Efficacy of ivermectin in a controlled-release capsule for the control of breech strike in sheep.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of ivermectin in an intraruminal controlled-release capsule (CRC) against blowfly strike. DESIGN: Pen and field trials with controls. ANIMALS: Pen studies: Two breech strike trials involving 60 Romney and 60 Merino sheep. One body strike trial using 100 Merino sheep. Field trials: Eight trials in New Zealand used 1000 Romney and Romney-cross sheep. Fifty Merino lambs in one trial in Australia. PROCEDURE: Pen studies: Sheep were allocated to two equal groups. One was not treated, the other sheep received a CRC that delivered ivermectin at > or = 20 micrograms/kg/day for 100 days. In the breech strike trials, each animal was given an oral laxative 2 days before exposure to adult Lucilia cuprina. In the body-strike trial, the sheep sheep were kept wet to increase susceptibility prior to the release of blowflies. Field trials: Fifty or 200 sheep allocated to equal groups of nontreated or treated with the CRC and grazed at pasture exposed to natural blowfly challenge. RESULTS: Pen studies: Breech strikes developed in 24 of 60 controls but in none of 60 CRC-treated sheep. There was a 35% reduction in the number of CRC-treated sheep struck on the body. Field trials: The average number of breech strikes in CRC-treated sheep was reduced by 86% (P < 0.001). The number of body strikes in the treated groups was a reduced by 27% (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The ivermectin CRC is a useful aid in controlling breech strike, but provides only moderate reduction in the incidence of body strike.

Field trials evaluating ivermectin controlled-release capsules for weaner sheep and for breeding ewes.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the efficacy of ivermectin released from a controlled-release capsule administered to young sheep and to breeding ewes under field conditions. DESIGN: Randomised field trials. PROCEDURE: In each of ten field trials 25 weaned lambs were treated with ivermectin controlled-release capsules and 25 remained untreated. Eight similar field trials were conducted using adult ewes. Efficacy against infections of gastrointestinal nematodes was assessed by faecal egg counts and faecal larval culture. Body weights were recorded and faecal soiling of the breech wool (dags) was assessed. RESULTS: Nematode faecal egg counts in the two groups were not different (P = 0.13) before treatment in the weaner trials or before treatment in the ewe trials (P = 0.49), but thereafter eggs in the untreated sheep persisted, whereas counts in sheep given capsules were negligible (P < or = 0.01). In the weaner trials, dag scores for the two groups were not different at the start of the trials (P = 0.18) but at the end, untreated sheep had significantly more dags (P = 0.04) than treated sheep. In the ewe trials, dag scores remained low in both groups. Weaners treated with the capsule gained 1.4 kg (95% CL: 0.7, 3.1) more weight over the 16 week trial period compared to untreated weaners (P = 0.01). Both groups of ewes lost weight as a result of parturition but the mean loss by week 16 was greater for untreated (3.7 kg) (95% CL: -5.1, -2.2) than for treated ewes (1.8 kg) (95% CL: -3.3, -0.4). The mean change in ewe body weight for the two groups was however not significant (P = 0.07). Differentiation of nematode larvae recovered from cultures of faeces from untreated animals indicated that the capsules were effective against the common parasites of sheep. CONCLUSION: The capsule was efficacious against gastrointestinal nematodes judging from faecal egg counts. It has the potential to significantly reduce contamination of pasture with nematode eggs. Treated weaners had less dags for 16 weeks and gained more weight than untreated weaners.

Demonstration of the sustained anthelmintic efficacy of a controlled-release capsule formulation of ivermectin in weaner lambs under field conditions in New Zealand.

