Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Background: Exposing patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) to all three active chemotherapeutic agents (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil) has improved survival. The benefit of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet is not clearly defined. We evaluated the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients who had received first-line triplet therapy. Methods: The medical records of patients treated on a prospective trial of first-line triplet therapy were reviewed for second-line treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish factors of prognostic significance. Results: Of the 53 patients who received first-line triplet therapy, 28 (53%) received second-line chemotherapy [13 men; 8 with a colon primary; mutant KRAS in 10, wild-type in 15, and unknown status in 3; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ps) of 1 in 16 patients, ps 2 in 3, ps 3 in 2, and unknown in 7; involved organs: liver in 17 patients, lung in 16, and peritoneum in 8]. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of xelox or folfox in 13 patients, xeliri or folfiri in 12, and single-agent irinotecan in 3. Concurrent bevacizumab was given in 16 patients (57%), and cetuximab, in 2 (7%). Median survival was 28.0 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 22.8 months to 33.2 months] for patients receiving second-line therapy and 23.0 months (95% ci: 13.2 months to 32.8 months) for those not receiving it. Best response was partial in 6 patients (21%), stable disease in 11 (39%), and progressive disease in 11 (39%). Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% ci: 2.4 months to 9.6 months), and overall survival was 15 months (95% ci: 9.6 months to 20.4 months). Conclusions: Second-line chemotherapy after first-line triplet therapy in mcrc is feasible and suggests efficacy comparable to that reported for second-line therapy after a doublet, regardless of the agent used.

Osteosarcoma in adolescents and adults: survival analysis with and without lung metastases.

BACKGROUND: Survival data are still limited and controversial about adult patients with osteosarcoma as older group of patients has mostly been excluded from the historical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with osteosarcoma, from 1986 to 2003, in a single center, were reviewed. Survival according to a cutoff age of 40 was studied. Patients with lung metastases were identified. Variables at first lung involvement including time to first lung metastases, multiplicity and size of the metastatic lesions and use of chemotherapy were all analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients, with age range of 14-77 years, were reviewed. Five-year survival is 66% with no difference between patients <40 or >or=40 years. Eighty-five patients, with either synchronous or metachronous lung involvement, have 3-year postlung metastases survival (PLMS) of 30%. Forty-seven patients (55.3%) underwent lung resection with 3-year PLMS of 38% compared with 16% for nonoperated patients (P = 0.00023). Patients who developed lung metastases within a year and have fewer than four lung lesions have better PLMS (P < 0.0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients have identical survival to pediatric population and should have a similar management approach. Complete metastectomy is the key issue for prolonged survival. Time to lung metastases and number of lung lesions are the most important prognostic factors.