Systemic White Blood Cell Count as a Biomarker for Malignant Cerebral Edema in Large Vessel Ischemic MCA Stroke.

OBJECTIVES: Large middle cerebral artery (MCA) strokes remain a major cause for mortality and morbidity all over the world, and therefore early identification of patients with the highest risk for malignant cerebral edema is crucial for early intervention. Neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR) and peripheral total white blood cell (WBC) count are inflammatory markers done routinely for all patients, and this study evaluated the use of NLR and elevated white blood cell count within the first 24 h of MCA ischemic stroke onset, with the absence of significant hemorrhagic transformation, to predict malignant cerebral edema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 156 patients with large MCA strokes were included. We collected demographic, clinical, radiological data, and NLR and WBCs within the first 24 h from admission.We excluded patients who had any underlying infections diagnosed 7 days before or within 72 h after admission. We used a body temp of 38 C or more, abnormal CXR or abnormal urine analysis within the first 72 h to exclude patients with possible infections.We excluded immune-compromised patients and patients on steroid therapy. We compared the NLR and WBC count in patients who developed malignant cerebral edema versus the patients who did not. NLR > 3.5 and < 3.5 was used for comparison. We then conducted multivariate logistic regression models to explore the relationship between cerebral edema, WBCs and NLR count simultaneously. RESULTS: NLR, WBC, radiological involvement of more than 50% of MCA territory infarction on presentation, hyperdense MCA sign, and NIH stroke scale were all significantly higher in patients with malignant cerebral edema within the first 24 h. Using univariate logistic regression, NLR performs better than WBC when predicting the occurrence of malignant cerebral edema (AUC = 0.74 vs. 0.62). However, NIH stroke scale scores, and radiological involvement of more than 50% of MCA territory infarction on the first 24 h of presentation on CT scan both showed better discriminative performance for malignant cerebral edema than NLR (AUC = 0.84 and 0.76, respectively). When combined, NLR > 3.5 paired with the NIH stroke scale score had the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.87). CONCLUSION: NLR > 3.5 can be used for early prognostication in patients with large vessel MCA ischemic strokes with no significant hemorrhagic transformation within the first 24 h regardless if they had reperfusion therapy or not. Combining NLR of > 3.5 in addition to high NIHSS provided the best predictive model in our study. Further studies are needed to further develop the best predictive model in diverse populations.

COVID-19 and stroke, a case series and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases continue to increase around the World. Typical symptoms include fever and respiratory illness but a constellation of multisystem involvement including central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) have been reported with COVID-19. Acute ischemic strokes (AIS) have also been reported as a complication. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, laboratory results and imaging results of four patients with COVID-19 who had AIS. RESULTS: All four patients were =< 60 years, had hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to pneumonia, elevated D-dimer and inflammatory markers. CONCLUSION: Ischemic strokes are known complications in patients with severe COVID-19.

Treatment of cerebral aneurysms in children: analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database.

UNLABELLED: OBJECT.: Endovascular coiling and surgical clipping are viable treatment options of cerebral aneurysms. Outcome data of these treatments in children are limited. The objective of this study was to determine hospital mortality and complication rates associated with surgical clipping and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms in children, and to evaluate the trend of hospitals' use of these treatments. METHODS: The authors identified a cohort of children admitted with the diagnoses of cerebral aneurysms and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage from the Kids' Inpatient Database for the years 1998 through 2009. Hospital-associated complications and in-hospital mortality were compared between the treatment groups and stratified by aneurysmal rupture status. A multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent variables associated with in-hospital mortality. The Cochrane-Armitage test was used to assess the trend of hospital use of these operations. RESULTS: A total of 1120 children were included in this analysis; 200 (18%) underwent aneurysmal clipping and 920 (82%) underwent endovascular coiling. Overall in-hospital mortality was higher in the surgical clipping group compared with the coil embolization group (6.09% vs 1.65%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.52, 95% CI 0.97-6.53, p = 0.05). The risk of postoperative stroke or hemorrhage was similar between the two treatment groups (p = 0.86). Pulmonary complications and systemic infection were higher in the surgical clipping population (p < 0.05). The rate of US hospitals' use of endovascular coiling has significantly increased over the years included in this study (p < 0.0001). Teaching hospitals were associated with a lower risk of death (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.46; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although both treatments are valid, endovascular coiling was associated with fewer deaths and shorter hospital stays than clip placement. The trend of hospitals' use of coiling operations has increased in recent years.

