Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Review and Considerations for Older Populations.

Though more common earlier in life, increasing attention is being focused on the development of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in patients with advancing age. Studies show that CLE is more common in older populations than previously thought, and all CLE subtypes are possible in this group. Just like patients in the third or fourth decade of life, CLE may appear alongside or independent of systemic lupus erythematosus. Older populations manifesting CLE for the first time seem to have a lower risk of progression to systemic disease than younger peers, and are more commonly White. CLE must be carefully distinguished from other skin conditions that have a predilection for presentation in older populations, including rosacea, lichen planus, and other autoimmune conditions such as dermatomyositis or pemphigus/pemphigoid. It is thought that most CLE in older populations is drug-induced, with drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus being the most common subtype. Management of CLE in older patients focuses on eliminating unnecessary medications known to induce CLE, and otherwise treatment proceeds similarly to that in younger patients, with a few special considerations.

Obesity is an independent risk factor for cancer development following diagnosis of dermatomyositis.

Patients with dermatomyositis (DM) are at an increased risk of cancer development, especially around the time of diagnosis of DM. Obesity is also a risk factor in the general population for cancer development. This study aimed to assess the association between cancer in DM patients with and without obesity as defined by ICD code and BMI data. In this analysis of patients with DM, logistic regression modeling of the odds of cancer outcome was performed for patients with DM and obesity compared to those without obesity, adjusted for age and sex. A total of 12,722 patients with DM were identified, of whom 6,055 had available BMI data. DM patients who were coded obese at any point had significantly higher odds 1.98 (95 % Confidence interval (CI) 1.70, 2.30) of a subsequent cancer diagnosis. This association was also found in the subgroup analysis with available BMI where patients with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) had an increased odds of cancer 1.23 (1.02, 1.49) when compared to patients with BMI <30 kg/m2 with DM. In time to event analysis any obesity code was associated with a 16 % increased hazard of cancer (adjusted hazard ratio 1.16 [95 % CI 1.02, 1.31]). Overall, the most frequent type of cancer was breast cancer, however patients with DM and obesity had higher frequencies of lymphoma, colorectal, melanoma, uterine, renal cancers compared to patients with DM without obesity.

Higher Odds of Adverse Cutaneous Reactions in Patients With Dermatomyositis Treated With Hydroxychloroquine Compared With Methotrexate.

OBJECTIVE: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) use for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM) has been associated with adverse cutaneous reactions. We applied a new user, active comparator, retrospective design to assess differences in adverse cutaneous reactions or hospitalizations between HCQ and methotrexate (MTX) use among patients with DM. METHODS: We used a national network of data from insurance registries (TriNetX), enrolling patients with two International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for DM separated by 6 months or more who had a prescription for either (but not both) HCQ or MTX on or after DM diagnosis. Outcomes were adverse cutaneous reactions (ICD codes) or hospital admission (Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes) within 4 months from the prescription dispense date. Logistic regression was used to produce adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing outcomes in the HCQ group (n = 1364) and the MTX group (n = 1400), adjusted for age at first DM diagnosis, year of birth, sex, and time from DM diagnosis to first prescription. RESULTS: Overall, we found no significant difference in odds of hospitalization in those taking HCQ (aOR 1.05; 95% CI: 0.79-1.39) compared with those on MTX. Patients with DM on HCQ had 30% higher odds of adverse cutaneous reaction diagnosis compared with patients on MTX (aOR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.59). Age at DM diagnosis was an effect modifier of this association, with higher odds of adverse cutaneous reaction among patients taking HCQ who were younger at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Compared with MTX use, HCQ use, especially in younger patients, may result in higher odds of adverse cutaneous reactions.

Biomarkers of Exposure and Potential Harm among Natural American Spirit Smokers.

OBJECTIVES: We compared biomarkers of exposure and potential harm in smokers of American Spirit (AS) to smokers of Marlboro, Newport, Camel, and Pall Mall. METHODS: We conducted secondary analysis on: (1) data from a randomized clinical trial (RCT); and (2) the Population Assessment of Tobacco Use and Health (PATH) Study. Biomarkers analyzed included: total nicotine equivalents (TNE); 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronides (total NNAL); N'-nitrosonornicotine and its N-glucuronide (total NNN);3-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid(3-HPMA); 2-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid (2-HPMA), 3-hydroxy-1 methylpropylmercapturic acid (HMPMA); S-phenylmercapturic acid(SPMA); 2-cyanoethylmercapturic acid (CEMA); phenanthrene tetraol(PheT);1-hydroxypyrene (1-HOP);8-iso-PGF2α; white blood count(WBC); prostaglandin E metabolite(PGEM); and high sensitivity C-reactive protein(hsCRP). RESULTS: AS smokers did not differ in TNE but had higher TNE per cigarette compared to other brands. Total NNAL, total NNN, CEMA, and 3-HPMA were lower in AS smokers. All other biomarkers were no different in AS smokers compared to all or the majority of the other brands. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of total NNAL, total NNN, acrylonitrile, and acrolein were reduced in AS smokers; however, it is not known whether reductions in exposure to these toxicants contribute to reduced harm. Higher TNE per cigarette smoked in AS smokers suggests a greater addictive potential compared to other brands. Regulatory action to ensure that consumers are not misled about the risks of the AS brand are recommended.