Ankle Arthroplasty-Does Preoperative Fixed Equinus Affect Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Postoperative sagittal range of motion, in particular degree of dorsiflexion, is critical for satisfactory outcomes in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Although there is literature discussing techniques to treat a preoperative fixed equinus we are not aware of any papers presenting patient outcomes. We present patient-reported outcomes for our cohort of patients undergoing TAA with preoperative fixed equinus compared to plantigrade ankles. This is a single surgeon, cohort study of consecutive cases. Cases of primary TAA were identified from a local joint registry which prospectively records Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and patient satisfaction. Revision cases or those with inadequate data were excluded. Patients were classified as fixed equinus or neutral based on both preoperative weightbearing lateral radiographs and clinical records. Overall 259 cases were identified, 92 were excluded leaving 167 cases for analysis (mean follow-up 81.7 months), 147 were classified as neutral and 20 fixed equinus. The fixed equinus group were significantly younger (neutral 63.9 vs equinus 52.9, p < .001). Stiffness was the only FAOS domain that was detectibly different at baseline (neutral 36.6 vs equinus 25.6, p = .044). Final FAOS scores, change from baseline and patient satisfaction was the same in all domains for both groups. There was no difference in revision rates. With the numbers available we did not demonstrate a postoperative difference in outcomes for patients with preoperative fixed equinus.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Radiological Outcomes in Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty With Varus or Valgus Deformity.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that varus deformity does not negatively affect total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) outcomes, but there is a sparsity of evidence for valgus deformity. We present our outcomes using a mobile-bearing prosthesis for neutral, varus, and valgus ankles. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases identified from a local joint registry. In total, 230 cases were classified based on preoperative radiographs as neutral (152 cases), varus greater than 10 degrees (60 cases), or valgus greater than 10 degrees (18 cases). Tibiotalar angle was again measured postoperatively and at final follow-up (mean follow-up of 55.9 months). A total of 164 cases had adequate patient-reported outcome measures data (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Short Form-36 [SF-36] scores, and patient satisfaction) for analysis (mean follow-up of 61.6 months). The groups were similar for body mass index and length of follow-up, but neutral ankles were younger (P = .021). RESULTS: Baseline scores were equal except SF-36 physical health, with valgus ankles scoring lowest (P = .045). Valgus ankles had better postoperative pain (P = .025) and function (P = .012) than neutral. Pre- to postoperative change did not reach statistical significance except physical health, in which valgus performed best (P = .039). Mean final angle for all groups was less than 5 degrees. There was no significant difference in revision rates. CONCLUSION: Our study is consistent with previous evidence that varus deformity does not affect outcome in TAA. In addition, in our cohort, outcomes were satisfactory with valgus alignment. Postoperative coronal radiological alignment was affected by preoperative deformity but within acceptable limits. Coronal plane deformity did not negatively affect radiological or clinical outcomes in TAA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.