Use of whole genome sequencing to identify low-frequency mutations in COVID-19 patients treated with remdesivir

BackgroundWe investigate the effects of remdesivir (RDV) treatment on intra-host SARS-CoV-2 diversity and low-frequency mutations in moderately ill hospitalized COVID-19 patients and compare them to patients without RDV treatment. MethodsSequential collections of nasopharyngeal and mid-turbinate swabs were obtained from 16 patients with and 31 patients without RDV treatment. A total of 113 samples were sequenced and mutation analyses were performed. ResultsWe did not identify any drug resistant mutations during RDV therapy. In genes encoding and associated with the replication complex, low-frequency minority variants that do not reach fixation within the sampling period were detected in 6/16 (37.5%) and 14/31 (45%) patients with and without RDV treatment respectively. We did not detect significant differences in within-host diversity and positive selection between the RDV-treated and untreated groups. ConclusionsMinimal intra-host variability and stochastic low-frequency variants detected in moderately ill patients suggests little selective pressure in patients receiving short courses of RDV. Patients undergoing short regimens of RDV therapy should continue to be monitored.

Immunogenicity of convalescent and vaccinated sera against clinical isolates of ancestral SARS-CoV-2, beta, delta, and omicron variants

The omicron variant of concern (VOC) of SARS-CoV-2 was first reported in November 2021 in Botswana and South Africa. Omicron has evolved multiple mutations within the spike protein and the receptor binding domain (RBD), raising concerns of increased antibody evasion. Here, we isolated infectious omicron from a clinical specimen obtained in Canada. The neutralizing activity of sera from 65 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine recipients and convalescent individuals against clinical isolates of ancestral SARS-CoV-2, beta, delta, and omicron VOCs was assessed. Convalescent sera from unvaccinated individuals infected by the ancestral virus during the first wave of COVID-19 in Canada (July, 2020) demonstrated reduced neutralization against beta and omicron VOCs. Convalescent sera from unvaccinated individuals infected by the delta variant (May-June, 2021) neutralized omicron to significantly lower levels compared to the delta variant. Sera from individuals that received three doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines demonstrated reduced neutralization of the omicron variant relative to ancestral SARS-CoV-2. Sera from individuals that were naturally infected with ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and subsequently received two doses of the Pfizer vaccine induced significantly higher neutralizing antibody levels against ancestral virus and all VOCs. Importantly, infection alone, either with ancestral SARS-CoV-2 or the delta variant was not sufficient to induce high neutralizing antibody titers against omicron. This data will inform current booster vaccination strategies, and we highlight the need for additional studies to identify longevity of immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and optimal neutralizing antibody levels that are necessary to prevent infection and/or severe COVID-19.

A "Made-in-Canada" serology solution for profiling humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination

OBJECTIVESAntibody testing against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been instrumental in detecting previous exposures and analyzing vaccine-elicited immune responses. Here, we describe a scalable solution to detect and quantify SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, discriminate between natural infection- and vaccination-induced responses, and assess antibody-mediated inhibition of the spike-angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) interaction. METHODSWe developed methods and reagents to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The main assays focus on the parallel detection of immunoglobulin (Ig)Gs against the spike trimer, its receptor binding domain (RBD), and nucleocapsid (N). We automated a surrogate neutralization (sn)ELISA that measures inhibition of ACE2-spike or -RBD interactions by antibodies. The assays were calibrated to a World Health Organization reference standard. RESULTSOur single-point IgG-based ELISAs accurately distinguished non-infected and infected individuals. For seroprevalence assessment (in a non-vaccinated cohort), classifying a sample as positive if antibodies were detected for [≥] 2 of the 3 antigens provided the highest specificity. In vaccinated cohorts, increases in anti-spike and -RBD (but not -N) antibodies are observed. We present detailed protocols for serum/plasma or dried blood spots analysis performed manually and on automated platforms. The snELISA can be performed automatically at single points, increasing its scalability. CONCLUSIONSMeasuring antibodies to three viral antigens and identify neutralizing antibodies capable of disrupting spike-ACE2 interactions in high-throughput enables large-scale analyses of humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. The reagents are available to enable scaling up of standardized serological assays, permitting inter-laboratory data comparison and aggregation.

Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinated Ontario long-term care home residents and workers

Prioritizing Ontarios long-term care home (LTCH) residents for vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has drastically reduced their disease burden; however, recent LTCH outbreaks of variants of concern (VOCs) have raised questions regarding their immune responses. In 198 residents, mRNA vaccine dose 1 elicited partial spike and receptor binding domain antibody responses, while the second elicited a response at least equivalent to convalescent individuals in most residents. Residents administered mRNA-1273 (Moderna) mounted stronger total and neutralizing antibody responses than those administered BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). Two to four weeks after dose 2, residents (n = 119, median age 88) produced 4.8-6.3-fold fewer neutralizing antibodies than staff (n = 78; median age 47) against wild-type (with D614G) pseudotyped lentivirus, and residents administered BNT162b2 produced 3.89-fold fewer neutralizing antibodies than those who received mRNA-1273. These effects were exacerbated upon serum challenge with pseudotyped VOC spike, with up to 7.94-fold reductions in B.1.351 (Beta) neutralization. Cumulatively, weaker vaccine stimulation, age/comorbidities, and the VOC produced an [~]130-fold reduction in apparent neutralization titers in LTCH residents and 37.9% of BNT162b2-vaccinated residents had undetectable neutralizing antibodies to B.1.351. Continued immune response surveillance and additional vaccine doses may be required in this population with known vulnerabilities.

Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 persists 9 months post-symptoms with an altered T cell phenotype compared to influenza A virus-specific memory

SARS-CoV-2 induces T cell, B cell and antibody responses that are detected for several months in recovered individuals. Whether this response resembles a typical respiratory viral infection is a matter of debate. Here we followed T cell and antibody responses in 24 mainly non-hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 recovered subjects at two time points (median of 45- and 145-days post-symptom onset). Antibody responses were detected in 95% of subjects, with a strong correlation between plasma and salivary anti-S and anti-RBD IgG, as well as a correlation between circulating T follicular helper cells and the SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG response. Based on intracellular cytokine production or proliferation, CD4+ T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 were detected in all subjects, decaying with a half-life of 5-6 months for S-specific IL-2-producing cells. CD4+ responses were largely of the T helper 1 phenotype, but with a lower ratio of IFN-{gamma}: IL-2 producing cells and a lower frequency of CD8+: CD4+ T cells compared to influenza A virus-(IAV)-specific memory responses within the same subjects. Analysis of secreted molecules also revealed a lower ratio of IFN-{gamma}: IL-2 and IFN-{gamma}: IL-6 and an altered cytotoxic profile for S- and N-specific compared to IAV-specific responses. These data suggest that the memory T-cell phenotype after a single infection with SARS-CoV-2 persists over time, with an altered cytokine and cytotoxic profile compared to long term memory to IAV within the same subjects. One Sentence SummaryImmunity to SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of patients, mainly with mild COVID-19 disease, persists to 9 months with an altered T cell cytokine and cytotoxicity profile compared to influenza A virus-specific memory T cells from the same subjects.

The Humoral Response to the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients

ImportanceHemodialysis patients have an exceptionally high mortality from COVID-19 and this patient population often has a poor response to vaccinations. Randomized controlled trials for COVID-19 vaccines included few patients with kidney disease, therefore vaccine immunogenicity is uncertain in this population. ObjectiveEvaluate the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in chronic hemodialysis patients following one versus two doses of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination compared to health care worker controls and convalescent serum. DesignProspective observational cohort study. SettingSingle centre study in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants142 in-centre hemodialysis patients and 35 health care worker controls. ExposureBNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine. Main Outcomes and MeasuresSARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies to the spike protein (anti-spike), receptor binding domain (anti-RBD), and nucleocapsid protein (anti-NP) were measured in 66 hemodialysis patients receiving one vaccine dose following a public health policy change, 76 patients receiving two vaccine doses, and 35 health care workers receiving two vaccine doses. ResultsDetectable anti-NP suggestive of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 15/142 (11%) of patients at baseline while only three patients had prior RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19. Two additional patients contracted COVID-19 after receiving two doses of vaccine. In patients receiving a single BNT162b2 dose, seroconversion occurred in 53/66 (80%) for anti-spike and 35/66 (55%) for anti-RBD by 28 days post dose, but only 15/66 (23%) and 4/66 (6%), respectively attained a robust response as defined by reaching the median level of anti-spike and anti-RBD in convalescent serum from COVID-19 survivors. In patients receiving two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine, seroconversion occurred in 69/72 (96%) for anti-spike and 63/72 (88%) for anti-RBD by 2 weeks following the second dose while 52/72 (72%) and 43/76 (41%) reached the median convalescent serum level of anti-spike and anti-RBD, respectively. In contrast, 35/35 (100%) of health care workers exceeded the median level of anti-spike and anti-RBD found in convalescent serum 2-4 weeks after the second dose. Conclusions and RelevanceThis study confirms poor immunogenicity 28 days following a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in the hemodialysis population, supporting adherence to recommended vaccination schedules, and avoiding delay of the second dose in these at-risk individuals. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the serologic response to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in hemodialysis patients? FindingsIn this prospective observational study, humoral response was compared in 66 hemodialysis patients sampled 28 days after receipt of one dose of vaccine to 76 patients who received two doses of vaccine sampled 14 days after the second dose. Among those receiving one dose, 6% had anti-RBD response above the median level of convalescent serum versus 41% who received two doses. MeaningGiven that hemodialysis patients exhibit a poor humoral response to a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine, the second dose should not be delayed.

Surface and air contamination with SARS-CoV-2 from hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Toronto, Canada

BackgroundThe aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in air and on surfaces in rooms of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, and to identify patient characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination. MethodsNasopharyngeal swabs, surface, and air samples were collected from the rooms of 78 inpatients with COVID-19 at six acute care hospitals in Toronto from March to May 2020. Samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA and cultured to determine potential infectivity. Whole viral genomes were sequenced from nasopharyngeal and surface samples. Association between patient factors and detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in surface samples were investigated using a mixed-effects logistic regression model. FindingsSARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected from surfaces (125/474 samples; 42/78 patients) and air (3/146 samples; 3/45 patients) in COVID-19 patient rooms; 17% (6/36) of surface samples from three patients yielded viable virus. Viral sequences from nasopharyngeal and surface samples clustered by patient. Multivariable analysis indicated hypoxia at admission, a PCR-positive nasopharyngeal swab with a cycle threshold of [≤]30 on or after surface sampling date, higher Charlson co-morbidity score, and shorter time from onset of illness to sample date were significantly associated with detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in surface samples. InterpretationThe infrequent recovery of infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus from the environment suggests that the risk to healthcare workers from air and near-patient surfaces in acute care hospital wards is likely limited. Surface contamination was greater when patients were earlier in their course of illness and in those with hypoxia, multiple co-morbidities, and higher SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration in NP swabs. Our results suggest that air and surfaces may pose limited risk a few days after admission to acute care hospitals.

Evidence for sustained mucosal and systemic antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in COVID-19 patients

While the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively studied in blood, relatively little is known about the mucosal immune response and its relationship to systemic antibody levels. Since SARS-CoV-2 initially replicates in the upper airway, the antibody response in the oral cavity is likely an important parameter that influences the course of infection, but how it correlates to the antibody response in serum is not known. Here, we profile by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) IgG, IgA and IgM responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (full length trimer) and its receptor binding domain (RBD) in serum (n=496) and saliva (n=90) of acute and convalescent patients with laboratory-diagnosed COVID-19 ranging from 3-115 days post-symptom onset (PSO), compared to negative controls. Anti-CoV-2 antibody responses were readily detected in serum and saliva, with peak IgG levels attained by 16-30 days PSO. Whereas anti-CoV-2 IgA and IgM antibodies rapidly decayed, IgG antibodies remained relatively stable up to 105 days PSO in both biofluids. In a surrogate neutralization ELISA (snELISA), neutralization activity peaks by 31-45 days PSO and slowly declines, though a clear drop is detected at the last blood draw (105-115 days PSO). Lastly, IgG, IgM and to a lesser extent IgA responses to spike and RBD in the serum positively correlated with matched saliva samples. This study confirms that systemic and mucosal humoral IgG antibodies are maintained in the majority of COVID-19 patients for at least 3 months PSO. Based on their correlation with each other, IgG responses in saliva may serve as a surrogate measure of systemic immunity. One Sentence SummaryIn this manuscript, we report evidence for sustained SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and transient IgA and IgM responses both at the site of infection (mucosae) and systemically in COVID-19 patients over 3 months and suggest that saliva could be used as an alternative biofluid for monitoring IgG to SARS-CoV-2 spike and RBD antigens.

