Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Food Microbiol ; 84: 103237, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31421774

ABSTRACT

Between 1991 and 2014 the per capita notification rate of salmonellosis in Australia increased from 31.9 to 69.7 cases per 100,000 people. Salmonella Typhimurium accounted for nearly half the human cases until the end of 2014. In this study, we used cluster analysis tools to compare S. Typhimurium isolates from a chicken-meat study with those reported to the National Enteric Pathogen Surveillance System (NEPSS) from the coincident human and non-human populations. There was limited phage type diversity within all populations and a lack of specificity of MLVA profiling within phage types. The chicken-meat study isolates were not significantly clustered with the human cases and at least 7 non-human sources, based on typing profiles (PT/MLVA combination), could be implicated as a source of human cases during the same period. In the absence of a strong surveillance system representative of all putative sources, MLVA and phage typing alone or in combination are insufficient to identify the source of human cases.


Subject(s)
Bacteriophage Typing , Disease Outbreaks , Salmonella Phages/classification , Salmonella typhimurium/classification , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Cattle , Chickens , Cluster Analysis , Humans , Minisatellite Repeats , Poultry/microbiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/diagnosis , Salmonella Food Poisoning/microbiology , Salmonella Infections/diagnosis , Salmonella Infections/microbiology , Salmonella typhimurium/virology
2.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 85(14)2019 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31053585

ABSTRACT

Detection of salmonellae within poultry environments is an important component of many food safety programs, but sampling approaches vary greatly and may not enable the detection of salmonellae when bacteria are present at a low prevalence or concentration. Intensive longitudinal sampling within caged sheds enabled us to undertake a longitudinal analysis of the spatial distribution of salmonellae in caged shed environments. Both the number of samples collected and location of sample collection within a poultry shed were important to ensure the best chance of detecting Salmonella spp. Differences in the within-shed spatial distribution of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium [χ2(27, 1,538) = 54.4; P < 0.001] and Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Infantis [χ2(27, 1,538) = 79.8; P < 0.0001] were identified. More than one Salmonella enterica serovar was detected in each shed on the same sampling occasion; 5% of all samples contained more than one serovar. Samples collected on the north side of the shed (odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.68), on the sheltered side of the shed (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.26-2.89), and during winter (OR, 48.41; 95% CI, 23.56-104.19) were more likely to be positive for salmonellae. The within-shed differences observed in the both the sample prevalence and spatial location of the serovar detected indicate that there are important shed microenvironmental factors that influence the survival and/or distribution of salmonellae. These factors should be taken into consideration when environmental surveillance is undertaken for salmonellae in flocks housed in cage sheds.IMPORTANCE Routine epidemiological surveillance for salmonellae in poultry relies initially on environmental sampling. Intensive, spatially homogenous sampling, as conducted within this study, confirmed that the sampling methodology conducted within a poultry environment is a nontrivial part of sampling design. The frequency of sampling is especially important when the prevalence of Salmonella spp. is low. These factors must be taken into consideration in the design of studies for the detection of salmonellae in poultry sheds.


Subject(s)
Chickens , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella typhimurium/isolation & purification , Animals , Prevalence , Victoria/epidemiology
3.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0201031, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30024964

ABSTRACT

The transmission of Salmonella enterica within a vertically integrated poultry operation was investigated longitudinally over an 18-month period (2013-2014). Thirty six percent of all samples collected (1503 of 4219) were positive for salmonellae with seven Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars, and one Salmonella enterica subsp. salamae serovar detected. Both Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars Infantis and Typhimurium were detected in all locations sampled. Salmonella Typhimurium was the most frequently detected serovar (63% of serotyped samples) with 8 phage types (PT) and 41 multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis (MLVA) profiles identified. The most frequently identified phage types were PT135a and DT135. A total of 62 PT/MLVA combinations were observed. MLVA profiles 03-14-10-09-525 and 03-15-11-11-525 were the most frequently identified and 83% of the isolates shared at least one MLVA profile with an isolate from another phage type. The use of phage typing and MLVA profiling, on their own or in combination, were insufficient to understand the complexity of the epidemiological relationships between locations within this production system. Despite the high level of apparent diversity, cluster analysis was unable to differentiate the transmission pathways of all S. Typhimurium variants detected within the integrated enterprise. Using additional epidemiological information, the parent breeder rearing site was identified as the most likely point of introduction of two S. Typhimurium isolates into the production system with subsequent dissemination to the broiler flocks via the hatchery. This complexity is unable to be resolved in the absence of intensive sampling programs at all generations of the production system.


Subject(s)
Bacteriophage Typing/methods , Molecular Typing/methods , Phenotype , Poultry/microbiology , Salmonella Infections/transmission , Salmonella/classification , Serotyping/methods , Animals , Chickens , Genotype , Minisatellite Repeats , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Salmonella Infections/microbiology
4.
Food Microbiol ; 71: 73-81, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29366472

ABSTRACT

To better understand factors influencing infectious agent dispersal within a livestock population information is needed on the nature and frequency of contacts between farm enterprises. This study uses social network analysis to describe the contact network within a vertically integrated broiler poultry enterprise to identify the potential horizontal and vertical transmission pathways for Salmonella spp. Nodes (farms, sheds, production facilities) were identified and the daily movement of commodities (eggs, birds, feed, litter) and people between nodes were extracted from routinely kept farm records. Three time periods were examined in detail, 1- and 8- and 17-weeks of the production cycle and contact networks were described for all movements, and by commodity and production type. All nodes were linked by at least one movement during the study period but network density was low indicating that all potential pathways between nodes did not exist. Salmonella spp. transmission via vertical or horizontal pathways can only occur along directed pathways when those pathways are present. Only two locations (breeder or feed nodes) were identified where the transmission of a single Salmonella spp. clone could theoretically percolate through the network to the broiler or processing nodes. Only the feed transmission pathway directly connected all parts of the network.


Subject(s)
Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/veterinary , Poultry Diseases/transmission , Salmonella Infections, Animal/transmission , Salmonella/physiology , Animal Feed/analysis , Animal Feed/microbiology , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Chickens , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Social Support
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...