CD4 cell response to 3 doses of subcutaneous interleukin 2: meta-analysis of 3 Vanguard studies.

BACKGROUND: In advance of a large clinical end point trial evaluating the effectiveness of subcutaneous interleukin 2 (scIL-2) for treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, 3 identically designed Vanguard trials were conducted in Buenos Aires, Argentina; Bangkok, Thailand; and Houston, Texas. To more precisely quantitate the effect on CD4 cell response of 3 different doses of scIL-2 that were administered twice daily for 5 days every 8 weeks, the results of these 3 trials were pooled in a meta-analysis. METHODS: Two hundred eighteen HIV-1-infected subjects who were receiving antiretroviral therapy and who had a baseline CD4 cell count of > or =350 cells/mm3 were consecutively randomized to receive scIL-2 at a dose of 1.5 mIU (n=36) or a control regimen (n=36); or scIL-2 at a dose of 4.5 mIU (n=36) or a control regimen (n=36); or scIL-2 at a dose of 7.5 mIU (n=37) or a control regimen (n=37). After completion of 3 cycles of therapy, the subjects were enrolled in an extension phase (months 6-12). Subjects were encouraged to receive additional cycles of scIL-2 to maintain a CD4 cell count of more than twice the baseline count or >1000 cells/mm3. RESULTS: After completion of 3 cycles of scIL-2, the mean CD4 cell count changes from baseline (calculated as changes from baseline in a scIL-2 group minus changes from baseline in its contemporaneous control group) were 67 (P=.14), 339 (P<.0001), and 605 cells/mm3 (P<.0001) for the 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 mIU dose groups, respectively (P<.0001 for differences among dose groups). Between months 6 and 12, a total of 78%, 39%, and 32% of subjects assigned to the 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 mIU dose groups, respectively, needed at least 1 additional cycle to achieve the CD4 cell count goal. At 12 months, the differences in the mean change in CD4 cell count from baseline between each scIL-2 dose group and its contemporaneous control group were 184, 369, and 432 cells/mm3, respectively (P=.01 for differences among dose groups). CONCLUSIONS: Although CD4 cell count increases were seen in all 3 dose groups, higher scIL-2 doses resulted in greater CD4 cell count changes after 6 months, compared with control groups.

Increasing CD4+ T cells specific for tuberculosis correlate with improved clinical immunity after highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Treatment advances have led to dramatic clinical improvements for patients with HIV-1 infection. These clinical improvements reflect treatment-related improvements in immune function, which are most striking in individuals who develop exaggerated immune inflammatory responses to occult opportunistic infections. The mechanisms accounting for these exaggerated immune responses are unknown. To gain insight into these mechanisms, we intensively studied a subject untreated for disseminated tuberculosis and HIV-1 coinfection who then began treatment for both diseases. We examined the changing frequencies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-specific CD4(+) T cells that produced interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) after short-term stimulation with MTB antigen, and we compared these frequencies with those in HIV-1-seronegative subjects with and without prior exposure to MTB antigens. For the HIV-1/MTB-coinfected subject, the proportion of peripheral blood CD4(+) T cells expressing MTB-specific IFN-gamma was 8.6% at 11 days, 11% at 33 days, and 33% at 95 days after starting treatment for HIV-1. CD4(+) IFN-gamma(+) T cells had a CD45RA(-)CD62L(-) (effector memory) phenotype and most coexpressed interleukin 2. Median frequencies of CD4(+) IFN-gamma(+) T cells from six subjects without and nine subjects with prior exposure to MTB antigens were 0.06 and 0.46%, respectively. We conclude that individuals starting treatment for disseminated tuberculosis and HIV-1 coinfection can accumulate remarkably large numbers of MTB-specific CD4(+) T cells in the peripheral blood. The rapid expansion of antigen-specific effector CD4(+) T cells is one mechanism to explain immediate improvements in clinical immunity after HIV-1 treatment. This mechanism provides a theoretical framework to understand the unusual inflammatory responses recently reported to occur after starting HIV-1 treatment.