Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications.

The improved efficacy and generally favorable safety profile of recently approved and emerging antiobesity medications (AOMs), which result in an average weight reduction of ≥15%, represent significant advancement in the treatment of obesity. This narrative review aims to provide practical evidence-based recommendations for nutritional assessment, management, and monitoring of patients treated with AOMs. Prior to treatment, clinicians can identify preexisting nutritional risk factors and counsel their patients on recommended intakes of protein, dietary fiber, micronutrients, and fluids. During treatment with AOMs, ongoing monitoring can facilitate early recognition and management of gastrointestinal symptoms or inadequate nutrient or fluid intake. Attention should also be paid to other factors that can impact response to treatment and quality of life, such as physical activity and social and emotional health. In the context of treatment with AOMs, clinicians can play an active role in supporting their patients with obesity to improve their health and well-being and promote optimal nutritional and medical outcomes.

Approach to weight management in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease in a real-life clinical setting.

Objective: Excess adiposity represents a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and progression to end-stage kidney disease. Anti-Obesity Medications (AOMs) are vastly underutilized in patients with advanced CKD because of concerns related to safety and efficacy. This study was conducted to evaluate the real-world approach to weight management and the efficacy and safety of AOMs in people with advanced CKD. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of individuals with Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m2 and eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 referred to an academic medical weight-management program between 01/2015 and 09/2022. Evaluation of weight-management approaches, body weight change, treatment-related side effects, and reasons for treatment discontinuation were reported. Results: Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, 16 were treated with intensive lifestyle modifications (ILM) alone and 73 with AOMs (all treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist [GLP1-RA] +/- other AOMs) along with ILM. Patients treated with AOMs had a longer duration of on-treatment follow-up (median 924 days) compared to (93 days) the ILM group. Over 75% of patients treated with AOMs lost ≥5% body weight versus 25% of those treated with ILM. Only 15% of patients treated with AOMs discontinued therapy due to treatment-related side effects. Conclusion: In patients with obesity and advanced CKD, GLP-1RA-based anti-obesity treatment was well-tolerated, effective, and led to durable weight reduction.

Prevalence of Weight Stigma in Medical Settings Among Reproductive-Aged Women in the All of Us Study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze health care treatment experiences among a diverse cohort of reproductive-aged women from the All of Us study, focusing on variations due to body mass index (BMI). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study that used data from the All of Us Research Program. We analyzed weight bias among reproductive-aged women aged 18-44 years. Weight bias was assessed using a proxy 7-item survey that evaluated discrimination in health care experiences, including courtesy, respect, service quality, being treated as competent, displaying fear, being treated as inferior, and being listened to during health care visits. RESULTS: Overall, 16,791 reproductive-aged women (mean [SD] age, 35.8 [6.3]) were included in the study. Of 11,592 patients with data available on BMI, 582 were Asian (5.0%), 1,984 (17.1%) were Hispanic or Latinx, 1,007 (8.7%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 7,370 (63.6%) were non-Hispanic White. Approximately 24.2% of participants (n=2,878) had obesity, and 11.1% of participants (n=1,292) had severe obesity. In general, participants in higher BMI categories had negative experiences in the health care setting. Women with severe obesity were 1.5 to 2 times more likely to report poor experiences with their health care clinicians compared with women with healthy weight. CONCLUSION: Results show significant disparities in the health care experiences among reproductive-aged women. As participants' BMI category increased, so did their negative experiences in the health care setting. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to address these inequities. Health care systems must prioritize strategies to ensure that all individuals, regardless of weight or BMI, receive equitable and respectful care.

Association between asthma, obesity, and metabolic syndrome in adolescents and young adults.

BACKGROUND: The association of asthma and metabolic syndrome (MetS) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) remains unclear, as well as the role of obesity in this relationship. METHODS: AYAs aged 12-25 years who participated in the 2011-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included in this cross-sectional analysis. The moderating effect of obesity (age- and sex-adjusted body mass index ≥ 95th%ile for adolescents or ≥ 30 kg/m2 for adults) on asthma and MetS were evaluated in four groups: 1) both asthma and obesity; 2) asthma and no obesity; 3) obesity and no asthma; and 4) healthy controls with no obesity/asthma. RESULTS: A total of 7,709 AYAs (53.9% aged 12-18 years, 51.1% males, and 54.4% non-Hispanic White) were included in this analysis. 3.6% (95% CI 2.8-4.3%) had obesity and asthma, 7.6% (95% CI 6.8-8.4%) had asthma and no obesity, 21.4% (95% CI 19.6-23.2%) had obesity and no asthma, and 67.4% (95% CI 65.4-69.4%) had neither obesity nor asthma. The estimated prevalence of MetS was greater among those with both obesity and asthma versus those with only asthma (4.5% [95% CI 1.7-7.3%] vs. 0.2% [95% CI 0-0.5%], p < 0.001). Compared to healthy controls, those with both obesity and asthma had ∼10 times higher odds of having MetS (aOR 10.5, 95% CI 3.9-28.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the association between MetS and asthma is stronger in AYAs with BMI-defined obesity. Efforts to prevent and treat obesity may reduce MetS occurrence in AYAs with asthma.

Factors Associated with the Decision to Complete Bariatric Metabolic Surgery among a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of Adults: A Classification and Regression Tree Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Less than 50% of eligible candidates who are referred complete Bariatric Metabolic Surgery (BMS). The factors influencing the decision to complete BMS, particularly how these factors vary across different racial and ethnic groups, remain largely unexplored. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included adult patients referred to a bariatric surgeon or obesity medicine program between July 2019-September 2022. Sociodemographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI), anxiety, depression, body appreciation, and patient-physician relationship information were collected via survey and electronic health records. The association between BMS completion and potential decision-driving factors was examined using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 406 BMS -eligible patients participated in the study (mean [SD] age: 47.5 [11.6] years; 87.2% women; 18.0% Hispanic, 39% non-Hispanic Black [NHB], and 39% non-Hispanic White [NHW]; mean [SD] BMI: 45.9 [10.1] kg/m2). A total of 147 participants (36.2%) completed BMS. Overall, the most influential factor driving the decision to complete BMS was younger age (< 68.4 years), higher patient satisfaction, and BMI (≥ 38.0 kg/m2). Hispanic participants prioritized age (< 55.4 years), female sex, and body appreciation. For NHB participants, the highest ranked factors were age < 56.3 years, BMI ≥ 35.8 kg/m2, and higher patient satisfaction. For NHW patients, the most influential factors were age (39.1 to 68.6 years) and higher body appreciation. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight racial and ethnic group differences in the factors motivating individuals to complete BMS. By acknowledging these differences, healthcare providers can support patients from different backgrounds more effectively in their decision-making process regarding BMS.

Impact of employment status and work setting on body weight and health behaviors among people with obesity.

BACKGROUND: The impact of employment and the work-from-home (WFH) setting on body weight among people with obesity is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between employment status, WFH setting, and change in body weight among adults with obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients from an obesity medicine clinic completed an online survey in 2022 to assess health, work, and lifestyle behaviors. Multiple regression models examined the association between WFH status and change in body weight. RESULTS: The analytical sample included 380 patients (81.9% female, mean age 52.5 years, mean body mass index 43.25, 50.0% non-Hispanic White, 25.7% non-Hispanic Black, 18.7% Hispanic, 5.7% other ethnicity). During the pandemic, 28.7% were employed in a WFH setting (73.4% of this subgroup were in a WFH setting only), 36.1% were employed but not in a WFH setting, 11.8% were unemployed, and 23.4% were retired. Mean body weight change for participants who partially WFH during the pandemic was +5.4 (±7.2) % compared to those completely WFH -0.3 (±9.8) % (P = 0.006). After adjusting for key demographics, participants who were partially WFH gained 7.8% more weight compared to those completely WFH (ß= 7.28, SE = 1.91, p <  0.001). The most significant predictors for weight gain after adjusting for WFH frequency (partially vs. completely) included overeating (aOR 11.07, 95% CI 3.33-36.77), more consumption of fast food (aOR 7.59, 95% 2.41-23.91), and depression (aOR 6.07, 95% CI 1.97-18.68). CONCLUSION: These results show that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the WFH hybrid (combination of office and WFH) setting is associated with greater weight gain compared to those who completely WFH in people with obesity. Risk factors include overeating, higher fast food consumption, and depression.