Ten field trials were conducted in the North and South Islands of New Zealand to evaluate the anthelmintic efficacy and production responses attributable to treatment of weaner lambs with an intra-ruminal controlled-release capsule formulation of ivermectin. A total of 800 Coopworth, Perendale and Romney lambs weighing on average 20.8-34.8 kg were used. Lambs were either untreated or treated shortly after weaning with an ivermectin controlled-release capsule which delivers ivermectin at 0.8 mg per day for 100 days (minimum dose rate 20 microg/kg/day). Bodyweights, faecal nematode egg counts and dag scores (assessment of faecal soiling in the breech area) were determined before treatment and at about 4,8, 12, 14 and 16 weeks after treatment. Sheep treated with the Ivermectin capsule gained significantly more weight (11.6 kg) over the 16 weeks of the trials compared to untreated sheep (7.3 kg) (p < 0.01). Before treatment, faecal strongylid and Nematodirus spp. egg counts were equivalent (p > 0.10) but, at each time point thereafter, egg counts in ivermectin capsule-treated sheep were significantly lower (p < 0.01 or p < 0.05). Dag scores were not different at the start of the trial (p > 0.10), but at the end of the trial control sheep had significantly greater dags (p < 0.05) than sheep treated with the ivermectin capsule. These findings indicate that treated animals contributed significantly fewer nematode eggs to the contamination of pasture and therefore pasture contamination should be significantly reduced for at least 112 days. The productivity of the ivermectin capsule-treated sheep over the I6 weeks of the trials was also significantly increased compared to salvage-treated controls. Furthermore, the presence of dags, which predispose sheep to blowfly strike in the breech area and result in production losses due to the costs of dagging and downgrading of breech wool, were also significantly (p < 0.05) reduced in the ivermectin capsule-treated sheep.

Demonstration of the sustained anthelmintic activity of a controlled-release capsule formulation of ivermectin in ewes under field conditions in New Zealand.

Ten field trials were conducted in the North and South Islands of New Zealand to evaluate the anthelmintic efficacy of an intraruminal controlled-release capsule formulation of ivermectin. A total of 810 Coopworth, Perendale, Romney or Coopworth ' Romney ewes, weighing on average 42-70 kg, were used. Ewes were either untreated or treated shortly before lambing in late winter-early spring (eight trials) or in late spring (two trials) with an ivermectin controlled-release capsule which delivers ivermectin at 1.6 mg per day for 100 days (minimum dose rate 20microg/kg/day). Bodyweights, faecal nematode egg counts and dag scores were determined before treatment and at about 2 and/or 4, 6 or 8, 10 or 12, 14 and 16 weeks after treatment. Ewes treated with the ivermectin controlled-release capsule gained on average 1.1kg more than untreated sheep over the 16 weeks of the trials, but this difference was not significant (p > 0.10). Before treatment, faecal strongylid egg counts were equivalent (p > 0.10), but at each time point thereafter, egg counts in ivermectin controlled-release capsule treated sheep were significantly lower (p < 0.01; p < 0.05 at Week 2). Dag scores were not different at the start of the trial (p > 0.10), but at the end of the trial ivermectin controlled-release capsule treated ewes had significantly lower scores (p < 0.01) than untreated ewes. These findings indicated that treated animals shed significantly fewer nematode eggs and therefore pasture contamination with nematode eggs should be significantly reduced for at least 112 days. The control of dags should result in reduced direct losses due to the decreased value of dag wool, and indirect losses due to the cost of dagging sheep and the cost associated with the treatment and control of flystrike initiated by dags in the breech area.

Effect of simulated rain, coat length and exposure to natural climatic conditions on the efficacy of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against endoparasites of cattle.

