Career Development in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: What Do We Need?

OBJECTIVES: The Women in Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) subcommittee of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine identified 2 top priorities for 2021: career development and mentorship/sponsorship. The objective of this study was to catalog and delineate the career development domains for women physicians in PEM. METHODS: After a review of the literature to identify the key areas for gaps for women in PEM, we used Q sort methodology to elicit domains for this subcommittee to address by survey of a national sample. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen discrete potential areas of interest for career development were identified by the working group based on salient themes from the literature and personal experiences. Forty-one Women in PEM subcommittee members (27%) completed the survey. The career development topics were sorted into the domains of personal (40.4%; n = 46), administrative (28.1%; n = 32), research (10.5%; n = 12), teaching (10.5%; n = 12), service (7.0%; n = 8), and clinical (3.5%; n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the career development needs of women in PEM include a range of personal, teaching, research, administrative, clinical, and service domains. However, more than two-thirds of the career development topics were categorized into just 2 domains, administrative and personal.

COVID-19 Pneumonia and Status Asthmaticus With Respiratory Failure in a Pediatric Patient: A Simulation for Emergency Medicine Providers.

Introduction: During COVID-19 surges, medical trainees may perform patient care outside typical clinical responsibilities. While respiratory failure in pediatric patients secondary to COVID-19 is rare, it is critical that providers can effectively care for these children while protecting the health care team. Simulation is an important tool for giving learners a safe environment in which to learn and practice these new skills. Methods: In this simulation, learners provided care to a 13-year-old male with obesity, COVID-19 pneumonia, status asthmaticus, and respiratory failure. Target learners were pediatric emergency medicine fellows and emergency medicine residents. Providers were expected to identify the signs and symptoms of status asthmaticus, pneumonia, and respiratory failure and demonstrate appropriate evaluation and management while minimizing COVID-19 exposure. Participants completed a postsimulation survey on their satisfaction and confidence in performing the objectives. Results: Twenty-eight PGY 1-PGY 6 learners participated in this simulation. The postsimulation survey showed that most learners felt the simulation was effective in teaching the evaluation and management of respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (M = 5.0; 95% CI, 4.9-5.0) and was relevant to their work (M = 5.0; 95% CI, 5.0-5.0). Discussion: Learners felt that the case was effective in teaching the skills needed to care for a child with COVID-19 pneumonia, status asthmaticus, and respiratory failure. Future directions include updating the case with new COVID-19 knowledge and personal protective equipment practices gained over time, using hybrid telesimulation to increase learners' exposure to the case, and adapting the case for other health care providers.

Maintaining procedural skills for academic emergency medicine faculty: A needs assessment.

BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians require competence performing critical and routine procedures. The clinical practice of emergency medicine (EM) alone may be insufficient for the acquisition and maintenance of skills. Prior studies suggest the presence of trainees in academic settings and/or the low frequency of procedures increase the risk of skills attrition among faculty. We sought to develop a valid needs assessment survey to inform a faculty procedural skills (FPS) maintenance curriculum. METHODS: A Web-based FPS survey was designed to assess experiences performing procedures, self-reported confidence with procedures, and learning preferences for skills maintenance. The survey was administered at a large academic department of EM. Responses were analyzed to determine survey construct validity, faculty attitudes about procedural attrition, and preferred learning methods. RESULTS: Among EM faculty, confidence was significantly higher for common versus uncommon procedures (p < 0.001). EM faculty respondents reported significantly greater confidence than pediatric EM (PEM) faculty for both common adult procedures (EM mean = 3.7 [±0.3], PEM = 3.0 [±0.4], p < 0.001), and uncommon adult procedures (EM = 2.7 [±0.4], PEM = 2.1 [±0.5], p < 0.001). PEM faculty reported significantly greater confidence with pediatric procedures than EM faculty (PEM mean [±SD] = 3.5 [±0.8], EM = 2.2 [±0.8], p < 0.001). Nearly all faculty (93% [52/56]) agreed that procedural attrition is a concerning problem, and 80% (44/56) had personally experienced it. The most preferred learning methods were task trainers and simulation. Faculty preferred learning environments with faculty peers (91%) over mixed groups with trainees (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in procedural skills confidence between common and uncommon procedures, and between EM and PEM faculty, indicate that the FPS survey displayed appropriate construct validity. The finding that skills attrition is prevalent among EM and PEM faculty highlights the need for skill maintenance programming, preferably in peer groups employing task trainers and simulation.

A Case Report of Cake Frosting as a Source of Copper Toxicity in a Pediatric Patient.

INTRODUCTION: Copper is an uncommon source of metal toxicity in children that requires a high index of suspicion for diagnosis. CASE REPORT: We describe the unique presentation of a 12-month-old girl who developed acute onset of vomiting and diarrhea after ingestion of a copper-contaminated birthday cake. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the presentation, evaluation, and management of the rare pediatric patient who presents with copper poisoning. This case also illuminates the public health implications of potential metal poisoning when using non-edible decorative products in homemade and commercially prepared baked goods.

A systematic approach to the evaluation of acute unexplained crying in infants in the emergency department.

Crying is a common behavior of infancy that can be a signal of a broad spectrum of conditions ranging from the normal needs of hunger and sleep to significant medical or surgical pathology. In the medical setting, crying is often seen in concert with other signifiers of disease or distress, such as fever, vomiting, rash, or trauma. However, challenges in evaluation of infants may arise when crying is the only sign. A thorough, systematic, and appropriate history and physical examination are needed. Additionally, a broad range of medical possibilities coupled with caregiver concern need to be considered to ensure proper evaluation. In this issue, we will review crying as a chief complaint in the emergency department setting and provide a systematic and practical approach to the evaluation of crying infants.

Serum markers in acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: We have recently profiled inflammatory gene expression in acute appendicitis (AA) and identified a set of genes that are overexpressed in AA. The purpose of this study was to determine whether serum levels of a subset of proteins coded for by these overexpressed genes could differentiate patients with AA from those with other causes of abdominal pain and whether the serum levels of these proteins correlate with the histologic severity of appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from a convenience sample of children between 1 and 21 y of age who presented to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms/signs of AA. Patients were assigned to the proven appendicitis (AA) or nonappendicitis (control) group based on histologic findings, chart review, and follow-up phone calls. The serum levels of haptoglobin, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF), interleukin 8 (IL-8), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were compared between groups. For patients with histologically proven appendicitis, a histologic severity score was assigned and correlated with the levels of potential serum biomarkers. RESULTS: thirty-two patients were enrolled; 23 patients (72%) had AA. Serum levels of CRP and GCSF were significantly different between AA and control groups (7.0 versus 0.8, P=0.01 and 104.2 versus 58.7, P=0.03, respectively.) In patients with AA, there was significant correlation between GCSF serum levels and the appendicitis severity score [r=0.537, P=0.02]. CONCLUSIONS: GCSF serum levels can distinguish between patients with AA and controls. GCSF may prove to be a useful adjunctive test in the diagnosis and staging of acute appendicitis.