 variant display a compromised subchondral osteocyte lacunocanalicular network associated with abnormal articular cartilage.

Missense variants in the MBTPS2 gene, located on the X chromosome, have been associated with an X-linked recessive form of osteogenesis imperfecta (X-OI), an inherited bone dysplasia characterized by multiple and recurrent bone fractures, short stature, and various skeletal deformities in affected individuals. The role of site-2 protease, encoded by MBTPS2, and the molecular pathomechanism underlying the disease are to date elusive. This study is the first to report on the generation of two Mbtps2 mouse models, a knock-in mouse carrying one of the disease-causative MBTPS2 variants (N455S) and a Mbtps2 knock-out (ko) mouse. Because both loss-of-function variants lead to embryonic lethality in hemizygous male mutant mice, we performed a comprehensive skeletal analysis of heterozygous Mbtps2+/N455S and Mbtps2+/ko female mice. Both models displayed osteochondral abnormalities such as thinned subchondral bone, altered subchondral osteocyte interconnectivity as well as thickened articular cartilage with chondrocyte clustering, altogether resembling an early osteoarthritis (OA) phenotype. However, distant from the joints, no alterations in the bone mass and turnover could be detected in either of the mutant mice. Based on our findings we conclude that MBTPS2 haploinsufficiency results in early OA-like alterations in the articular cartilage and underlying subchondral bone, which likely precede the development of typical OI phenotype in bone. Our study provides first evidence for a potential role of site-2 protease for maintaining homeostasis of both bone and cartilage.

Do Clinical Parameters Reflect Local Bone Metabolism in Heterotopic Ossification After Septic or Aseptic THA?

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after THA. Although current research primarily focuses on treatment and prevention, little is known about the local bone metabolism of HO and clinical contributing factors. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We aimed to assess bone remodeling processes in HO using histomorphometry, focusing on the effects of inflammation and prior NSAID treatment. Specifically, we asked: (1) Are HO specimens taken from patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) more likely to exhibit active bone modeling and remodeling than specimens taken at the time of revision from patients without infection? (2) Do clinical or inflammatory serum and synovial parameters reflect the microstructure of and remodeling in both HO entities? (3) Is NSAID treatment before revision surgery associated with altered local bone mineralization or remodeling properties? METHODS: Between June 2021 and May 2022, we screened 395 patients undergoing revision THA at two tertiary centers in Germany. Of those, we considered all patients with radiographic HO as potentially eligible. Based on that, 21% (83 of 395) were eligible; a further 43 were excluded because of an inability to remove the implant intraoperatively (16 patients), insufficient material (11), comorbidities with a major effect on bone metabolism (10), or bone-specific drugs (six), leaving 10% (40) for analysis in this retrospective, comparative study. HO specimens were collected during aseptic (25 patients: 18 male, seven female, mean age 70 ± 11 years, mean BMI 29 ± 4 kg/m 2 ) and septic (15 patients: 11 male, four female, mean age 69 ± 9 years, mean BMI 32 ± 9 kg/m 2 ) revision THA at a mean of 6 ± 7 years after primary implantation and a mean age of 70 ± 9 years at revision. Septic origin (PJI) was diagnosed based on the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria, through a preoperative assessment of serum and synovial parameters. To specify the local bone microstructure, ossification, and cellular bone turnover, we analyzed HO specimens using micro-CT and histomorphometry on undecalcified sections. Data were compared with those of controls, taken from femoral neck trabecular bone (10 patients: five female, five male, mean age 75 ± 6 years, mean BMI 28 ± 4 kg/m 2 ) and osteophytes (10 patients: five female, five male, mean age 70 ± 10 years, mean BMI 29 ± 7 kg/m 2 ). The time between primary implantation and revision (time in situ), HO severity based on the Brooker classification, and serum and synovial markers were correlated with HO microstructure and parameters of cellular bone turnover. In a subgroup of specimens of patients with NSAID treatment before revision, osteoid and bone turnover indices were evaluated and compared a matched cohort of specimens from patients without prior NSAID treatment. RESULTS: Patients with aseptic and septic HO presented with a higher bone volume (BV/TV; aseptic: 0.41 ± 0.15, mean difference 0.20 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.32]; septic: 0.43 ± 0.15, mean difference 0.22 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.36]; femoral neck: 0.21 ± 0.04; both p < 0.001), lower bone mineral density (aseptic: 809 ± 66 mg HA/cm 3 , mean difference -91 mg HA/cm 3 [95% CI -144 to -38]; septic: 789 ± 44 mg HA/cm 3 , mean difference -111 mg HA/cm 3 [95% CI -169 to -53]; femoral neck: 899 ± 20 mg HA/cm 3 ; both p < 0.001), and ongoing bone modeling with endochondral ossification and a higher proportion of woven, immature bone (aseptic: 25% ± 17%, mean difference 25% [95% CI 9% to 41%]; septic: 37% ± 23%, mean difference 36% [95% CI 19% to 54%]; femoral neck: 0.4% ± 0.5%; both p < 0.001) compared with femoral neck specimens. Moreover, bone surfaces were characterized by increased osteoblast and osteoclast indices in both aseptic and septic HO, although a higher density of osteocytes was detected exclusively in septic HO (aseptic: 158 ± 56 1/mm 2 versus septic: 272 ± 48 1/mm 2 , mean difference 114 1/mm 2 [95% CI 65 to 162]; p < 0.001). Compared with osteophytes, microstructure and turnover indices were largely similar in HO. The Brooker class was not associated with any local bone metabolism parameters. The time in situ was negatively associated with bone turnover in aseptic HO specimens (osteoblast surface per bone surface: r = -0.46; p = 0.01; osteoclast surface per bone surface: r = -0.56; p = 0.003). Serum or synovial inflammatory markers were not correlated with local bone turnover in septic HO. Specimens of patients with NSAID treatment before revision surgery had a higher osteoid thickness (10.1 ± 2.1 µm versus 5.5 ± 2.6 µm, mean difference -4.7 µm [95% CI -7.4 to -2.0]; p = 0.001), but there was no difference in other osteoid, structural, or cellular parameters. CONCLUSION: Aseptic and septic HO share phenotypic characteristics in terms of the sustained increase in bone metabolism, although differences in osteocyte and adipocyte numbers suggest distinct homeostatic mechanisms. These results suggest persistent bone modeling or remodeling, with osteoblast and osteoclast indices showing a moderate decline with the time in situ in aseptic HO. Future studies should use longitudinal study designs to correlate our findings with clinical outcomes (such as HO growth or recurrence). In addition, the molecular mechanisms of bone cell involvement during HO formation and growth should be further investigated, which may allow specific therapeutic and preventive interventions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, our study is the first to systematically investigate histomorphometric bone metabolism parameters in patients with HO after THA, providing a clinical reference for evaluating modeling and remodeling activity. Routine clinical, serum, and synovial markers are not useful for inferring local bone metabolism.

Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hallux valgus is the most common foot deformity and affects 23% to 35% of the general population. More than 150 different techniques have been described for surgical correction. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the use of minimally invasive surgery to correct hallux valgus deformities. A variety of studies have been published with differing outcomes regarding minimally invasive surgery. However, most studies lack sufficient power and are small, making it difficult to draw adequate conclusions. A meta-analysis can therefore be helpful to evaluate and compare minimally invasive and open surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled studies to answer the following question: Compared with open surgery, does minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus result in (1) improved American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores and VAS scores for pain, (2) improved radiologic outcomes, (3) fewer complications, or (4) a shorter duration of surgery? METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. A search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases on May 3, 2022. Studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled or prospective controlled studies that compared minimally invasive surgery and open surgery to treat patients with hallux valgus. We defined minimally invasive surgery as surgery performed through the smallest incision required to perform the procedure accurately, with an incision length of approximately 2 cm at maximum. Open surgery, on the other hand, involves a larger incision and direct visualization of deeper structures. Seven studies (395 feet), consisting of six randomized controlled studies and one prospective comparative study, were included in the qualitative and quantitative data synthesis. There were no differences between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups regarding age, gender, or severity of hallux valgus deformity. Each included study was assessed for the risk of bias using the second version of the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials or by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for comparative studies. Most of the included studies had intermediate quality regarding the risk of bias. We excluded one study from our analysis because of its high risk of bias to avoid serious distortions in the meta-analysis. We performed a sensitivity analysis to confirm that our meta-analysis was robust by including only studies with a low risk of bias. The analyzed endpoints included the AOFAS score (range 0 to 100), where higher scores represent less pain and better function; the minimum clinically important difference on this scale was 29 points. In addition, the VAS score was analyzed, which is based on a pain rating scale (range 0 to 10), with higher scores representing greater pain. Radiologic outcomes included the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, and distal metatarsal articular angle. Complications were qualitatively assessed and evaluated for differences. A random-effects model was used if substantial heterogeneity (I 2 > 50%) was found; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. RESULTS: We found no clinically important difference between minimally invasive and open surgery in terms of the AOFAS score (88 ± 7 versus 85 ± 8, respectively; mean difference 4 points [95% CI 1 to 6]; p < 0.01). There were no differences between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups in terms of VAS scores (0 ± 0 versus 0 ± 1, respectively; standardized mean difference 0 points [95% CI -1 to 0]; p = 0.08). There were no differences between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups in terms of the hallux valgus angle (12° ± 4° versus 12° ± 4°; mean difference 0 points [95% CI -2 to 2]; p = 0.76). Radiographic measurements of the intermetatarsal angle did not differ between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups (7° ± 2° versus 7° ± 2°; mean difference 0 points [95% CI -1 to 1]; p = 0.69). In addition, there were no differences between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups in terms of the distal metatarsal articular angle (7° ± 4° versus 8° ± 4°; mean difference -1 point [95% CI -4 to 2]; p = 0.28). The qualitative analysis revealed no difference in the frequency or severity of complications between the minimally invasive and the open surgery groups. The minimally invasive and open surgery groups did not differ in terms of the duration of surgery (28 ± 8 minutes versus 40 ± 10 minutes; mean difference -12 minutes [95% CI -25 to 1]; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found that hallux valgus treated with minimally invasive surgery did not result in improved clinical or radiologic outcomes compared with open surgery. Methodologic shortcomings of the source studies in this meta-analysis likely inflated the apparent benefits of minimally invasive surgery, such that in reality it may be inferior to the traditional approach. Given the associated learning curves-during which patients may be harmed by surgeons who are gaining familiarity with a new technique-we are unable to recommend the minimally invasive approach over traditional approaches, in light of the absence of any clinically important benefits identified in this meta-analysis. Future research should ensure studies are methodologically robust using validated clinical and radiologic parameters, as well as patient-reported outcome measures, to assess the long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery.