Prescribing patterns for paediatric hyperopia among paediatric eye care providers.

PURPOSE: To survey paediatric eye care providers to identify current patterns of prescribing for hyperopia. METHODS: Paediatric eye care providers were invited, via email, to participate in a survey to evaluate current age-based refractive error prescribing practices. Questions were designed to determine which factors may influence the survey participant's prescribing pattern (e.g., patient's age, magnitude of hyperopia, patient's symptoms, heterophoria and stereopsis) and if the providers were to prescribe, how much hyperopic correction would they prescribe (e.g., full or partial prescription). The response distributions by profession (optometry and ophthalmology) were compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov cumulative distribution function test. RESULTS: Responses were submitted by 738 participants regarding how they prescribe for their hyperopic patients. Most providers within each profession considered similar clinical factors when prescribing. The percentages of optometrists and ophthalmologists who reported considering the factor often differed significantly. Factors considered similarly by both optometrists and ophthalmologists were the presence of symptoms (98.0%, p = 0.14), presence of astigmatism and/or anisometropia (97.5%, p = 0.06) and the possibility of teasing (8.3%, p = 0.49). A wide range of prescribing was observed within each profession, with some providers reporting that they would prescribe for low levels of hyperopia while others reported that they would never prescribe. When prescribing for bilateral hyperopia in children with age-normal visual acuity and no manifest deviation or symptoms, the threshold for prescribing decreased with age for both professions, with ophthalmologists typically prescribing 1.5-2 D less than optometrists. The threshold for prescribing also decreased for both optometrists and ophthalmologists when children had associated clinical factors (e.g., esophoria or reduced near visual function). Optometrists and ophthalmologists most commonly prescribed based on cycloplegic refraction, although optometrists most commonly prescribed based on both the manifest and cycloplegic refraction for children ≥7 years. CONCLUSION: Prescribing patterns for paediatric hyperopia vary significantly among eye care providers.

Proportion of refractive errors in a Polish immigrant population in Chicago.

PURPOSE: This retrospective record review was conducted to investigate the proportion of patients with refractive error in a Polish immigrant population residing in an urban environment. Illinois has more than 1 million people of Polish descent as citizens, and Chicago is considered to have the second largest population of Polish descent in the world, outside of Warsaw, Poland. METHODS: Six hundred seventy-five records (271 men/404 women) of Polish immigrants were reviewed from a practice with >92% Polish immigrants in the patient base. The patients ranged in age from 3 to 94 years. Refractive status for each eye, and the existence of any strabismus or amblyopia, was recorded. RESULTS: The proportion of myopia [spherical equivalent at least -0.75 diopter (D)] was found to be 35.1%, whereas the proportion of hyperopia (spherical equivalent > or =+0.75 D) was found to be 38.4%. Fifteen percent of the patients exhibited astigmatism > or =1.00 D. Amblyopia was present in 9% of the patients, whereas the prevalence of strabismus was found to be 3%, with 76% of the strabismics exhibiting esotropia. In the 0- to 18-year age range and the 19- to 45-year age range, the most common refractive error was low myopia (43.9 and 36.9%), whereas in the patients >45 years of age, it was low hyperopia (31.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Refractive error data are presented for a population base that has not been previously reported, although Polish Americans comprise 3% of the US population. Myopia is more common in young Polish patients than in the general US population. The strong hyperopic shift in older patients may either be normal aging or the product of increased near work in the young. The high rates of amblyopia call for more aggressive education and treatment.

