ABSTRACT
Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are a common type of fracture in adults. Although PHFs are common, bilateral presentation is extremely rare. Most PHFs are treated conservatively. In this report, we describe a 69-year-old right-hand-dominant male patient who was involved in a high-impact motor vehicle accident (MVA). The patient's upper limbs were in a fully extended position while he was holding the driving wheel, where he sustained a side impaction to the car by a hard object that caused bilateral four-part PHF with dislocation, which was confirmed on radiological investigations. The orthopedic surgery team believed that surgical treatment was necessary and ideal for these bilateral fracture dislocations, specifically bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). This is due to multiple factors, including the risk of humeral head avascular necrosis (AVN), the patient's advanced age, low demand, poor bone stock, osteoporosis, and a non-fixable fracture pattern. The patient underwent a single-stage bilateral RTSA procedure, which was well tolerated. He was optimized postoperatively. The post-operative X-ray showed good and satisfactory implant positions and orientation. Functional assessment using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were calculated at three-months follow-up (right-left: 50-60 and 41-14, respectively), at five-months follow-up (right-left: 34-66 and 38-14, respectively), and at eight-months follow-up (right-left: 40-68 and 24-7.5, respectively). Follow-up X-rays revealed good tuberosities healing, and no loosening or scapular notching. In addition, pain was assessed on a numerical rating scale (NRS), which demonstrated fast pain relief. Short-term follow-up with the patient demonstrated that he was satisfied with the surgery, especially the left side with a pain score on the NRS of one. We selected to share our experience of this complex case with our peers in the field of orthopedic surgery worldwide so that such a procedure could be implemented in similar cases to ensure satisfactory outcomes following bilateral four-part PHF with dislocation.
ABSTRACT
Background: There is limited evidence examining glenoid osteotomy as a treatment for posterior shoulder instability. Methods: A search of Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from the date of origin to 28th November 2019. Nine out of 3,408 retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria and quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies tool. Results: In 356 shoulders, the main indication for osteotomy was excessive glenoid retroversion (greater than or equal to approximately -10°). The mean preoperative glenoid version was -15° (range, -35° to -5°). Post-operatively, the mean glenoid version was -6° (range, -28° to 13°) and an average correction of 10° (range, -1° to 30°) was observed. Range of motion increased significantly in most studies and all standardized outcome scores (Rowe, Constant-Murley, Oxford instability, Japan Shoulder Society Shoulder Instability Scoring and mean shoulder value) improved significantly with high rates of patient satisfaction (85%). A high complication rate (34%, n = 120) was reported post-surgery, with frequent cases of persistent instability (20%, n = 68) and fractures (e.g., glenoid neck and acromion) (4%, n = 12). However, the revision rate was low (0.6%, n = 2). Conclusion: Glenoid osteotomy is an appropriate treatment for posterior shoulder instability secondary to excessive glenoid retroversion. However, the high rate of persistent instability should be considered when making treatment decisions.Level of Evidence: Systematic review; Level 4.
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is commonly misdiagnosed and underreported due to lack of awareness. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to summarize the current evidence related to SSS diagnosis and treatment to aid clinicians in managing the condition more effectively. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched for studies related to the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of SSS (database inception to March 2020). STUDY SELECTION: Databases were searched for available studies related to the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of SSS. STUDY DESIGN: A scoping review study design was selected to explore the breadth of knowledge in the literature regarding SSS diagnosis and treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Primary outcomes abstraction included accuracy of diagnostic tests, functional outcomes, and pain relief associated with various nonoperative and operative treatment options for SSS. RESULTS: A total of 1442 references were screened and 40 met the inclusion criteria. Studies commonly reported SSS as a clinical diagnosis and relied heavily on a focused history and physical examination. The most common signs reported were medial scapular border tenderness, crepitus, and audible snapping. Three-dimensional computed tomography had high interrater reliability of 0.972, with a 100% success rate in identifying symptomatic incongruity of the scapular articular surface. Initial nonoperative treatment was reported as successful in most symptomatic patients, with improved visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (7.7 ± 0.5 pretreatment, to 2.4 ± 0.6). Persistently symptomatic patients underwent surgical intervention most commonly involving bursectomy, superomedial angle resection, or partial scapulectomy. High satisfaction rates of surgery were reported in VAS (6.9 ± 0.7 to 1.9 ± 0.9), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (50.3 ± 12.2 to 80.6 ± 14.9), and mean simple shoulder test scores (5.6 ± 1.0 to 10.2 ± 1.1). CONCLUSION: Focused history and physical examination is the most crucial initial step in the diagnostic process, with supplemental imaging used to assess for structural etiologies when nonoperative management fails. Nonoperative management is as effective as surgical management in pain relief and is advised for 3 to 6 months before operative treatment.