A simple protein-based SARS-CoV-2 surrogate neutralization assay

Most of the patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mount a humoral immune response to the virus within a few weeks of infection, but the duration of this response and how it correlates with clinical outcomes has not been completely characterized. Of particular importance is the identification of immune correlates of infection that would support public health decision-making on treatment approaches, vaccination strategies, and convalescent plasma therapy. While ELISA-based assays to detect and quantitate antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in patient samples have been developed, the detection of neutralizing antibodies typically requires more demanding cell-based viral assays. Here, we present a safe and efficient protein-based assay for the detection of serum and plasma antibodies that block the interaction of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) with its receptor, angiotensin converting-enzyme 2 (ACE2). The assay serves as a surrogate neutralization assay and is performed on the same platform and in parallel with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies against the RBD, enabling a direct comparison. The results obtained with our assay correlate with those of two viral based assays, a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) that uses live SARS-CoV-2 virus, and a spike pseudotyped viral-vector-based assay.

Early temporal dynamics of cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2

Type I interferons (IFNs) are our first line of defence against a virus. Protein over-expression studies have suggested the ability of SARS-CoV-2 proteins to block IFN responses. Emerging data also suggest that timing and extent of IFN production is associated with manifestation of COVID-19 severity. In spite of progress in understanding how SARS-CoV-2 activates antiviral responses, mechanistic studies into wildtype SARS-CoV-2-mediated induction and inhibition of human type I IFN responses are lacking. Here we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a mild type I IFN response in vitro and in moderate cases of COVID-19. In vitro stimulation of type I IFN expression and signaling in human airway epithelial cells is associated with activation of canonical transcriptions factors, and SARS-CoV-2 is unable to inhibit exogenous induction of these responses. Our data demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 is not adept in blocking type I IFN responses and provide support for ongoing IFN clinical trials. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/158154v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@193c540org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7b106forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1741cfforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bde68_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG GRAPHICAL SUMMARY C_FIG

The impact of thermal pasteurization on viral load in human milk and other matrices: A rapid review

Holder pasteurization (62.5{degrees}C, 30 min) of human milk (HM) is thought to reduce the risk of transmitting viruses to an infant. Some viruses may be secreted into milk - others may be contaminants. The effect of thermal pasteurization on viruses in HM has yet to be rigorously reviewed. The objective of this study is to characterize the effect of commonly used pasteurization techniques on viruses in HM and non-HM matrices. Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) were searched from inception to April 20th, 2020 for primary research articles assessing the impact of pasteurization on viral load or detection of live virus. Reviews were excluded, as were studies lacking quantitative measurements or those assessing pasteurization as a component of a larger process. Overall, 65,131 reports were identified, and 108 studies included. Pasteurization of HM at a minimum temperature of 56{degrees}C-60{degrees}C is effective at reducing detectable live virus. In cell culture media or plasma, coronaviruses (e.g., SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, MERS) are highly susceptible to heating at [≥]56{degrees}C. Although pasteurization parameters and matrices reported vary, all viruses studied, with the exception of parvoviruses, were susceptible to thermal killing. Future research important for the study of novel viruses should standardize pasteurization protocols and should test viral inactivation using a human milk matrix. Novelty bullets O_LIIn all matrices, including human milk, pasteurization at temperatures of 62.5{degrees}C was generally sufficient to reduce surviving viral load by several logs or to below the limit of detection. C_LIO_LIHolder pasteurization (62.5{degrees}C, 30 min) of human donor milk should be sufficient to inactivate non-heat resistant viruses, including coronaviruses, if present. C_LI

Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

We enrolled 53 consecutive in-patients with COVID-19 at six hospitals in Toronto, Canada, and tested one nasopharyngeal swab/saliva sample pair from each patient for SARS-CoV-2. Overall, sensitivity was 89% for nasopharyngeal swabs and 77% for saliva (p=NS); difference in sensitivity was greatest for sample pairs collected later in illness.

Sequence, infectivity and replication kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 isolated from COVID-19 patients in Canada

SARS-CoV-2 emerged in December 2019 in Wuhan, China and has since infected over 1.5 million people, of which over 107,000 have died. As SARS-CoV-2 spreads across the planet, speculations remain about the range of human cells that can be infected by SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we report the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from two COVID-19 patients in Toronto, Canada. We determined the genomic sequences of the two isolates and identified single nucleotide changes in representative populations of our virus stocks. More importantly, we tested a wide range of human immune cells for productive infection with SARS-CoV-2. Here we confirm that human primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are not permissive to SARS-CoV-2. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread globally, it is essential to monitor small nucleotide polymorphisms in the virus and to continue to isolate circulating viruses to determine cell susceptibility and pathogenicity using in vitro and in vivo infection models.