Long-term follow-up of jaw osteomyelitis associated with bisphosphonate use in a tertiary-care center

OBJETIVES: This study reviews our experience in bisphosphonate-associated jaw osteomyelitis (BJOM), focusing on the incidence, etiology, treatment, and long-term outcome. Methods Retrospective review of the clinical histories adult patients diagnosed with BJOM (1995-2008) in a tertiary hospital. Results BJOM was found in 30 of 132 (22.7%) consecutive patients with jaw osteomyelitis. The percentage of BJOM cases increased from 8.7% (4/46) in 1995-2005 to 30.2% (26/86) in 2005-2008. Symptoms appeared in a median of 2.5 years after intravenous use, and 4.5 years after oral exposure. Viridans group streptococci were isolated in 83.3% of cases. Actinomyces spp. was found in 16 (39.0%) of 41 bone histologies. All included patients received a median of 6 months of appropiate antibiotic therapy and a surgical procedure (debridament and/or sequestrectomy). Thirteen of 27 cases (48.1%) with long-term follow-up (median 22 months, IQR 25-75 17-28) failed. Clinical failure defined as, persistent infection or relapse, was more frequent in patients receiving intravenous than oral bisphosphonates (11/16 [68.8%] vs. 2/11 [18.2%]; P < .05) and in cases with Actinomyces spp. (7/10 [70.0%] vs6/17 [35.3%]; P = .08).Conclusions Bisphosphonate therapy is now a frequent cause of JO. BJOM is difficult to cure and relapses are common, particularly in patients exposed to intravenous bisphosphonates

OBJETIVOS: Analizar la incidencia, la etiología, el tratamiento y la evolución clínica a largo plazo de la osteomielitis maxilar (OM) asociada al tratamiento con bifosfonatos (OMAB). MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de OMAB (1995-2008) en un hospital universitario. RESULTADOS: Fueron diagnosticadas 30OMAB de un total de 132OM. Desde el año 1995 al 2004 fueron diagnosticadas 4OMAB de 46OM (8,7%), y desde el año 2005 al 2008, 26 de 86 (30,2%). Los síntomas de osteomielitis aparecieron en una mediana de 2,5años en los pacientes que recibieron el tratamiento con bifosfonatos por vía intravenosa y una mediana de 4,5 años en los pacientes que lo recibieron por vía oral. En el 83,3% se aislaron Streptococcus del grupo viridans. En 16 (39%) de 41muestras enviadas para estudio histológico se constató la presencia de Actinomyces spp. Todos los pacientes fueron sometidos a desbridamiento quirúrgico y/o secuestrectomía y recibieron una mediana de 6meses de tratamiento antibiótico. Trece de los 27casos (48,1%) con seguimiento a largo plazo (mediana 22meses, IQR25-75 17-28) presentaron fracaso terapéutico. Estos fueron más frecuentes en pacientes que recibieron bifosfonatos por vía intravenosa en comparación con los que los recibieron por vía oral (11/16 [68,8%] vs 2/11 [18,2%], p < 0,05) y en los casos con Actinomyces spp. (7/10 [70,0%] vs 6/17 [35,3%], p = 0,08). CONCLUSIONES: Actualmente el tratamiento con bifosfonatos es causa frecuente de OM. Las recidivas son frecuentes en las OMAB, especialmente en pacientes expuestos a los bifosfonatos por vía intravenosa

Long-term follow-up of jaw osteomyelitis associated with bisphosphonate use in a tertiary-care center.

OBJECTIVES: This study reviews our experience in bisphosphonate-associated jaw osteomyelitis (BJOM), focusing on the incidence, etiology, treatment, and long-term outcome. METHODS: Retrospective review of the clinical histories adult patients diagnosed with BJOM (1995-2008) in a tertiary hospital. RESULTS: BJOM was found in 30 of 132 (22.7%) consecutive patients with jaw osteomyelitis. The percentage of BJOM cases increased from 8.7% (4/46) in 1995-2005 to 30.2% (26/86) in 2005-2008. Symptoms appeared in a median of 2.5 years after intravenous use, and 4.5 years after oral exposure. Viridans group streptococci were isolated in 83.3% of cases. Actinomyces spp. was found in 16 (39.0%) of 41 bone histologies. All included patients received a median of 6 months of appropiate antibiotic therapy and a surgical procedure (debridament and/or sequestrectomy). Thirteen of 27 cases (48.1%) with long-term follow-up (median 22 months, IQR 25-75 17-28) failed. Clinical failure defined as, persistent infection or relapse, was more frequent in patients receiving intravenous than oral bisphosphonates (11/16 [68.8%] vs. 2/11 [18.2%]; P < .05) and in cases with Actinomyces spp. (7/10 [70.0%] vs6/17 [35.3%]; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonate therapy is now a frequent cause of JO. BJOM is difficult to cure and relapses are common, particularly in patients exposed to intravenous bisphosphonates.