Transoral gastric outlet reduction for post-prandial hypoglycemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Post-prandial hypoglycemia is an uncommon but disabling late complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Most patients can be treated with dietary interventions and medications; however, some patients develop refractory hypoglycemia that may lead to multiple daily episodes and seizures. While RYGB reversal surgery is an effective treatment, complication rates are high, and patients inevitably experience weight regain. Transoral gastric outlet reduction (TORe) is a minimally invasive treatment that is effective for early and late dumping syndrome. However, prior studies have not distinguished the effectiveness of TORe specifically for patients with post-prandial hypoglycemia. This study aims to describe a single institution's experience of TORe for treating post-prandial hypoglycemia. METHODS: This is a case series of patients with prior RYGB complicated by post-prandial hypoglycemia who underwent TORe from February 2020 to September 2021. Pre-procedural characteristics and post-procedural outcomes were obtained. Outcomes assessed included post-prandial hypoglycemia episodes, dumping syndrome symptoms, and weight change. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients underwent TORe from 2020 to 2021 for post-prandial hypoglycemia. Three (27%) patients had a history of seizures due to hypoglycemia. All had been advised on dietary changes, and ten patients (91%) were on medications for dumping. All patients reported a reduction in post-prandial hypoglycemic events as well as the majority of dumping syndrome symptoms during an average follow-up time of 409 ± 125 days. Ten patients (91%) had experienced weight regain from their post-RYGB nadir weight. For these patients, the average total body weight loss 12 months post-TORe was 12.4 ± 12%. There were no complications requiring hospitalization. One patient experienced post-TORe nausea and vomiting requiring dilation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis with resolution in symptoms. CONCLUSION: TORe is a safe and effective treatment for post-prandial hypoglycemia and weight regain after RYGB in patients with symptoms refractory to medications and dietary changes.

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Practice Pattern Survey.

PURPOSE: Obesity is a complex, chronic disease that is strongly associated with complications which cost the US healthcare system billions of dollars per year. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has emerged as a safe and effective procedure for treatment of obesity, but without practice guidelines there are likely to be variations practice. We sought to describe current practice patterns amongst endoscopists who perform ESG to help define areas of focus for future research and guideline development. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey to examine practice patterns related to ESG. The survey was organized in 5 sections: Endoscopic Practice, Training, and Resources; Pre-ESG Evaluation and Payment Model; Perioperative/Operative Period; Post-operative Period; and Endobariatric Practice Other Than ESG. RESULTS: A variety of exclusion criteria were reported by physicians performing ESG. Most respondents (n = 21/32, 65.6%) would not perform ESG for BMI under 27, and 40.6% (n = 13/32) would not perform ESG on patients with BMI over 50. The majority of respondents (74.2%, n = 23/31) reported ESG was not covered in their region, and most reported patients covered residual costs (67.7%, n = 21/31). CONCLUSIONS: We found significant variability with respect to practice setting, exclusion criteria, pre-procedural evaluation, and medication use. Without guidelines for the selection of patients or standards for pre- and post-ESG care, substantial barriers to coverage will remain, and ESG will remain limited to those who can meet out-of-pocket costs. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings, and future research should be focused on establishing patient selection criteria and standards in practices to provide guidance for endobariatric programs.

Depression and Anxiety as Predictors of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Completion Among Ethnically Diverse Patients.