A series of five controlled studies involving 114 cattle were conducted in Australia, North America and the United Kingdom to examine the effect of simulated rain, coat length and exposure to natural climatic conditions, on the efficacy of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against nematode parasites of cattle. In all trials infections were induced with a range of bovine nematode species and treatment was applied when the majority of nematodes were mature. In one study, simulated rain was applied to cattle ending one hour before treatment or beginning one, three or six hours after treatment. In a second study cattle had short (1 cm) or long (3-6 cm) haircoats at the time of treatment. Three other studies were conducted using cattle housed indoors or exposed to various natural climatic conditions. Nematode counts were determined using standard techniques and the efficacy of treatment was assessed relative to vehicle-treated controls. Regardless of the timing of simulated rain relative to treatment, eprinomectin was at least 99.9% effective (P < 0.01) against Haemonchus placei, Ostertagia ostertagi. Trichostrongylus axei and Cooperia spp. There were also no differences (p > 0.10) in efficacy between treatment administered to dry or wet cattle, or treatment administered before or after simulated rainfall. Efficacies against O. ostertagi, T. axei, Cooperia ancophora and Dictyocaulus viviparus were > 99.5% (p < 0.01) regardless of the length of the haircoat at the application site. Exposure of treated cattle to sunshine and precipitation had no effect on anthelmintic efficacy (p > 0.10) with efficacies of greater than 99.5% being maintained against H. placei, O. ostertagi (adult and fourth-stage larvae), T. axei, Cooperia spp., Nematodirus helvetianus (adult and inhibited fourth-stage larvae) and Oesophagostomum radiatum. These findings indicate that eprinomectin (500 micrograms/kg) in a topical formulation is a safe and highly effective nematocide for cattle regardless of their coat length and this high level of efficacy is maintained in cattle exposed to a wide variety of climatic conditions.

Control of gastro-intestinal parasitism in sheep with ivermectin delivered via an intraruminal controlled-release capsule.

The efficacy of ivermectin delivered by an intraruminal controlled-release capsule against gastro-intestinal nematodes of sheep was evaluated under controlled conditions. In seven Australian studies involving 170 Merino or Merino x Border Leicester sheep, intraruminal capsules developed for 20-40 kg or 40-80 kg sheep, and delivering 0.8 or 1.6 mg of ivermectin/day respectively for 100 days (minimum dose 20 microg/kg/day), were evaluated. Studies were designed to test the therapeutic efficacy against naturally acquired and induced infections treated at the adult and fourth larval stage, and the prophylactic efficacy against naturally acquired and induced infections with third stage infective larvae. The predominant pathogenic nematodes of sheep were represented. Two studies included known benzimidazole- and levamisole-resistant nematode strains. Sheep were necropsied for total nematode counts 21-8.5 days after treatment. The efficacy of the ivermectin controlled-release capsule was generally >99% against all nematode species tested, including those confirmed to be benzimidazole- and levamisole-resistant. High therapeutic activity was demonstrated against existing adult and fourth larval stage nematode infections at the time of treatment, and high prophylactic efficacy was shown against incoming third stage larvae of all species and strains tested.

Field trials in New Zealand confirming the efficacy of eprinomectin applied topically to cattle.

The efficacy and acceptability of eprinomectin in a topical formulation against gastro-intestinal nematodes in cattle was assessed under field conditions. Seven similar commercial dairy farms in the North and South Islands of New Zealand were included in the studies, involving 247 Holstein-Friesian, Jersey or Jersey-cross cattle. Cattle were confirmed by positive faecal nematode egg counts to have natural infections of gastro-intestinal nematodes and were held in separate treatment groups. In each replicate, four animals received eprinomectin (500 microg/kg body weight) and one animal received vehicle solution, all applied topically at 1 ml/10 kg body weight. Faecal samples were collected before, and 14 days after treatment, for faecal trongylid egg counts. Animals treated with eprinomectin had significantly lower (p < 0.05) Day 14 faecal strongylid egg counts than the controls. There were no significant differences (p > 0.10) between treated and control groups for pretreatment strongylid egg counts. No formulation runoff or adverse reactions were observed. These studies showed eprinomectin to be effective against gastro-intestinal nematode infections and safe for use in dairy cattle under natural field conditions.

Efficacy of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against endoparasites of cattle in New Zealand.

