ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A wealth of data exists on acceptable mortality and morbidity for valve operations in older patients, yet information documenting quality of life is lacking. METHODS: From October 1974 to May 1998, 2,075 patients aged 65 years and older underwent valve replacement using a porcine bioprosthesis. There were 1,126 men (54.3%) and 949 women (45.7%) with a mean age of 73.9 years (range 65 to 104 years). RESULTS: The elective hospital mortality was 8.5% (158 patients), and urgent/emergent/salvage mortality was 25.8% (54 patients). Follow-up was completed for 1,863 patients (98.2%) and extended from 1 month to 23.0 years (mean 60.8 months) with a cumulative follow-up of 9,442.1 patient-years. At follow-up, surviving patients (n = 849) completed the Short Form-36 Quality of Life Survey. Results showed patients had a more favorable quality of life compared with control subjects matched for age and sex. Functional improvement was significant with 96.3% in New York Heart Association functional class I or II at follow-up. There were 74 valves that failed from all causes (33 aortic and 41 mitral valves). Actuarial freedom from valve failure at 9 years was 94.4%+/-1.1% and at 18 years was 83.7%+/-2.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Valve replacement in older patients provides excellent functional improvement, reduces late cardiac events, and enhances quality of life.
Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Quality of Life , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/surgery , Cause of Death , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve/surgery , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , Survival RateABSTRACT
The issue of bioprosthetic valve durability has become of critical importance as the number of elderly patients requiring valve operation has continued to increase. Our previous study showed bioprosthetic valve durability to be in excess of 83% at 13 years for patients 70 years of age and older at the time of implantation. There is limited follow-up data in the literature beyond this time point, however. Accordingly a retrospective analysis was conducted of all patients with bioprosthetic valves who were 70 years of age and over at the time of implantation. From September 1974 to April 1994, 1007 patients 70 years of age and over underwent valve replacement using a porcine bioprosthesis. The patients ranged in age from 70 to 104 years (mean, 75.6 +/- 4.3 years). There were 549 men (54.5%) and 458 women (45.5%). Preoperatively 98.8% of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Operation was performed as an emergency in 66 patients (6.6%). The hospital mortality was 10.9% (110 patients), with 897 hospital survivors. There were 961 valves at risk. Follow-up extended from 1 month to 18.8 years (mean, 56.6 months). The cumulative follow-up is 4232.3 patient-years. A total of 31 valves failed, 12 in the aortic position and 19 in the mitral position (p < 0.0024). The causes of valve failure have included structural deterioration (16 valves), prosthetic endocarditis (7 valves), nonstructural dysfunction (5 valves), prosthetic thrombosis (1 valve), and other (2 valves).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Actuarial Analysis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/surgery , Bioprosthesis/adverse effects , Bioprosthesis/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mitral Valve/surgery , Prosthesis Failure , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
In total hip arthroplasty, fracture and subsequent premature loosening are directly related to the strength of the cement mantle serving as an interface between bone and prosthesis. The cement has been shown to be weakened by its porosity, which enhances the formation of microfractures that contribute to crack propagation. By means of a vacuum mixing method for preparing the cement, nearly all the porosity can be removed and cement strength enhanced by about 17%.