Diagnosing and managing functional visual complications after brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Brain injury caused by an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) hemorrhage is an uncommon occurrence in a teenager. An AVM is a congenital anomaly of unknown etiology, often described as a tangle of arteries and veins that may vary in length and width leading to a loss of capillary bed. The vessels can break down with time and cause hemorrhage or aneurysm. Hemorrhage occurs in a significant number of patients with AVM. Intracranial hemorrhage causes brain injury, which can lead to systemic and ocular complications, neurologic deficits, and death. CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old girl presented to our clinic with a chief complaint of horizontal diplopia while reading, lasting from seconds to 5 minutes. Nine months before the examination she had a ruptured cerebral AVM, then surgery to control the bleeding. She spent 6 weeks in a coma after surgery and woke up a hemiplegic. There were no visual problems before the bleeding. Our evaluation showed accommodative insufficiency, oculomotor dysfunction, dry eye syndrome, and a right beating latent nystagmus in both eyes. Perceptual testing showed a severe visual sequential memory deficit. The patient was given a reading prescription to aid with accommodation and was to use artificial tears and lacrilube ointment. At the follow-up examination, she reported increased efficiency and fewer episodes of diplopia while reading with bifocals and fewer dry eye symptoms since using the artificial tears. CONCLUSIONS: After a brain injury, a young adult can present with perceptual and visual efficiency problems as well as nystagmus. It is important to test all areas that may be affected by this type of event and to investigate all complaints thoroughly with continued follow-up care. A latent nystagmus was discovered during thorough near point testing. The visual perceptual testing helped to confirm the visual sequential memory deficit, which may otherwise have been overlooked. It is believed that the diplopic complaint and poor oculomotor skills were directly related to the newly acquired nystagmus.

An optometric approach to patients with sensory integration dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Sensory integration dysfunction is a neurologic condition that can cause children to process environmental sensations in an inappropriate way. As a result, they may either seek out strong sensations or avoid even mild sensations. Some of the characteristics of these children may be hyperactivity, poor awareness of pain, high risk taking, listening to loud sounds, clumsiness, poor fine motor skills, poor gross motor skills, poor visual tracking, problems with sequencing, and problems with balance. Sensory integration dysfunction often is related to children with developmental disabilities, autism, and attention deficits. METHODS: Two children from the same family were examined for general eye examinations because of a history of sensory integration problems. J.H., an 11-year-old girl, and her 6-year-old half-brother, A.T., returned to the clinic for visual-perceptual testing: the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA), the Developmental Eye Movement Test (DEM), and the Visagraph (Compevo AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The use of yoked prisms with these children was also explored. RESULTS: Both children showed oculomotility problems based on the DEM and Visagraph results. Whereas J.H. performed well on the visual-perceptual profile overall, A.T. showed problems in many areas such as reversals, visual spatial relations, visual sequential memory, visual form constancy, and attention. Both children were low hyperopes and showed positive postural and balance changes when tested with yoked prisms. CONCLUSIONS: Children with sensory integration dysfunction can have a number of signs and symptoms that may bring them to the optometrist's office. It is important to thoroughly test their visual, perceptual, and oculomotor systems to determine the best way to help these patients. The use of vision therapy and yoked prisms can be beneficial treatment options for many of these patients.

Unusual eye movements in a patient with complex partial seizure disorder.

BACKGROUND: A complex partial seizure can cause a variety of visual system signs and symptoms, including visual hallucinations, dilated pupils, and changes in vision. Little information is known about the influence of this disorder on the visual system during nonseizure moments. This case report examines the unusual eye movements-during these nonseizure times-of a patient diagnosed with complex partial seizure disorder. CASE REPORT: An 8-year-old boy was referred to the clinic by his pediatric neurologist for a comprehensive examination to rule out a visual cause for the abnormal eye movements observed by the patient's mother. Ocular examination revealed periodic, spontaneous, versional eye movements to the left and right, accompanied by a small widening of the fissures and turning of the head. No vergence or accommodative problems were detected, but Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) and Visagraph testing showed mild dysfunction. Ocular health was unremarkable, while radiology studies and neurological evaluation yielded no observable pathology. CONCLUSION: Complex partial seizure disorder can affect the visual system in a wide variety of ways. The precise role, if any, that complex partial seizure disorder plays in ocular motility control during nonseizure moments is unknown. The most-plausible etiology of the observed ocular movements in this patient is the presence of a tic disorder. Patients with unknown eye movement disorders deserve a thorough evaluation, including a search for systemic causes.