Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
IDCases ; 28: e01492, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35402158

ABSTRACT

Influenza induced cardiogenic shock is rare and the majority of reported cases are a result of Influenza A myocarditis. We describe a patient with Influenza B who developed myocarditis and cardiogenic shock, with no known pre-existing heart disease. The patient's disease progressed to include rhabdomyolysis, compartment syndrome, renal failure, and pneumonia. He was successfully managed with Oseltamivir, renal replacement therapy, antimicrobials and intubation. This case is notable due to the rarity of influenza B induced cardiogenic shock and reinforces the importance of recognition and treatment.

2.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 20(1): 455, 2020 10 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that patients with prior myocardial infarction and a reduced ejection fraction benefit from implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). It is unclear whether this benefit is altered by whether or not revascularization is performed prior to ICD implantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study following patients who underwent ICD implantation from 2002 to 2014. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and either primary or secondary prevention ICDs were selected for inclusion. Using the electronic medical record, cardiac catheterization data, revascularization status (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery) were recorded. The outcomes were mortality and ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: There were 606 patients included in the analysis. The mean age was 66.3 ± 10.1 years, 11.9% were women, and the mean LVEF was 30.5 ± 12.0, 58.9% had a primary indication for ICD, 82.0% of the cohort had undergone coronary catheterization prior to ICD implantation. In the overall cohort, there were fewer mortality and ventricular arrhythmia events in patients who had undergone prior revascularization. In patients who had an ICD for secondary prevention, revascularization was associated with a decrease in mortality (HR 0.46, 95% CI (0.24, 0.85) p = 0.015), and a trend towards fewer ventricular arrhythmia (HR 0.62, 95% CI (0.38, 1.00) p = 0.051). There was no association between death or ventricular arrhythmia with revascularization in patients with primary prevention ICDs. CONCLUSION: Revascularization may be beneficial in preventing recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, and should be considered as adjunctive therapy to ICD implantation to improve cardiovascular outcomes.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Cardiomyopathies/therapy , Coronary Artery Bypass , Electric Countershock , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Cardiomyopathies/etiology , Cardiomyopathies/mortality , Clinical Decision-Making , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Defibrillators, Implantable , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Electric Countershock/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/complications , Myocardial Ischemia/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Primary Prevention , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Secondary Prevention , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...