The adherence to and utility of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines for treating COPD among pulmonary specialists: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the evidence-based guidelines promoted by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), the overuse of prescription drugs to manage COPD, particularly inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), remains a persistent challenge. In this real-world study, we evaluated how patients with COPD were divided into ABCD groups based on the 2017 GOLD guidelines, determined the rate of adherence to the GOLD treatment recommendations, described the rate of ICS usage, and determined the rate of triple therapy (TT) prescription. METHODS: The charts of 2291 patients diagnosed with COPD were retrospectively analyzed, of which 1438 matched the eligibility criteria. RESULTS: The average patient age was 69.6 ± 10.9 years; 52% of patients were female. The average COPD assessment test (CAT) score was 18.3 ± 9.1. The ABCD breakdown was as follows: group A 19.5%, group B 64.1%, group C 1.8%, and group D 14.6%. All groups, except group D, showed discordance in COPD treatment relative to the proposed GOLD guidelines. Only 18.9% of group A and 26% of group B were treated in concordance with the guidelines. TT was primarily used in group D (63.3%) and overused in groups A (30.6%) and B (47.8%). ICS was overused in all groups, particularly in groups A (56.2%) and B (67.3%). CONCLUSION: Studies from the last decade have consistently revealed a lack of conformity between what physicians prescribe and what GOLD guidelines recommend. The excessive usage of ICS, which continues despite all the associated adverse effects and the attributable costs, is concerning. The awareness of GOLD guidelines among primary care physicians (PCPs) and respiratory specialists needs to be improved.

The Heterogeneity of COPD Patients in a Community-Based Practice and the Inadequacy of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Criteria: A Real-World Experience.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with differing clinical presentations, which range from an asymptomatic obstructive defect on spirometry to symptomatic normal spirometry. The current standard for diagnosis requires exposure history and the presence of an obstructive ventilatory defect (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] to forced vital capacity [FVC] ratio < 70%) on spirometry. In this real-world study, we analyzed patients with physician-diagnosed COPD, described their characteristics, and evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity of Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria in this population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 2115 patients for eligibility. A total of 1224 patients with physician-diagnosed COPD were selected for this study. The average age was 68.4±11.5 years, with 51% being female. Of the 1224 patients, 18% did not have a history of smoking, 73% had bronchodilator testing, and a significant response of ≥12% was noted in 23% of the COPD patients. Moreover, 43% of the patients met the GOLD criteria for the diagnosis of COPD, whereas the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) and lower limit of normal (LLN)criteria were only able to identify 26%. DISCUSSION: COPD-related mortality is continuing to rise, and it is currently ranked as the third leading cause of death, globally, after cardiovascular diseases and strokes. Despite this alarming statistic, COPD diagnosis is delayed in most cases and can remain undiagnosed, even in smokers. This is partly due to the restrictive GOLD diagnostic criteria, which requires the presence of FEV1/FVC ratio<70. CONCLUSIONS: The recently proposed COPD Genetic Epidemiology (COPDGene®) 2019 definition for COPD will improve and enhance our ability to diagnose COPD earlier and more accurately.

A 68-year-old woman with a diagnosis of asthma and multiple fleeting pulmonary nodules- a case report.

Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell (DIPNECH syndrome) remains unfamiliar to most clinicians even though it was first described almost 30 years ago. Diagnosis is usually confirmed histopathologically after lung biopsy, but often, a diagnosis or suspected diagnosis can be made radiographically. In this paper, we present a case report of a 68-year-old female with shortness of breath and fleeting pulmonary nodules observed on chest CT scan. She was initially misdiagnosed with asthma based on an abnormal pulmonary function test which revealed an obstructive ventilatory defect. The classic radiographic findings of DIPNECH syndrome and the typical patient demographics that should arouse suspicion of a DIPNECH diagnosis were also illustrated. DIPNECH syndrome is a clinicopathological syndrome whereas focal NECH is a pathological diagnosis that is often made incidentally on histological examination and is encountered in a variety of settings, including in resected carcinoid tumors, in the context of reactive changes concomitant with infection, in metastatic cancer, radiation pneumonitis, intra-lobar sequestration, smokers, interstitial lung disease, and lung adenocarcinoma. There are no proven treatments for DIPNECH syndrome. In patients with obstructive ventilatory symptoms, bronchodilators with inhaled steroids are usually prescribed. Some severe cases may require parenteral steroids. Somatostatin analogs (SSA) have also been used in some cases with mixed results. Rapamycin has been used in several cases based on the purported activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in DIPNECH. Some patients with large carcinoid tumors may benefit from resection.