Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 163(3): 1005-1011, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37697807

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine and predict the maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies occurring in patients with cardiac disease. METHOD: This retrospective review included 147 pregnancies identified from antenatal, delivery, and nursery records. Information concerning the nature and severity of the pre-existing cardiac disease, comorbidities, risk scores, obstetric or cardiac complications, and pregnancy outcomes were collected. The data were analyzed using SPSS Windows version 22. RESULTS: In all, 111 (73.5%) of the cohort had acquired heart disease and 4 (2.7%) of patients belonged to WHO class IV, in which pregnancy is not recommended. Additionally, 12 (8.1%) were categorized as being at significant risk of having a cardiac complication. The proportion of patients that had maternal and perinatal mortality was 6 (4.0%) and 7 (4.8%), respectively. The WHO and CARPREG scoring systems were reliably able to predict cardiac events (P < 0.01). Mothers who received preconception counseling had significantly fewer occurrences of cardiac and obstetric events than those who did not. CONCLUSION: Cardiac disease in pregnancy in women managed at our center was most often an acquired disease. The baseline risk assessment scores accurately predicted the likelihood of adverse cardiac outcomes.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular , Infant, Newborn , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/complications , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/epidemiology
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 42(8): 3560-3567, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36541410

ABSTRACT

This retrospective observational study compared pregnancy outcomes based on mode of delivery in women with homozygous sickle cell disease (HbSS) to women without (HbAA) using delivery records of 48,600 parturients between January 1992 and January 2020. Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney's test were used to analyse variables based on sickle cell status. Vaginal delivery and HbSS were more associated with labour induction/augmentation (AOR = 2.4, (0.7-7.8)), intrapartum complications (AOR = 2.6, (0.5-14)), postpartum haemorrhage (AOR = 2.8 (0.5-15.2)) and postpartum infections (AOR = 9.6 (1.7-54.4)). Caesarean delivery resulted in more postpartum infections in the HbSS group (AOR = 23.6 (0.9-638.4)). Vaginal delivery in HbSS resulted in more intrapartum complications and postpartum haemorrhage but caesarean delivery greatly increased the risk of postpartum infections and hypertensive disorders. Sickle cell disease (SCD) did not confer increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes regardless of mode of delivery.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Women with homozygous sickle cell disease (SCD) are at an increased risk of postpartum infections, undergoing caesarean delivery, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and overall perinatal mortality when compared to women with normal haemoglobin genotype. Comparisons have been made between homozygous SS disease and haemoglobin SC disease revealing higher rates of maternal and foetal morbidity in both groups.What do the results of this study add? Studies comparing maternal and foetal morbidity based on mode of delivery are lacking. To our knowledge, this study is the first examine maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with SCD undergoing vaginal and abdominal delivery compared to women with normal haemoglobin. We found that vaginal delivery in SCD is associated with more postpartum haemorrhage and caesarean delivery was linked to more hypertensive disorders and postpartum infections then compared to women with normal haemoglobin. Converse to other reports, there was no difference in perinatal outcomes based on mode of delivery.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Caesarean delivery and SCD greatly increased the risk of postpartum infections and hypertensive disorders but did not confer a higher risk of postpartum haemorrhage. There were more maternal deaths in SCD women who underwent caesarean vs. vaginal delivery and this requires further study to determine the pregestational predictors of adverse outcomes. Women with SCD who achieve a successful primary vaginal delivery may have reduced risk of complications in subsequent pregnancies, possibly comparable to women without the disease.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Postpartum Hemorrhage , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Hemoglobins , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy Outcome , Maternal Mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...