Robotic Totally Endoscopic Off-Pump Unroofing of Myocardial Bridge: Early Experience and Midterm Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial bridging (MB) occurs when a coronary artery, commonly the left anterior descending (LAD), has an intramyocardial course. In symptomatic patients who fail medical therapy, surgical unroofing can provide symptomatic relief by improving coronary blood flow. We present a series of patients undergoing robotic totally endoscopic beating-heart MB unroofing. METHODS: There were 34 patients with an LAD-MB who failed medical therapy and underwent robotic totally endoscopic, off-pump unroofing between January 2017 and October 2023. Patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and underwent provocative coronary angiography to confirm hemodynamic significance. We reviewed perioperative outcomes and contacted patients for midterm follow-up, including completion of a modified Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). RESULTS: The mean age was 48 ± 8 years, and 56% were female patients. One patient had prior septal myectomy via sternotomy. All patients had significant dobutamine Pd/Pa reduction on preoperative coronary angiography. One patient had atrial fibrillation and underwent concomitant ablation with left atrial appendage ligation. The mean procedure time was 140 ± 69 min. All were completed totally endoscopically off-pump without intraoperative conversions. The mean MB length was 4.5 ± 1.4 cm, and the mean depth was 1.6 ± 0.9 cm. Of the patients, 76% were extubated in the operating room. The mean intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were 0.97 ± 0.58 and 1.73 ± 1.1 days, respectively. There were no mortalities or strokes. There was 1 postoperative take-back for bleeding. At midterm follow-up (19 ± 14 months), 28 patients completed the SAQ; 86% reported "much less angina" during activity compared with before surgery, and 93% reported taking no antianginal medication since surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriate patients with hemodynamically significant LAD-MB who fail medical therapy, robotic beating-heart unroofing is possible with good outcomes. Further studies are warranted.

Angiographic Coronary Slow Flow Is Not a Valid Surrogate for Invasively Diagnosed Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries is frequently caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Consensus diagnostic criteria for CMD include baseline angiographic slow flow by corrected TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) frame count (cTFC), but correlations between slow flow and CMD measured by invasive coronary function testing (CFT) are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between cTFC and invasive CFT for CMD. METHODS: Adults with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries underwent invasive CFT with thermodilution-derived baseline coronary blood flow, coronary flow reserve (CFR), and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). CMD was defined as abnormal CFR (<2.5) and/or abnormal IMR (≥25). cTFC was measured from baseline angiography; slow flow was defined as cTFC >25. Correlations between cTFC and baseline coronary flow and between CFR and IMR and associations between slow flow and invasive measures of CMD were evaluated, adjusted for covariates. All patients provided consent. RESULTS: Among 508 adults, 49% had coronary slow flow. Patients with slow flow were more likely to have abnormal IMR (36% vs 26%; P = 0.019) but less likely to have abnormal CFR (28% vs 42%; P = 0.001), with no difference in CMD (46% vs 51%). cTFC was weakly correlated with baseline coronary blood flow (r = -0.35; 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.27), CFR (r = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.28), and IMR (r = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.07-0.24). In multivariable models, slow flow was associated with lower odds of abnormal CFR (adjusted OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary slow flow was weakly associated with results of invasive CFT and should not be used as a surrogate for the invasive diagnosis of CMD.

Left Ventricular Pressure Ratio Predicts In-Hospital Outcomes in Hospitalized Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Given the risk of hemodynamic compromise in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients undergoing left heart catheterization (LHC), there is a need for a simple parameter that can predict clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that left ventricular pressure ratio (LVPR), calculated as left ventricle systolic/left ventricle end-diastolic pressure, is a strong predictor of hemodynamic collapse in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive hospitalized HFrEF patients undergoing combined LHC and right heart catheterization (RHC) at a single institution from 2015-2017 was performed. LVPR was compared with standard RHC hemodynamic variables. The primary outcome was in-hospital escalation of therapy, defined as ≥40 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP), SBP ≤90 mm Hg for ≥15 minutes, start or escalation of vasoactive medications, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or in-hospital death. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed for prediction of the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were included in this study. ROC analysis determined an optimal cut-off value of ≤3.96, which correlated with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.65 (sensitivity, 45.9%; specificity, 83.2%; correctly classified, 64.9%). AUC was similar to other variables obtained using RHC. In-hospital survival free of escalation of therapy was lower in the low LVPR group vs the high LVPR group (0% vs 33%, respectively; P<.01). CONCLUSION: LVPR is an easily measured index obtained during LHC that can risk stratify hospitalized patients with HFrEF at the time of LHC.

The relationship between coronary microvascular dysfunction, atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a new frontier in cardiovascular disease and an important contributor to myocardial ischemia. A high prevalence of CMD is shown in heart failure, however, the cause-and-effect relationship between CMD and atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. We hypothesize that CMD is associated with AF and increases susceptibility to the co-existence of AF and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: Our study examined the relationship between CMD, AF, and HFpEF in all patients who underwent invasive coronary physiology studies for assessment of chest pain or dyspnea. CMD was defined as impaired coronary flow reserve (CFR) without obstructive coronary disease. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (mean age 60±12 years, 68.8% female, median follow up of 2.2 years) were studied. Patients with AF (61%) or HFpEF (62%), or both (71%) were more likely to have CMD than those patients without these conditions. Of the patients with AF and abnormal CFR, 91% had HFpEF. CMD was a predictor of AF with concomitant HFpEF (OR 4.38, P=0.02). Our clinical outcome analysis demonstrated that patients with CMD, AF or HFpEF had lower survival free of HF hospitalization than those patients without (P<0.05). AF (OR 5.5, P=0.02), diabetes, older age, female gender, and higher heart rate were predictors of CMD. CONCLUSION: CMD is highly prevalent in patients with AF with or without HFpEF. CMD is associated with poor clinical outcomes and the co-existence of AF and HFpEF. Understanding of the association between CMD and AF is important for developing an effective treatment strategy and the risk stratification for the prevention of AF in patients with CMD and vice versa.