Eligibility criteria to cisplatin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Egyptian expert opinion.

Introduction: The use of cisplatin in clinical practice in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is limited by its toxicity and acquired resistance, which makes the decision-making process of its prescription multifactorial. Methods: An Egyptian expert panel (comprising nine Egyptian oncologists) meeting was held after a comprehensive literature review on the use of cisplatin in HNSCC. The panel aimed to develop a consensus on evidence-based recommendations for receiving cisplatin in the chemoradiotherapy management of HNSCC in Egyptian clinical practice. Results: The panel indicated that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) > 2, creatinine clearance (CCR) < 50 ml/min, neuropathy grade ≥ 2, pre-existing hearing loss or tinnitus ≥2, hematological problems (platelets < 100,000/mm3, neutrophils < 1500/mm, and hemoglobin < 9 g/dl), and heart failure of New York Heart Association Classes III or IV (even if cardiovascular therapy is optimized); are all absolute contraindications to receiving cisplatin. On the other hand, relative contraindications to cisplatin according to the panel were an ECOG PS of 2, age more than 70 years, CCR between 50 and 60 ml/min, grade 1 neuropathy, grade 1 hearing loss, involuntary weight loss of ≥20% of body weight, Child-Pugh Scores B and C, previous induction chemotherapy, and heart failure of New York Heart Association Classes I or II with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%. The panel agreed that the socioeconomic status of patients should be considered when prescribing cisplatin to HNSCC patients. Conclusion: Our discussion resulted in a set of evidence-based recommendations for cisplatin eligibility criteria in patients of HNSCC in Egypt.

The first Middle East and North Africa expert consensus recommendations for the management of advanced colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked as the third most prevalent and the second deadliest cancer worldwide. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, the number of CRC cases increased over the past decades and will nearly double by 2030. The lack of clear MENA guidelines for the management of patients with CRC represents a step backwards in the fight against this burden. Therefore a panel of 24 MENA experts in the field of gastrointestinal oncology developed, using a Delphi process, the first consensus recommendations for the management of patients with advanced CRC. Forty-seven different statements were formulated in the areas of epidemiology, screening, biomarkers and treatment. These recommendations will guide, standardize and unify the management of this cancer in the MENA region.

Estrogen Receptor Gene Polymorphism as a Possible Genetic Risk Factor for Treatment Response in ER-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

Estrogen receptor-α (ESR1) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been related to breast cancer (BC) susceptibility. In this retrospective study we investigated ESR1 SNPs in association with survival and treatment response in BC patients. Seven ESR1 SNPs were genotyped using TaqMan probe assay in 100 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks of Egyptian ER+BC patients. Log-binomial regression was used to assess the association of 5 ESR1 SNPs with relative risk of non-response to adjuvant-hormonal treatment. We compared the performance of five machine learning classification models for prediction of treatment response. Predictive models were developed using rs1801132, rs2228480, and rs9322354 that were significantly associated with increased risk for non-response along with the relevant clinical features. Survival analysis was performed to detect prognostic significance of ESR1 SNPs in ESR+BC patients. rs1801132 (C), rs2228480 (A), and rs9322354 (G) minor alleles significantly increased the risk of non-response to tamoxifen by more than 81, 84, and 117%, respectively, in ER+BC patients on anthracycline/anthracycline-taxanes-based chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox regression survival analysis revealed that rs1801132 (C) and large tumor size were independent predictors for poor survival outcome in ER+BC. The best response predictive model was a combination random forest, K-nearest neighbor, and decision tree having an area under the curve of 0.94 and an accuracy of 90.8%. Our proposed predictive model based on ESR1 rs1801132, rs2228480, and rs9322354 SNPs represents a promising genetic risk stratification for selection patients who could benefit from tamoxifen therapy in such a way that might facilitate personalized medicine required to improve ER+BC patients' outcome.

Targeted photoimmunotherapy based on photosensitizer-antibody conjugates for multiple myeloma treatment.

