Prognostic significance of IgG4+ plasma cell infiltrates following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) tissue following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) reflect alterations in the tumor immunoenvironment. The presence and role of plasma cells in this process are poorly understood. Our aim was to characterize the IgG4+ plasma cell population in EAC following CRT. Seventy-one esophagectomy specimens post-CRT were compared with a surgery-only group of 31 EACs. The distribution, density, and ratio of IgG4+ and IgG+ plasma cells were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with clinicopathologic features, treatment response, and survival. In the CRT group, the presence of higher numbers of IgG4+ (≥ median of 94/high-power field) and IgG+ (≥ median of 225/high-power field) plasma cells and increased IgG4+/IgG+ ratio (≥ median of 41%) within ulcers was associated with complete or near-complete treatment response (P = .0077, P = .0503, and P = .0063, respectively). Lower tumor grade, smaller tumor size, and higher levels of IgG4+ plasma cells in posttherapy ulcers significantly correlated with better overall survival, whereas pretherapy clinical stage, posttherapy pathologic stage, smaller tumor size, and lower tumor grade were associated with longer recurrence-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that both posttherapy pathologic stage and high IgG4+ plasma cells in ulcers were independent predictors of overall survival (P = .05 and P = .01), whereas only posttherapy pathologic stage was associated with recurrence-free survival (P < .01). This is the first study describing a dense IgG4+ plasma cell infiltrate in EAC following CRT. The presence of increased IgG4+ plasma cells may be a novel reliable factor to predict prognosis of EAC patients following CRT.

Hemosuccus pancreaticus due to a noninflammatory pancreatic pseudotumor.

CONTEXT: Hemosuccus pancreaticus is a rare source of gastrointestinal bleeding, the most frequent cause of which is pancreatitis, followed by tumors, but nearly all these tumors are true neoplasms, and not pseudotumors. Furthermore, nearly all pseudotumors of the pancreas and retroperitoneum are inflammatory. CASE REPORT: We present a case of hemosuccus pancreaticus associated with a nonneoplastic noninflammatory pseudotumor of the pancreas. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic pseudotumors are not always inflammatory and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with hemosuccus pancreaticus.

Correlation of ALOX15 expression with eosinophilic or reflux esophagitis in a cohort of pediatric patients with esophageal eosinophilia.

The differential diagnosis between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is often challenging. We recently showed that the ALOX15 protein is expressed in 95% of esophageal biopsies from patients with a definitive diagnosis of EoE. Here we correlated ALOX15 expression with the clinical classification of EoE or GERD in a cohort of consecutive pediatric patients (n = 62) with at least 1 esophageal biopsy containing at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/HPF). The patients were categorized into the following groups: (1) at least 15 eos/HPF in the distal esophagus only (n = 24), (2) at least 15 eos/HPF in the proximal esophagus only (n = 5), and (3) at least 15 eos/HPF in the distal and proximal biopsies (n = 33). Control groups included patients with GERD with biopsies containing 6 to 15 eos/HPF (n = 9), patients with GERD with 5 eos/HPF or less (n = 15), patients with candida esophagitis (n = 15), and patients with normal biopsies (n = 15). ALOX15 was positive in 90.5% of patients with EoE (13/16 in group 1, 4/4 in group 2, 31/33 in group 3) versus 44% of patients with GERD (4/8 in group 1, 0/1 in group 2, and 0/0 in group 3), 2 of 9 (22%) of patients with 6 to 15 eos/HPF, and was negative in all patients with GERD with biopsies containing 5 eos/HPF or less, all patients with candida esophagitis, and all normal controls. In conclusion, ALOX15 is a sensitive marker of EoE; however, subpopulations of patients with GERD with >5 eos/HPF also express ALOX15. Positive ALOX15 expression is more prevalent in EoE than in GERD and may prove to be a useful diagnostic marker in patients with discrepant biopsy findings between the proximal and distal esophagus.

Assessment of liver fibrosis by transient elastography in persons with hepatitis C virus infection or HIV-hepatitis C virus coinfection.

BACKGROUND: Transient elastography is a novel, noninvasive method for staging liver fibrosis. We compared elastography with histologic methods among hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV-coinfected participants in an urban, predominantly black study population. METHODS: Participants recruited from the AIDS Linked to the Intravenous Experience and the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort studies underwent elastography to determine liver stiffness measurements. Liver biopsy specimens were staged F0-F4 in accordance with the Metavir score. Diagnostic accuracy and determination of liver stiffness cutoff values, compared with histologic methods, were determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Logistic regression methods identified parameters associated with discordant classification status. RESULTS: Of 192 participants, 139 (72%) were coinfected with HIV and HCV, 121 (63%) had insignificant fibrosis, and 48 (25%) had cirrhosis. Overall, the area-under-the-curve receiver operating characteristic was 0.87 for detection of both significant fibrosis (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.92) and cirrhosis (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.93). With use of cutoff values of 9.3 kPa for fibrosis and 12.3 kPa for cirrhosis, 79%-83% of participants were correctly classified by liver stiffness measurement (compared with histologic methods); accuracy appeared to be higher among HIV-uninfected participants than among HIV-infected participants. Most discordance occurred when liver stiffness measurements indicated liver disease and histologic examination did not (in 16% of participants); the patients with these discordant results were more likely to have attributes that increased the odds of significant fibrosis, such as elevated serum fibrosis markers or HIV-related immunosuppression, compared with persons in whom low fibrosis was predicted by both examination of a biopsy specimen and elastography. CONCLUSIONS: For most HCV-infected persons, fibrosis stage predicted by elastography is similar to that predicted by examination of a biopsy specimen. Elastography-based measurement of liver stiffness holds promise to expand liver disease screening and monitoring, particularly among injection drug users.