ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A subset of military veterans who have experienced both traumatic brain injury and psychological trauma present with chronic neuropsychiatric symptoms and experience persistent obstacles to social reintegration. This project aimed to develop a novel treatment targeting the unmet social rehabilitation needs of these veterans. Initial intervention development, feasibility, and outcome data are explored. METHOD: Four treatment groups were conducted (n = 20). A treatment workbook was developed during Groups 1 and 2 (n = 10) and research data were collected from Groups 3 and 4 (n = 10). RESULTS: There was a 0% attrition rate across all groups with unanimous requests for additional sessions. T test effect sizes were analyzed with bias-corrected Hedges' g. Improvements were observed on measures of depression (p = .026, g = 0.73), empathic perspective taking (p = .007, g = 0.94), social cognition (p = .002-.678, g = 0.27-1.30 across multiple measures), social relationships (p = .007, g = 1.50), traumatic brain injury-related quality of life (social: p = .014, g = 0.68, emotional: p = .009, g = 1.28) and nonsocial executive functioning (p = .006, g = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Preliminary evidence from this exploratory study suggests that targeting multiple layers of social competence using a combined psychotherapy and cognitive rehabilitation approach holds promise. Larger, controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of this intervention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/rehabilitation , Psychiatric Rehabilitation/methods , Psychological Trauma/rehabilitation , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Social Participation , Social Perception , Social Skills , Veterans , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , United States , Veterans/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anger have been implicated separately in relationship dysfunction for veterans; however, no studies have simultaneously examined the roles of each of these constructs. METHOD: This study examined the roles of PTSD and anger in the relationships of Vietnam veterans and their partners (n = 33 couples) with actor-partner interdependence modeling (APIM). Couples in which the veteran was diagnosed with PTSD (PTSD-positive; n = 20) were compared to couples in which the veteran did not have PTSD (PTSD-negative; n = 13) on measures of frequency of anger and relationship functioning. RESULTS: PTSD-positive and PTSD-negative couples reported similar levels of relationship functioning, yet PTSD-positive veterans reported experiencing anger significantly more often than PTSD-negative veterans. Across groups, anger was predictive of relationship functioning, but PTSD severity was not. CONCLUSIONS: Trait anger may have a more deleterious effect on relationship functioning than PTSD symptoms. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.
