Outcome of argon beam and LASER ablation of large rectal adenomas.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic ablation of large rectal adenomas is being increasingly used as primary treatment. Despite the avoidance of general anaesthesia and the prevention of more major procedures, patients undergoing endoscopic ablation have the disadvantage of multiple treatment sessions and the lack of adequate tissue sample for complete histological study. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of all patients with large rectal polyps treated with endoscopic ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1993 and 1998, 29 patients who underwent endoscopic ablation of large rectal adenoma were identified. All their case notes were analysed and information was collected on recurrence, treatment episodes, complications, the incidence of carcinoma and the necessity for further procedures. RESULTS: At a median 40 (range 4-67) months follow-up, 41% of patients had recurrence of their adenoma and 14% had been diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. Only 24% of patients had been discharged while 21% were clear but were still under surveillance. Seven (24%) patients had complications, 6 stenosis and one severe bleeding. All stenosis occurred in patients who had more than 10 treatment sessions. In all, 31% of patients needed further endoanal or abdominal surgery and the median time to making this decision was 28 (range 4-66) months. There were no deaths. CONCLUSION: Laser and argon ablation of large rectal adenomas has proved very disappointing. It should be reserved for patients who are unfit to undergo general anaesthesia.

Per anal excision of large rectal adenomas using an endoscopic stapler.

Large rectal adenomas can be approached per-anally by open excision or by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS). We describe the adaptation of an endoscopic linear stapler-cutter for per anal excision of rectal polyps. It can be used for difficult polyps with minimal risk of complications and is easier and more accessible than TEMS.

The anatomy of the extrathoracic intercostobrachial nerve.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade surgeons have become increasingly aware of the morbidity caused by the division of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) during axillary dissection. To prevent this problem and also to explain its variable occurrence, a detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the nerve is required. METHODS: Twenty-eight axillary dissections were performed demonstrating the anatomy of the ICBN. RESULTS: In all dissections the nerve originated from the second intercostal space, with contributions from the first and third intercostal nerve each on one occasion. The posterior axillary branch was constant but may branch early, simulating a second nerve. The ICBN had a variable relationship to the lateral thoracic vein: anterior, posterior or wrapping around it. In 36% there was a connection to the medial cord of the brachial plexus in the axilla. In the upper arm the nerve lies in the subcutaneous fat; in the majority it supplied at least the proximal half of the arm, and in one-third it reached the level of the elbow joint. In 18% there was a connection to the medial cutaneous nerve of the arm. CONCLUSION: The ICBN and its main branch (the posterior axillary nerve) were constant in all dissections. But its origin, size, connection to the brachial plexus and medial cutaneous nerve of the arm were variable, as was its ultimate destination in the arm.