Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 418-429, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38420695

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study presents a budget impact analysis (BIA) conducted in Saudi Arabia, evaluating the cost implications of adopting semaglutide, tirzepatide, or dulaglutide in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. The analysis aims to assess the individual budgetary impact of these treatment options on healthcare budgets and provide insights for decision-makers. METHODS: A prevalence-based BIA was developed using real-world and clinical trials data. The model considered disease epidemiology, medication prices, diabetes management expenses, cardiovascular (CV) complications costs, and weight reduction savings over a 5-year time horizon. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (OWSA, PSA) were performed to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period, the cumulative budget impact for semaglutide, tirzepatide, and dulaglutide were 85,923,089 USD, 169,790,195 USD, and 94,558,356 USD, respectively. Hypothetical scenarios considering price parity between semaglutide and tirzepatide are associated with financial impacts of 85,923,091 USD and 86,475,335 USD, respectively. In the public sector, semaglutide showed the lowest incidence of 3-point major adverse CV events (3P-MACE), with tirzepatide leading in weight loss and HbA1c reduction, and dulaglutide presenting the highest 3P-MACE rates and least improvements in HbA1c and weight. A breakeven analysis suggested that tirzepatide's list price would need to be $199.91 lower than its current list price to achieve budget impact parity with semaglutide based on currently available evidence. Results from the OWSA suggested that risk reductions for CV events were key drivers of budget impact. PSA results were confirmatory of base-case analyses. CONCLUSIONS: CV cost-offsets and drug acquisition considerations may make semaglutide a favorable use of resources for Saudi budget planners and decision-makers. These results were robust to assumptions regarding the list price of tirzepatide.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Male , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Saudi Arabia , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists , Glycated Hemoglobin , Prostate-Specific Antigen/therapeutic use , Glucagon-Like Peptides/therapeutic use , Weight Loss , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor
2.
Cureus ; 12(10): e11047, 2020 Oct 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33224644

ABSTRACT

Introduction Many factors affect the required dose of warfarin, including body weight, which is mentioned only in a few studies. Our study was conducted using body mass index (BMI) to assess the requirements for warfarin dosing. Methods A retrospective study was conducted that included adults who used warfarin for more than three months, with at least two consecutive international ratio (INR) readings within the therapeutic range. Results Over 301 patients were included; the 20% higher dose of warfarin was required in obese patients than normal BMI and overweight patients (32.2 ± 15.2 vs. 27.4 ±17.3 and 26.8 ± 12.7; p=0.013, respectively). Conclusion Obese patients required a higher dose than other patients, which should be considered when initiating or adjusting the warfarin dose.

3.
BMJ Open ; 6(6): e011100, 2016 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27324712

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown that dentists have a higher incidence of work-related musculoskeletal (MSK) pain than those in other occupations. The risk factors contributing to MSK pain among Saudi dentists has not been fully studied so this study aims to estimate the prevalence of MSK pain and investigate its associated risk factors among dentists in Saudi Arabia. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in the capital city Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using random cluster sampling. 224 surveys were distributed among dentists with a 91.1% response rate (101 women and 103 men). OUTCOMES: The prevalence of MSK pain and its associated risk factors were investigated. RESULTS: 184 (90.2%) respondents reported having MSK pain. Lower back pain was the most commonly reported MSK pain (68.1%). Gender and age were reported to be predictors for at least one type of MSK pain. Older age was associated with lower back pain (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.50) and women had double the risk of shoulder pain (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.12 to 5.68). In addition, lower back pain was related to the time the dentist spent with patients (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.54), while shoulder pain (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.06) and lower back pain (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.10) were significantly related to years of experience. CONCLUSIONS: MSK pain is common among older and female Saudi dentists. Research on the impact of exercise and the ergonomics of the workplace on the intensity of MSK pain and the timing of its onset is required.


Subject(s)
Dentists/statistics & numerical data , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Shoulder Pain/epidemiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Risk Factors , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
J Arthroplasty ; 28(9): 1463-72, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23528548

ABSTRACT

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been used in orthopedic patients to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). The purpose of this systematic review of randomized clinical trials is to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative administration of ESAs on hemoglobin level at discharge and frequency of ABT in patients undergoing hip or knee surgery. Pooled results of 26 trials with 3560 participants showed that the use of preoperative ESAs reduced ABT in patients undergoing hip or knee surgery [RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.60, P<0.00001]. Hemoglobin mean difference between ESA and control groups was 7.16 (g/L) [95% CI of 4.73 to 9.59, P=0.00001]. There was no difference in the risk of developing thromboembolism between ESA and control groups [RD: 0, 95 % CI: -1%-2%, P=0.95]. ESAs offer an alternative blood conservation method to avoid ABT in patients undergoing hip or knee surgery.


Subject(s)
Anemia/therapy , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Anemia/blood , Blood Transfusion , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Preoperative Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...