Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Tehran Heart Cent ; 17(3): 91-102, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252083

ABSTRACT

The catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias is accepted as a first-line treatment as it successfully eliminates about 90.0% of such arrhythmias. One of the most challenging ventricular arrhythmias originates from the left ventricular summit (LVS), a triangular epicardial space with the left main bifurcation as its apex. This area accounts for about 14.0% of LV arrhythmias. The complex anatomy of this region, accompanied by proximity to the major epicardial coronary arteries and the presence of a thick fat pad in this region, renders it a challenging area for catheter ablation. This article presents a review of the anatomy of the LVS and relevant regions and discusses novel mapping and ablation techniques for eliminating LVS ventricular arrhythmias. Additionally, we elaborate on the electrocardiographic (ECG) manifestations of arrhythmias from the LVS and their successful ablation via the direct approach and the adjacent structures.

2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 42(2): 161-165, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30575054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine whether postprocedural antibiotic reduces the risk of infection related to the cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations. METHODS: The present investigation is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded controlled trial. All consecutive patients who presented for new CIED implantation, generator replacement, or upgrade were randomized into the following three groups: (A) no antibiotic, (B) intravenous (IV) antibiotic for 1 day, (C) 1 day IV plus 7 days oral antibiotic. Follow-up was performed on 10-12 days; 1, 3, 6 months; and then every 6 months for 2 years. The primary endpoint was any evidence of infection at the generator pocket or systemic infection related to the procedure at short-term (6-month) and long-term (2-year) follow-ups. RESULTS: Of the 450 patients (72 patients with cardiac resynchronization device) included in the study, the primary endpoint of short-term infection was reached in one patient (0.2%) in group A and no patients in groups B and C. The endpoint of long-term infection was reached in nine patients (2%) with equal frequency between three randomized groups (three patients in each group). On multivariable analysis, the only independent predictor of infection was defibrillator implantation (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-45). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this prospective study showed no benefit for the postoperative antibiotic for the prevention of CIED infection.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Postoperative Care/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Young Adult
3.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 45(3): 128-135, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30072848

ABSTRACT

Infection is an important complication of cardiac implantable electronic device procedures. To further study the factors associated with infection, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 3,205 consecutive patients who had undergone de novo or revision cardiac electronic device implantation at our institution from March 2011 through March 2015. We recorded all infections and specified whether they were related to the characteristics of the patient, device, or procedure. To identify predictors of infection, we performed multivariate analysis. Device infections were identified in 85 patients (2.7%), at a mean follow-up time of 27 ± 11 months. The main predictors of device infection were use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device (odds ratio [OR]=16; 95% CI, 4.14-61.85; P=0.0001), stage 3 chronic kidney disease (OR=9.41; 95% CI, 1.77-50.04; P=0.009), a revision procedure (OR=8.8; 95% CI, 3.37-23.2; P=0.0001), or postoperative hematoma (OR=6.9; 95% CI, 1.58-30.2; P=0.01). We also identified 2 novel predictors of infection: a low body mass index of <20 kg/m2 (OR=1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P=0.005), and use of povidone-iodine rather than chlorhexidine-alcohol for topical antisepsis (OR=4.4; 95% CI, 2.01-9.4; P=0.03). We conclude that comorbidities, device characteristics, procedure types, and postoperative noninfective complications all increase the risk of device infection after a cardiac implantable electronic device procedure.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Device Removal/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Risk Assessment , Female , Humans , Incidence , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...