An objective methodology capturing online commodity marketing and other harms.

Increasingly life is lived online, yet little is known about the actual nature and extent of online content that people view due to the difficulty of recording real time exposure. This includes people's exposure to harmful commodity marketing. This study aimed to develop a methodology to assess the nature and extent of exposure to, and engagement with, unhealthy commodity marketing and other public health harms online, particularly children's exposure. A convenience sample of 16 young adult participants (aged 21-29) recorded their device usage for 2 days using Zoom software. Data were coded and analysed to assess the nature and extent of marketing for alcohol, gambling, junk food and smoking products. Four focus groups were conducted with participants to explore their data collection and coding experiences, and results assessed using thematic analysis. The study found that, with some modifications, this method was feasible for gathering real-time objective data from the online world that can be analysed for a range of public health harms, including marketing of unhealthy commodities. Larger studies are recommended to build global evidence for public health action in the online world.

An Age Stratified Analysis of the Access to Care Continuum Across Three Tumor Groups: Are There Delays for AYA?

Purpose: Delays in diagnosis and treatment are regularly discussed as potential poor prognostic factors for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. We aimed to determine whether AYA cancer patients (15-24 years of age) in the South Island of New Zealand had longer times to diagnosis and treatment than pediatric (<15 years) and adult patients (>24 years) with the same diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was undertaken for 201 recently diagnosed sarcoma, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients in the South Island. An age stratified analysis was undertaken with a number of intervals related to the time to diagnosis (TTD) and total interval (TI) being determined. Results: Overall, the AYA group's TTD and TI was longer than the pediatric group, but shorter than the adult group. No age-based differences in patient interval (PI) were identified. AYA and adult sarcoma patients had longer TTD and TI than pediatric sarcoma. AYA and pediatric NHL patients had a shorter TTD and TI than adult NHL. No significant age-related interval differences were found in the HL group. Conclusions: AYA patients had a longer TTD and TI when compared with the pediatric group, but not when compared with the adult group. The impact of established AYA barriers to presentation are questioned, given no age-based differences in PI were found. The influence of tumor biology and cancer service delivery is an important consideration. Improved applicability of this type of research will be enabled by international collaboration.