Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dent Mater J ; 41(4): 511-519, 2022 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35584933

ABSTRACT

To assess the effect of 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) and 6% hydrogen peroxide (HP) home bleaching agents on the translucency and color of monolithic zirconia. Ninety disc specimens were fabricated (diameter, 10 mm) from multi-layered (ML), ultra translucent multi-layered (UTML), and super translucent multi-layered (STML) zirconia blocks at three thicknesses (0.4,1,1.5 mm) (n=5). The samples were divided into two subgroups, which were treated with 6% HP (45 min per day) or 10% CP (8 h per day) for 14 days. The color of specimens was measured before bleaching (T0) and after bleaching on the third (T3), seventh (T7), and 14th (T14) day. Color (∆E) and translucency (TP) changes were calculated. The thickness varieties used in the samples and the bleaching agent types used created statistically significant differences only in TP and ∆E00, respectively (p<0.05). Bleaching agents can affect TP and ∆E. Patients who have zirconia restorations should be careful when using home bleaching agents.


Subject(s)
Bleaching Agents , Ceramics , Carbamide Peroxide , Color , Dental Porcelain , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide , Materials Testing , Surface Properties , Zirconium
2.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc ; 17(2): 183-188, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28584420

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the intra-pulpal temperature changes in adhesive resin cements during polymerization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dentin surface was prepared with extracted human mandibular third molars. Adhesive resin cements (Panavia F 2.0, Panavia SA, and RelyX U200) were applied to the dentin surface and polymerized under IPS e.max Press restoration. K-type thermocouple wire was positioned in the pulpal chamber to measure temperature change (n = 7). The temperature data were recorded (0.0001 sensible) and stored on a computer every 0.1 second for sixteen minutes. Differences between the baseline temperature and temperatures of various time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 minute) were determined and mean temperature changes were calculated. At various time intervals, the differences in temperature values among the adhesive resin cements were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey honestly test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Significant differences were found among the time points and resin cements (P < 0.05). Temperature values of the Pan SA group were significantly higher than Pan F and RelyX (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Result of the study on self-adhesive and self-etch adhesive resin cements exhibited a safety intra-pulpal temperature change.

3.
Dent Mater J ; 36(2): 168-173, 2017 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28090030

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different polymerization cycles on the flexural strengths and microhardness of two denture base materials (Meliodent and Paladent). Heat-polymerized acrylic resin specimens (65.0 mm long×10.0 mm wide×2.5 mm in height) were prepared using different short and long polymerization cycles. After the specimens had been polymerized, they were stored in distilled water at 37±1°C for 24 h. Flexural strength test was performed at a cross-head speed of 5 mm/min and Vickers microhardness was measured. Data were analyzed with a 1-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey test, and Student t-test (α=0.05). The flexural strengths and microhardness were significantly different between Meliodent and Paladent (p<0.05). Significant differences were found among the polymerization cycles in terms of flexural strengths and microhardness (p<0.05). Polymerization with G cycle may be suggested for Meliodent and H cycle may be suggested for Paladent.


Subject(s)
Dental Stress Analysis , Denture Bases , Acrylic Resins , Materials Testing , Pliability , Polymerization
4.
J Adv Prosthodont ; 8(5): 380-387, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27826388

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The storage conditions of impressions affect the dimensional accuracy of the impression materials. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of storage time on dimensional accuracy of five different impression materials by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polyether (Impregum), hydrocolloid (Hydrogum and Alginoplast), and silicone (Zetaflow and Honigum) impression materials were used for impressions taken from an acrylic master model. The impressions were poured and subjected to four different storage times: immediate use, and 1, 3, and 5 days of storage. Line 1 (between right and left first molar mesiobuccal cusp tips) and Line 2 (between right and left canine tips) were measured on a CBCT scanned model, and time dependent mean differences were analyzed by two-way univariate and Duncan's test (α=.05). RESULTS: For Line 1, the total mean difference of Impregum and Hydrogum were statistically different from Alginoplast (P<.05), while Zetaflow and Honigum had smaller discrepancies. Alginoplast resulted in more difference than the other impressions (P<.05). For Line 2, the total mean difference of Impregum was statistically different from the other impressions. Significant differences were observed in Line 1 and Line 2 for the different storage periods (P<.05). CONCLUSION: The dimensional accuracy of impression material is clinically acceptable if the impression material is stored in suitable conditions.

5.
Dent Mater J ; 35(5): 776-781, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27725514

ABSTRACT

The aim of study was to evaluate the effects of multiple firings on the microstructures of zirconia and two ceramics. Vita VM9 (VMZ) and Cerabien ZR (C-Z) ceramics on a zirconia framework and zirconia without veneering ceramic (WO-Z) were evaluated. Firing methods included firing two, five, and ten times (n=10). The effects of multiple firings on the surface hardness of the materials were evaluated using a Vickers hardness (HV) tester. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). After firing five and ten times, the hardness of VM-Z and C-Z increased significantly (p<0.001). The HVs of the Cerabien ZR and Vita VM9 veneering ceramics were similar (p>0.05). In the XRD analysis, zirconia had similar tetragonal (t)-monoclinic (m) phase transformations of Y-TZP after the different firing times. Clinically, multiple firings did not affect the microstructure of zirconia, but the structures of the two ceramics were affected.