BACKGROUND: Mental health conditions including depression and anxiety are often prevalent among metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) patients, but it is not known if these conditions predict the decision to complete the procedure and if this varies by race and ethnicity. This study aimed to determine if depression and anxiety are associated with MBS completion among a race/ethnically diverse sample of patients. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included participants who were referred to an obesity program or two MBS practices between August 2019 and October 2022. Participants completed the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) instrument to determine history of anxiety and/or depression, as well as MBS completion status (Y/N). Multivariable logistic regression models determined the odds of MBS completion by depression and anxiety status adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 413 study participants (87 % women, 40% non-Hispanic White, 39% non-Hispanic Black, and 18% Hispanic). Participants with a history of anxiety were less likely to complete MBS (aOR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.30-0.90, p = 0.020). Women had increased odds of a history of anxiety (aOR = 5.65, 95% CI = 1.64-19.49, p = 0.006) and of concurrent anxiety and depression (aOR = 3.07, 95% CI = 1.39-6.79, p = 0.005) compared to men. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that participants with anxiety were 48% less likely to complete MBS compared to those without anxiety. Additionally, women were more likely to report a history of anxiety with and without depression versus men. These findings can inform pre-MBS programs about risk factors for non-completion.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Consensus Statement: Addressing Stigma and Bias in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Obesity/Adiposity-Based Chronic Disease and Assessing Bias and Stigmatization as Determinants of Disease Severity.

OBJECTIVE: To focus on the intersection of perception, diagnosis, stigma, and weight bias in the management of obesity and obtain consensus on actionable steps to improve care provided for persons with obesity. METHODS: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) convened a consensus conference of interdisciplinary health care professionals to discuss the interplay between the diagnosis of obesity using adiposity-based chronic disease (ABCD) nomenclature and staging, weight stigma, and internalized weight bias (IWB) with development of actionable guidance to aid clinicians in mitigating IWB and stigma in that context. RESULTS: The following affirmed and emergent concepts were proposed: (1) obesity is ABCD, and these terms can be used in differing ways to communicate; (2) classification categories of obesity should have improved nomenclature across the spectrum of body mass index (BMI) using ethnic-specific BMI ranges and waist circumference (WC); (3) staging the clinical severity of obesity based on the presence and severity of ABCD complications may reduce weight-centric contribution to weight stigma and IWB; (4) weight stigma and internalized bias are both drivers and complications of ABCD and can impair quality of life, predispose to psychological disorders, and compromise the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions; (5) the presence and of stigmatization and IWB should be assessed in all patients and be incorporated into the staging of ABCD severity; and (6) optimal care will necessitate increased awareness and the development of educational and interventional tools for health care professionals that address IWB and stigma. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus panel has proposed an approach for integrating bias and stigmatization, psychological health, and social determinants of health in a staging system for ABCD severity as an aid to patient management. To effectively address stigma and IWB within a chronic care model for patients with obesity, there is a need for health care systems that are prepared to provide evidence-based, person-centered treatments; patients who understand that obesity is a chronic disease and are empowered to seek care and participate in behavioral therapy; and societies that promote policies and infrastructure for bias-free compassionate care, access to evidence-based interventions, and disease prevention.

Effectiveness of semaglutide versus liraglutide for treating post-metabolic and bariatric surgery weight recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of semaglutide versus liraglutide for treating post-metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) weight recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 207 adults with post-MBS weight recurrence treated with semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly (n = 115) or liraglutide 3.0 mg daily (n = 92) at an academic center from January 1, 2015, through April 1, 2021, was conducted. The primary end point was percentage body weight change at 12 months of treatment with regimens containing semaglutide or liraglutide. RESULTS: The mean sample age was 55.2 years; mean BMI was 40.4 kg/m2 ; 89.9% were female; and 50% completed sleeve gastrectomy, 29% completed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and 21% completed adjustable gastric banding. Least-squares mean weight change at 12 months was -12.92% versus -8.77% in the semaglutide and liraglutide groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratios were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.28-4.29) for ≥10% weight loss and 2.55 (95% CI: 1.22-5.36) for ≥15% weight loss over 12 months in the semaglutide group versus liraglutide group, respectively. Weight-loss efficacy of semaglutide (vs. liraglutide) did not differ by subgroups explored, including age, sex, and MBS procedure. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that treatment regimens including semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly lead to superior weight loss compared with liraglutide 3.0 mg daily for treating post-MBS weight recurrence, regardless of procedure type or the magnitude of weight recurrence.

The Role of Body Appreciation in the Decision to Complete Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Among Ethnically Diverse Patients.