Stroke mimics under the drip-and-ship paradigm.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggested better outcomes associated with the drip-and-ship paradigm for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with thrombolysis. We hypothesized that a higher rate of stroke mimics (SM) among AIS treated in nonspecialized stroke centers that are transferred to comprehensive centers is responsible for such outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated with thrombolysis according to the admission criteria were reviewed in a single comprehensive stroke center over 1 academic year (July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012). Information on the basic demographic, hospital complications, psychiatric diagnoses, and discharge disposition was collected. We identified those patients who were treated at a facility and then transferred to the tertiary center (ie, drip-and-ship paradigm). In addition to comparative and adjusted analysis to identify predictors for SM, a stratified analysis by the drip-and-ship status was performed. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients were treated with thrombolysis for AIS included in this analysis; 20 (16.7%) were discharged with the final diagnosis of SM; 14 of those had conversion syndrome and 6 patients had other syndromes (seizures, migraine, and hypoglycemia). Patients with SM were younger (55.6 ± 15.0 versus 69.4 ± 14.9, P = .0003) and more likely to harbor psychiatric diagnoses (45% versus 9%; P ≤ .0001). Eighteen of 20 SM patients (90%) had the drip-and-ship treatment paradigm compared with 65% of those with AIS (P = .02). None of the SM had hemorrhagic complications, and all were discharged to home. Predictors of SM on adjusted analysis included the drip-and-ship paradigm (odds ratio [OR] 12.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78, 92.1) and history of any psychiatric illness (OR 12.08; 95% CI 3.14, 46.4). Eighteen of 83 drip-and-ship patients (21.7%) were diagnosed with SM compared with 2 of 37 patients (5.4%) presented directly to the hub hospital (P = .02). CONCLUSION: The drip-and-ship paradigm and any psychiatric history predict the diagnosis of SM. None of the SM had thrombolysis-related complications, and all were discharged to home. These findings may explain the superior outcomes associated with the drip-and-ship paradigm in the treatment for AIS.

Traumatic carotid-rosenthal fistula treated with Jostent Graftmaster.

Traumatic injuries of the carotid artery may result in severe morbidity and mortality. The most common location of carotid artery injury is the cavernous segment, which may result in fistulous connection to the cavernous sinus and ophthalmic veins, which in turn lead to pressure symptoms in the ipsilateral orbit. Unlike the commonly reported direct traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula, we describe an unusual case of a 38-year-old man presented with a traumatic brain injury led to a fistula connection between the cavernous carotid artery and the ipsilateral basal vein of Rosenthal, with eventual drainage to the straight and transverse sinuses. The basal vein of Rosenthal is usually formed from confluence of anterior and middle cerebral veins deep in the Sylvian fissure and drain the insular cortex and the cerebral peduncles to the vein of Galen. Immediate endovascular deployment of a covered stent in the cavernous carotid artery allowed sealing the laceration site. Three months follow up showed a non-focal neurological examination and healed carotid laceration over the covered stent.

How Safe is Eptifibatide during Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting?

BACKGROUND: Glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibitors are occasionally utilized during carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the presence or absence of a visualized intra-operative thrombus. OBJECTIVE: We assess the hemorrhagic and clinical outcomes associated with the use of eptifibatide during CAS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on patients with the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis underwent CAS in a single center. We identified those who received intravenous eptifibatide intra-operatively and compared to the rest of the cohort. Hemorrhagic outcomes included intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or groin hematoma that occurred during the hospital stay. RESULTS: In this analysis, 81 patients had CAS during a 3-year span; 16 of those had received 15 mg of intravenous eptifibatide intra-operatively. The mean age of the treated and untreated patients was similar (65.6 ± 13.4 versus 65.4 ± 10.2; P = 0.13). One patient (1.2%) in this series had ICH in the perioperative period that occurred in the non-eptifibatide group. Five patients (6.2%) in this series had groin hematoma; only one in the non-eptifibatide group required surgical repair. No mortality was reported and clinical outcomes including discharge modified Rankin scale, NIH stroke scale, as well as discharge destination were similar in both groups. A stratified analysis among those who underwent an urgent CAS showed no significant differences in the risks of hemorrhages or any clinical outcome (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of eptifibatide during CAS is safe. The risk of any hemorrhagic complication is rare in this series; however, a prospective study to validate this observation will be helpful.