Subject(s)
Dental Veneers , Zirconium , Ceramics , Dental Porcelain , Materials Testing , Surface Properties
6.
J Prosthet Dent ; 112(4): 964-71, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24726594

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Adhesive failure between acrylic resin and resilient liner material is commonly encountered in clinical practice. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of 2 different resilient lining materials to an acrylic resin denture base. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-six dumbbell-shaped specimens were fabricated from heat-polymerized acrylic resin, and 3 mm of the material was cut from the thin midsection. The specimens were divided into 6 groups according to their surface treatments: no surface treatment (control group), 36% phosphoric acid etching (acid group), erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser (laser group), airborne-particle abrasion with 50-µm Al2O3 particles (abrasion group), an acid+laser group, and an abrasion+laser group. The specimens in each group were divided into 2 subgroups according to the resilient lining material used: heat-polymerized silicone based resilient liner (Molloplast B) and autopolymerized silicone-based resilient liner (Ufi Gel P). After all of the specimens had been polymerized, they were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 1 week. A tensile bond strength test was then performed. Data were analyzed with a 2-way ANOVA, and the Sidak multiple comparison test was used to identify significant differences (α=.05). The effects of the surface treatments and resilient lining materials on the surface of the denture base resin were examined with scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The tensile bond strength was significantly different between Molloplast B and Ufi Gel P (P<.001). The specimens of the acid group had the highest tensile bond strength, whereas those of the abrasion group had the lowest tensile bond strength. The scanning electron microscopy observations showed that the application of surface treatments modified the surface of the denture base resin. CONCLUSIONS: Molloplast B exhibited significantly higher bond strength than Ufi Gel P. Altering the surface of the acrylic resin denture base with 36% phosphoric acid etching increased bond strength.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Dental Materials/chemistry , Denture Bases , Denture Liners , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Dental Etching/methods , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Dimethylpolysiloxanes/chemistry , Humans , Lasers, Solid-State , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Phosphoric Acids/chemistry , Polymerization , Silicone Elastomers/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Temperature , Tensile Strength , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
7.
J Prosthet Dent ; 111(1): 71-8, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24161257

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Acrylic resin denture fracture is common in prosthodontic practice. When fractured denture bases are repaired, recurrent fractures frequently occur at the repair surface interface or adjacent areas. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the flexural strength of the acrylic resin denture base repaired with heat-polymerized acrylic resin, autopolymerizing resin, and light-polymerized acrylic resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-six specimens of heat-polymerized acrylic resin were prepared according to the American Dental Association Specification No. 12 (65.0 × 10.0 × 2.5 mm) and sectioned into halves to create a repair gap (3.0 × 10 × 2.5 mm). The sectioned specimens were divided into 3 groups according to their repair materials. The specimens from each group were divided into 4 subgroups according to their surface treatments: a control group without any surface treatment; an experimental group treated with methyl methacrylate monomer (MMA group); an experimental group treated with airborne-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide particles of 250-µm particle size (abrasion group); and an experimental group treated with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (laser group). After the surface treatments, the 3 materials were placed into the repair gaps and then polymerized. After all of the specimens had been ground and polished, they were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 1 week and subjected to a 3-point bend test. Data were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance, and the Tukey honestly significant difference test was performed to identify significant differences (α=.05). The effects of the surface treatments and repair resins on the surface of the denture base resin were examined with scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Significant differences were found among the groups in terms of repair resin type (P<.001). All surface-treated specimens had higher flexural strength than controls, except the surface treated with the methyl methacrylate in the heat-polymerized group. A significant difference between the control and abrasion groups (P=.013) was found. The scanning electron microscopy observations showed that the application of surface treatments modified the surface of the denture base resin. CONCLUSIONS: The repair procedure with heat-polymerized resin exhibited significantly higher flexural strength than that of the autopolymerized and light-polymerized resins. In addition, the airborne-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide particles of 250-µm particle size improved the flexural strength of the specimens tested.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Denture Bases , Denture Repair , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Dental Etching/methods , Dental Polishing/methods , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Hot Temperature , Humans , Lasers, Solid-State , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives , Materials Testing , Methylmethacrylate/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Particle Size , Pliability , Polymerization , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Temperature , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
8.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater ; 101(5): 878-81, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23359518

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate of flexural strength of some adhesive resin cements. Three dual-cure composite resin cements (Nexus 3; Variolink II, Panavia F) were prepared. The manufacturer's mixing directions for the cements were followed. Adhesive resin cement was mixed, placed in the rectangular portion of the mold. Fifteen specimens were prepared for each cements. The cements were light-activated with light lamp for 40 s on both and top and bottom surfaces. The each cement specimens were divided into three groups according to time of storage and stored in distilled water for 24 h, 15, and 30 days. Total 45 specimens were stored at 37°C (98.6 0F) in distilled water for 24 h, 15, and 30 days prior to tests. The flexural strength was tested with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min (0.02 in.) The maximum load was recorded as MPa. The results were analyzed by Analysis of Variance and Duncan test. The Panavia F resin cements content Bisphenol A was showed the highest flexural strength (80.80 MPa) (11.71 ksi) for 24 h. The lowest flexural strength was observed in Nexus 3 (51.00 MPa) (7.39 ksi). It was found significant interaction of material and time (p < 0.05). The types of cement and time of storage was statistically significant on the flexural strengths (p < 0.001).


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Polyurethanes/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Biomechanical Phenomena , Elasticity , Humans , Materials Testing , Stress, Mechanical , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...