PURPOSE: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an evidence-based safe, effective treatment for obesity. However, only half of referred or eligible persons complete the procedure for unknown reasons. The proposed study examined the association between the degree of body appreciation and the decision to complete MBS by ethnicity. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 409 participants who had been referred to a bariatric surgeon or an obesity medicine program between August 2019 and May 2022. Participants completed a survey about health behaviors and psychosocial characteristics, including body appreciation by MBS completion status (Y/N). Multivariate logistic regression models generated adjusted odd ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of body appreciation among MBS completers vs. non-completers. RESULTS: The sample mean age was 47.18 years (SD 11.63), 87% were female. 39.6% identified as non-Hispanic White (NHW), 38.5% as non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and 17.6% as Hispanic. Over a third of the sample (31.05%, n = 127) completed MBS. "Often" experiencing body appreciation was the most significant predictor of MBS completion (aOR: 28.19, 95% CI: 6.37-124.67, p-value < 0.001), followed by "Sometimes" (aOR: 20.47, 95% CI: 4.82-86.99, p-value < 0.001) and "Always" (aOR: 13.54, 95% CI: 2.55-71.87, p-value < 0.01) after controlling for sex, age, and race/ethnicity. There was not a significant interaction between body appreciation and race/ethnicity (p-value = 0.96). CONCLUSION: Results showed a significant association between body appreciation and MBS completion, controlling for sex, age, and race/ethnicity. MBS clinical settings may want to assess body appreciation as a pre-operative screener among ethnically diverse patients.

Obesity among Latinx people in the United States: A review.

Obesity is a serious, chronic disease that is associated with a range of adiposity-based comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. In the United States, obesity is a public health crisis, affecting more than 40% of the population. Obesity disproportionately affects Latinx people, who have a higher prevalence of obesity and related comorbidities (such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) compared with the general population. Many factors, including genetic predisposition, environmental factors, traditional calorie-dense Latinx diets, family dynamics, and differences in socioeconomic status, contribute to the increased prevalence and complexity of treating obesity in the Latinx population. Additionally, significant heterogeneity within the Latinx population and disparities in health care access and utilization between Latinx people and the general population add to the challenge of obesity management. Culturally tailored interventions have been successful for managing obesity and related comorbidities in Latinx people. Antiobesity medications and bariatric surgery are also important options for obesity treatment in Latinx people. As highlighted in this review, when managing obesity in the Latinx population, it is critical to consider the impact of genetic, dietary, cultural, and socioeconomic factors, in order to implement an individualized treatment strategy.

Telehealth utilization among multi-ethnic patients with obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The science of telemedicine has shown great advances over the past decade. However, the field needs to better understand if a change in care delivery from in-person to telehealth as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic will yield durable patient engagement and health outcomes for patients with obesity. The objective of this study was to examine the association of mode of healthcare utilization (telehealth versus in-person) and sociodemographic factors among patients with obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review identified patients with obesity from a university outpatient obesity medicine clinic and a community bariatric surgery practice. Patients completed an online survey (1 June 2020-24 September 2020) to assess changes in healthcare utilization modality during subsequent changes in infection rates in the geographic area. Logistic regression analysis examined the association of mode of healthcare utilization and key sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 583 patients (87% female, mean age 51.2 years (standard deviation 13.0), mean body mass index 40.2 (standard deviation 6.7), 49.2% non-Hispanic white, 28.7% non-Hispanic black, 16.4% Hispanic, 7% other ethnicity, 33.1% completed bariatric surgery) were included. Adjusted logistic regression models showed older age was inversely associated with telehealth use (adjusted odds ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.98) and non-Hispanic black were more likely to use telehealth compared to non-Hispanic white (adjusted odds ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.81). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic is impacting access to healthcare among patients with obesity. Telehealth is an emerging modality that can maintain healthcare access during the pandemic, but utilization varies by age and ethnicity in this high-risk population.