Despite the high in vitro efficacy of photodynamic therapeutics, lack of tumor targeting significantly reduces their in vivo efficacy and thus limits their clinical use. Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) is a new synthetic strategy to target and treat cancer by photodynamic therapy (PDT). In this study, we describe design and synthesis of a third-generation photosensitizer comprising a PEGylated-phthalocyanine star-polymer photosensitizer that covalently bound to a myeloma tumor-selective antibody (MAb) via the carbodiimide chemistry. The free photosensitizer demonstrated a minimum dark toxicity when tested in mammalian myeloma cell line (SP2/OR); and a moderate phototoxicity after irradiation with non thermal laser red light as a result of light-induced production of cytotoxic singlet oxygen species. Covalent attachment of the photosensitizer (Pc) to the MAb resulted in a significantly enhanced phototoxicity. This is mainly ascribed to the fact that internalization enhances phototoxicity of Pc-MAb bioconjugates. The radioactivated photoimmuno-conjugates 131I(PcMAb) demonstrated the highest phototoxicity to myeloma cells. The suggested bioconjugates are promising candidates as multiple therapeutic models for in vivo treatment of myeloma.

Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in Egyptian non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A comparative study for four different techniques of detection (Flowcytometry, CellSearch, Quantitative Real-time PCR and Cytomorphology).

PURPOSE: We assessed CTCs counts in NMCRC patients using four different techniques. METHODS: CTCs were detected in 63 NMCRC patients, 40 benign bowel diseases (BBD) and 40 normal controls (NC) using, flow-cytometry (FCM), CellSearch (CS), cytomorphology and quantitative real time (qPCR) for CK19, MUC1, CD44, CD133, ALDH1 expression. Results were correlated to progression free (PFS) and overall (OS). RESULTS: Positive CTCs (≥4 cells /7.5 mL blood) were detected in 50.8% (32/63) NMCRC by FCM and 7.5% (3/40) BBD (p < .001). CTCs were detected in 34/63 (54%) NMCRC, 4/40 (10%) BBD (p < .001) by CS. CK19, MUC1, CD44, CD133 and ALDH1 were expressed in 35 (55.6%), 29 (46.0%), 28 (44.4%), 26 (41.3%) and 25 (41.3%) cases of NMCRC. In BBD 4/40 (10%) cases expressed CK19, MUC1 and CD44, while 2/40 (5%) expressed CD133. Cytomorphology showed the lowest sensitivity (47.6%) and specificity (90%) for CTCs detection. The combined use of FCM or CS with CTCs-mRNA markers improved the sensitivity and specificity to 68.3%, and 95.0%; respectively. Positive CTCs and mRNA markers expression were significantly associated with shorter 5-yr PFS and OS. In multivariate analysis, CTCs mRNA markers were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Enumeration of CTCs by FCM and RNA expression for specific colon cancer markers are comparable to CS regarding sensitivity and specificity. CTCs also represent novel therapeutic targets for NMCRC cases.

Efficacy and Toxicity of Metronomic Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Egyptian Experience.

BACKGROUND: Metronomic chemotherapy (MC) has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We therefore tested the efficacy and toxicity of MC in pretreated MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective phase II study included 50 patients with heavily pretreated MBC who received MC in the form of continuous oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg/day and oral methotrexate 2.5 mg twice per day on days 1 and 2 every week. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary end points were response rate, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were assessed. One patient achieved complete response and 10 patients had partial response, whereas 19 patients had stable disease. The median PFS was 5 months, whereas the median OS was 7 months. Patients with negative progesterone receptors, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 1, achieving response, and those who developed leucopenia, neutropenia, and anemia had significant prolonged PFS, whereas patients with early stage at presentation, receiving < 5 previous treatment lines, achieving response, and experiencing anemia with MC had significant superior OS. In multivariate analysis, achieving response, PS 1, a longer time interval from initial diagnosis until starting MC, and anemia were independent prognostic factors for longer PFS. Initial stage at presentation, number of previous treatment lines, and response were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: MC is an attractive treatment approach that is effective and less toxic. There are certain groups of patients who seem to benefit more, especially those who experienced toxicity with treatment. Larger trials are warranted to assess this approach early in the course of the disease and with other more active agents.