Antibioticoterapia intravenosa domiciliaria en el tratamiento de las infecciones causadas por microorganismos multirresistentes / Home intravenous antimicrobial therapy in multi-drug resistant microorganism infections

Background: Although home intravenous antimicrobial infusion therapy (HIVAIT) has proved its safety and efficacy in a great number of common infections, there are few published studies about its role in the treatment of infections caused by multi-drug resistant microorganisms. Our objectives are to study clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with multi-drug resistant microorganism infections treated with HIVAIT, and its usefulness in this type of infections. Methods: We analyzed all patients diagnosed of infections requiring HIVAIT and admitted to our Hospital at Home Unit (HHU) from March 2007 to February 2010. Subjects were divided into two groups: patients with multi-drug resistant microorganism infections as a study group, and the remaining patients as a control group. Results: A total of 487 patients were included, 82 in the study group. Comorbidity and physical dependence were higher in this group than in the control group (p=0.000 and p=0.002 respectively). The majority of patients were discharged because of a satisfactory clinical evolution. However, 17 (20.7%) patients in the study group required readmission to hospital during treatment and another 22 (26.8%) were re-admitted to hospital 3 months after discharge from HHU. There were significant differences between the results from the control group in clinical readmissions. Conclusions: Patients with multi-drug resistant microorganism infections and HIVAIT have higher comorbidity, physical dependence, and frequency of hospital readmissions. However, HIVAIT is useful in this kind of infections if the patients are appropriately selected (AU)

Fundamento: La antibioticoterapia intravenosa domiciliaria (AID) ha demostrado su seguridad y eficacia en un gran número de infecciones comunes. Sin embargo, existen pocos trabajos publicados sobre su papel en el tratamiento de las infecciones causadas por bacterias multirresistentes. Los objetivos de este trabajo son definir las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de los pacientes con infecciones causadas por microorganismos multirresistentes tratados con AID, así como estudiar su utilidad en este tipo de infecciones. Material y método: Analizamos todos los pacientes que por requerir AID ingresaron en nuestra Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio (UHD) desde marzo de 2007 hasta febrero de 2010. Los pacientes se dividieron en dos grupos: los pacientes con infecciones causadas por microorganismos multirresistentes fueron incluidos en el grupo a estudio, mientras que el resto de pacientes formó el grupo control. Resultados: Se incluyeron 487 pacientes, de los cuales 82 formaron el grupo a estudio. La comorbilidad y la dependencia física en este grupo fueron mayores que en el grupo control (p=0,000 y p=0,002 respectivamente). La mayoría de los pacientes tuvieron una evolución clínica satisfactoria. Sin embargo, 17 (20,7%) pacientes del grupo a estudio reingresaron durante el tratamiento y otros 22 (26,8%) reingresaron 3 meses después del alta definitiva de nuestra unidad, siendo las diferencias entre ambos grupos estadísticamente significativas. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con infecciones causadas por microorganismos multirresistentes y AID tienen mayor comorbilidad, dependencia física y frecuencia de reingresos hospitalarios. Sin embargo, la AID es útil en el tratamiento de este tipo de infecciones en pacientes adecuadamente seleccionados (AU)

[Home intravenous antimicrobial therapy in multi-drug resistant microorganism infections]. / Antibioticoterapia intravenosa domiciliaria en el tratamiento de las infecciones causadas por microorganismos multirresistentes.

BACKGROUND: Although home intravenous antimicrobial infusion therapy (HIVAIT) has proved its safety and efficacy in a great number of common infections, there are few published studies about its role in the treatment of infections caused by multi-drug resistant microorganisms. Our objectives are to study clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with multi-drug resistant microorganism infections treated with HIVAIT, and its usefulness in this type of infections. METHODS: We analyzed all patients diagnosed of infections requiring HIVAIT and admitted to our Hospital at Home Unit (HHU) from March 2007 to February 2010. Subjects were divided into two groups: patients with multi-drug resistant microorganism infections as a study group, and the remaining patients as a control group. RESULTS: A total of 487 patients were included, 82 in the study group. Comorbidity and physical dependence were higher in this group than in the control group (p=0.000 and p=0.002 respectively). The majority of patients were discharged because of a satisfactory clinical evolution. However, 17 (20.7%) patients in the study group required readmission to hospital during treatment and another 22 (26.8%) were re-admitted to hospital 3 months after discharge from HHU. There were significant differences between the results from the control group in clinical readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with multi-drug resistant microorganism infections and HIVAIT have higher comorbidity, physical dependence, and frequency of hospital readmissions. However, HIVAIT is useful in this kind of infections if the patients are appropriately selected.

Impacto de las revistas biomédicas españolas / Impact of Spanish biomedical journals

No disponible

Factores de riesgo de infección por Clostridium difficile en pacientes ancianos. Estudio de casos y controles / Factors for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in elderly patients. A case-control study

Fundamento: Estudiar los principales factores de riesgo de infección por Clostridium difficile en una unidad de geriatría. Pacientes y método: Estudio de casos y controles retrospectivo. Resultados: El análisis multivariante confirmó la nutrición enteral por sonda nasogástrica (OR = 6,73; IC del 95 por ciento, 1,01-45,35) y los días de tratamiento antibiótico (OR = 1,15; IC del 95 por ciento, 1,01-1,28) como factores de riesgo independientes para la infección por C. difficile. Conclusiones: El tratamiento antibiótico, el sondaje nasogástrico y las características de fragilidad de este grupo de pacientes se asocian a la infección por C. difficile. (AU)