Emergency Medicine Physicians' Views on Providing Unnecessary Management in the Emergency Department.

Purpose: To assess the views of emergency medicine physicians (EMPs) on the practice of providing unnecessary medical management in the emergency department. Methods: All EMPs in Saudi Arabia were approached to participate in this cross-sectional study. A self-administered online survey that collected the participants' demographic information and opinions regarding the unnecessary management provided by EMPs in Saudi Arabia was conducted between December 2020 and February 2021. SPSS 22.0 was used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 181 EMPs returned the questionnaire. More than 80% of the participants believed that EMPs order unnecessary tests or procedures at least a few times per week. The major reasons for ordering unnecessary medical tests or procedures were "concern about malpractice issues" (60.8%), "not having enough time with a patient for meaningful discussion" (47%), and "just to be safe" (46.4%). More than 55% of the respondents also believed that EMPs are in the best position to address the problem of unnecessary testing. Conclusion: Most of the EMPs who participated in this study recognized that ordering unnecessary tests is a serious problem that happens on a daily basis. Many factors and reasons were described by the participants, and multiple possible solutions were suggested to help overcome the issue. Evaluating physicians' perspectives on the issue is a key step in addressing the problem and implementing appropriate interventions.

The revised Approved Instructional Resources score: An improved quality evaluation tool for online educational resources.

BACKGROUND: Free Open-Access Medical education (FOAM) use among residents continues to rise. However, it often lacks quality assurance processes and residents receive little guidance on quality assessment. The Academic Life in Emergency Medicine Approved Instructional Resources tool (AAT) was created for FOAM appraisal by and for expert educators and has demonstrated validity in this context. It has yet to be evaluated in other populations. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the AAT's usability in a diverse population of practicing emergency medicine (EM) physicians, residents, and medical students; solicited feedback; and developed a revised tool. METHODS: As part of the Medical Education Translational Resources: Impact and Quality (METRIQ) study, we recruited medical students, EM residents, and EM attendings to evaluate five FOAM posts with the AAT and provide quantitative and qualitative feedback via an online survey. Two independent analysts performed a qualitative thematic analysis with discrepancies resolved through discussion and negotiated consensus. This analysis informed development of an initial revised AAT, which was then further refined after pilot testing among the author group. The final tool was reassessed for reliability. RESULTS: Of 330 recruited international participants, 309 completed all ratings. The Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM) score was the component most frequently reported as difficult to use. Several themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: for ease of use-understandable, logically structured, concise, and aligned with educational value. Limitations include deviation from questionnaire best practices, validity concerns, and challenges assessing evidence-based medicine. Themes supporting its use include evaluative utility and usability. The author group pilot tested the initial revised AAT, revealing a total score average measure intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of moderate reliability (ICC = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0 to 0.962). The final AAT's average measure ICC was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.77 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: We developed the final revised AAT from usability feedback. The new score has significantly increased usability, but will need to be reassessed for reliability in a broad population.

Emergency department pain management: beyond opioids.

Pain is a common factor in many emergency department visits. While opioids remain a mainstay of treatment for many patients, prescription-opioid overuse and misuse have become epidemic in the United States. A lack of clear understanding of the pain management options available contributes to this problem, resulting in opioid overuse and over-prescription. National guidelines and consensus statements emphasize the importance of knowing nonopioid pharmacological and nonpharmacological options for treating patients with acute pain. This evidence-based review summarizes the pathophysiology of pain and pain syndromes and provides recommendations for a variety of nonopioid treatment options.

Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Current Options for Treatment and Cardiovascular Support.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy is a rare form of acute heart failure but the major cause of all deaths in pregnant patients with heart failure. Improved survival rates in recent years, however, emphasize the importance of early recognition and initiation of heart failure treatment. This article, therefore, attempts to raise awareness among cardiac and obstetric anesthesiologists as well as intensivists of this often fatal diagnosis. This review summarizes theories of the pathophysiology and outcome of peripartum cardiomyopathy. Based on the most recent literature, it further outlines diagnostic criteria and treatment options including medical management, mechanical circulatory support devices, and heart transplantation. Earlier recognition of this rare condition and a new generation of mechanical circulatory devices has contributed to the improved outcome. More frequently, patients in cardiogenic shock who fail medical management are successfully bridged to recovery on extracorporeal circulatory devices or survive with a long-lasting implantable ventricular assist device. The outcome of transplanted patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy, however, is worse compared to other recipients of heart transplants and warrants further investigation in the future.