Two controlled studies involving 24 cattle were conducted in New Zealand to determine the efficacy of a topical, non-flammable formulation of eprinomectin against induced and naturally acquired nematode infections. In Trial 1, nematode infections were induced on Day -5 with third-stage larvae of Cooperia spp., Haemonchus contortus, Ostertagia ostertagi and Trichostrongvlus colubriformis so that the nematodes would be at the fourth larval stage when the cattle were treated. In Trial 2, cattle had naturally acquired nematode infections as determined by faecal nematode egg counts and larval cultures. The cattle were allocated on Day 0 (Trial 1) or Day 6 (Trial 2) on a stratified random basis according to bodyweight to one of two treatments: untreated control or eprinomectin (0.5% w/v) applied topically at 1 ml/10 kg bodyweight. Necropsies were undertaken on Days 14 and 15 and total nematode counts were done. In Trial 1, cattle treated with eprinomectin had significantly (p < 0.05) fewer Cooperia spp. and O. ostertagi than the controls. Larvae of H. contortus and T. colubriformis did not establish. In Trial 2, cattle treated with eprinomectin had significantly (p < 0.05) fewer of the following parasites than the controls: Haemonchus spp. (adult), Cooperia surnabada (adult), C. oncophora (adult), Cooperia spp. (L,), Ostertagia lyrata (adult), O. ostertagi (adult), Oesophagostomum spp. (adult), T. avei (adult and L1) and Trichuris spp. (adult). Reductions of 100% were observed for Capilfaria spp. (adult), D. viviparus (adult and L,), and Nematodirus helvetianus (adult), but these were not statistically significant (p > 0.05) because four or fewer control animals were infected with these parasites. In Trial 2, efficacies of greater than 99% were observed against all species for which moderate to high burdens occurred in the untreated controls. These findings indicate that eprinomectin in a topical formulation is a highly effective nematocide in cattle.

An ivermectin tablet for sheep: efficacy against gastro-intestinal nematodes and a bioavailability comparison with a liquid ivermectin formulation.

An ivermectin tablet for oral administration to sheep was developed for use in countries where it is customary to treat sheep with anthelmintic tablets. Tablets require no special administration equipment, and offer convenience for storage and transport. The ivermectin tablet, which delivers 10 mg of ivermectin (200 micrograms kg-1 in a 50 kg sheep), had similar bioavailability to a liquid formulation of ivermectin (IVOMEC Liquid for Sheep) as determined by peak plasma ivermectin concentrations and area under the concentration curve in plasma (P > 0.10). In dose confirmation trials in which nematode infections were induced in helminth-naive sheep, animals treated with the ivermectin tablet had significantly fewer adult and fourth-stage larval nematodes than untreated control sheep (P < 0.01) with efficacies > 99% against all nematode species tested. In six field trials evaluating the efficacy of the ivermectin tablet in 240 Merino sheep, the reductions in faecal nematode egg counts ranged between 98 and 100%, as determined by comparison of pre- and post-treatment counts for the ivermectin-treated group.

Efficacy and safety of ivermectin applied topically to cattle under field conditions in Australia.

Fifteen controlled field trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy against gastrointestinal nematodes and safety of ivermectin when applied topically to cattle in Australia. Three hundred and fifty-one cattle received ivermectin, and 88 were untreated controls. The trials were conducted in 3 States and included a variety of cattle breeds and environmental conditions. Faecal samples were collected before treatment and 11 to 14 days after treatment for nematode egg counts. Data from these trials show that under Australian conditions, ivermectin applied along the mid line of the back from the withers to the sacral region at a dose rate of 500 mcg/kg body weight, effectively controlled gastrointestinal nematode infections, and did not produce unacceptable adverse reactions in the animals.

Changes in anthelmintic resistance status of Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis exposed to different anthelmintic selection pressures in grazing sheep.

This experiment was designed to study, over a 5-year-period, the effect of different frequencies of treatment with three different anthelmintic groups, namely, benzimidazoles, levamisole and ivermectin, and different frequencies of alternation between them, on existing levels of anthelmintic resistance in the nematode parasites Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis of grazing sheep. No evidence of ivermectin resistance emerged, even in suppressively treated groups. Likewise, H. contortus failed to develop resistance to levamisole under a similar selection regimen. Thiabendazole was shown to select positively against levamisole resistance in T. colubriformis resulting in significantly greater susceptibility to this drug than for the natural reversion which occurred in the untreated control. There was no evidence that an anthelmintic treatment combined with a movement of sheep to pastures of low infectivity selected more rapidly for resistance than where the same number of treatments were given to set-stocked sheep. Rotation between anthelmintic groups at yearly intervals appeared to be more beneficial in delaying resistance than rotation of drugs with each treatment.