Discontinuation and reduction of asthma medications after metabolic and bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Obesity is a risk factor for asthma. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a safe and effective treatment option for obesity. Weight reduction via MBS, in turn, may improve asthma outcomes and decrease the need for asthma medications. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the available evidence focused on the impact of MBS on the improvement of asthma outcomes via the discontinuation and reduction of asthma medications. After a comprehensive search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases, 15 studies, including pre-post MBS data on asthma medication use among adults, were eligible for the systematic review. Thirteen studies reported the proportion of patient who discontinued asthma medication post-MBS and was meta-analyzed using random effects. Results showed 54% patients completely discontinued asthma medications (95% confidence interval 42%-67%, I2  = 86.2%, p < 0.001). The average number of asthma medications was also decreased by approximately 22%-46%. MBS provides strong therapeutic benefits for patients with asthma, as evidenced by the complete discontinuation of asthma medications in over 50% of MBS completers. The inference was limited by the small number, variations in follow-up time and rates, and heterogeneity of studies. Studies that include more ethnically diverse participant samples are needed to improve generalizability.

Association Between Patient Satisfaction With Their Patient-Physician Relationship and Completion of Bariatric Surgery by Race and Ethnicity Among US Adults.

Importance: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective and safe treatment for obesity and its comorbidities, but less than 50% of those who are eligible and referred for MBS complete the procedure. The patient-physician relationship could be a decisive factor in the decision to complete MBS; however, this relationship has not been explored, particularly among racially and ethnically diverse populations. Objective: To examine the association between patient-reported satisfaction with their patient-physician relationship and MBS completion by self-reported racial and ethnic group. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 408 patients who were referred to a bariatric surgeon or obesity medicine program between July 24, 2019, and May 19, 2022. Exposure: Patient satisfaction with their physician was measured by 7 dimensions (general satisfaction, technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with physician, and accessibility and convenience) using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form. Main Outcomes and Measures: Completion status for MBS (yes or no). Results: A total of 408 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.3 [11.6] years; among 366 with data available, 317 [86.6%] women and 49 [13.4%] men) were included in the study. Of 363 patients with data available on race and ethnicity, 66 were Hispanic/Latinx (18.2%), 136 (37.5%) were non-Hispanic Black, 146 (40.2%) were non-Hispanic White, and 15 (4.1%) were other race or ethnicity. A total of 124 patients (30.4%) completed MBS. Overall, the mean (SD) patient satisfaction score was significantly greater in MBS completers vs noncompleters (3.86 [0.56] vs 3.61 [0.64]; P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed technical quality was the most significant factor for MBS completion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.24-3.19]), followed by communication (aOR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.16-2.72]) and accessibility and convenience (aOR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.03-2.53]). The interaction between racial and ethnic groups and patient satisfaction was not significant (eg, mean [SD] score for Hispanic/Latinx completers, 3.95 [0.55] vs 3.77 [0.60] for non-Hispanic White completers; P = .46 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that there is an association between patient satisfaction with the patient-physician relationship and the decision to complete MBS regardless of race and ethnicity. These findings have important implications for strategies to improve the proportion of qualified patients who complete MBS to achieve improved health outcomes.

Changes in body weight, health behaviors, and mental health in adults with obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between body weight changes, health behaviors, and mental health in adults with obesity during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Between March 1, 2021, and November 30, 2021, adults from three obesity practices completed an online survey. The primary outcomes were ≥ 5% of body weight change since March 2020 and associated health behaviors and mental health factors. RESULTS: The sample (n = 404) was 82.6% female (mean age 52.5 years, mean BMI 43.3 kg/m2 ). Mean weight change was + 4.3%. Weight gain ≥ 5% was reported by 30% of the sample, whereas 19% reported ≥ 5% body weight loss. The degree of both weight gain and weight loss correlated positively with baseline BMI. Eighty percent of the sample reported difficulties with body weight regulation. Those who gained ≥ 5% versus those who lost ≥ 5% body weight were more likely to report higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression; less sleep and exercise; less healthy eating and home-cooked meals; and more takeout foods, comfort foods, fast foods, overeating, and binge eating. CONCLUSIONS: Weight gain in adults with obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with higher baseline BMI, deteriorations in mental health, maladaptive eating behaviors, and less physical activity and sleep. Further research is needed to identify effective interventions for healthier minds, behaviors, and body weight as the pandemic continues.