ABSTRACT
This case-control study compared sociodemographic variables, lifestyle and certain anthropometric parameters of 50 patients hospitalized with colorectal cancer with those of 50 age- and sex-matched controls at a referral hospital in Riyadh. Among cases, females were generally more affected by gastrointestinal symptoms and 4% of male patients had a family history of colorectal cancer. Unlike weight and height, body mass index did not differ between cases and controls, but poor knowledge of high-fibre diets was a significant factor. Regression analysis showed low education level, unemployment and not taking exercise regularly were significant risk factors for colorectal cancer. Better education and awareness of colorectal cancer screening is recommended.
Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Sedentary Behavior , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Anthropometry , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Educational Status , Female , Health Education , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospitalization , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , UnemploymentABSTRACT
This case-control study compared sociodemographic variables, lifestyle and certain anthropometric parameters of 50 patients hospitalized with colorectal cancer with those of 50 ageand sex-matched controls at a referral hospital in Riyadh. Among cases, females were generally more affected by gastrointestinal symptoms and 4% of male patients had a family history of colorectal cancer. Unlike weight and height, body mass index did not differ between cases and controls, but poor knowledge of high-fibre diets was a significant factor. Regression analysis showed low education level, unemployment and not taking exercise regularly were significant risk factors for colorectal cancer. Better education and awareness of colorectal cancer screening is recommended
Subject(s)
Case-Control Studies , Life Style , Anthropometry , Risk Factors , Exercise , Dietary Fiber , Health Education , Awareness , Surveys and Questionnaires , Colorectal NeoplasmsABSTRACT
We compared the effects of three levels of dietary protein, i.e., 7% (low protein; LP); 17.5% (adequate protein; CON); or 30% (high protein; HP) on growth of functionally overloaded muscle in Sprague-Dawley male rats. Growth of plantaris and soleus muscles was induced by the surgical removal of gastrocnemius muscles in one hindlimb; muscles in the other leg were used as sham-operated, intra-animal controls. After 4 wk, rats fed the 7% LP diet gained less weight (-29%) and had lighter livers (-20%) and kidneys (-16%) than rats fed the CON diet (P < 0.05). Measurements of rats fed the 30% HP diet were not different from those of CON rats except that their kidneys were larger (+6%) (P < 0.05). The level of dietary protein did not affect the experimentally induced muscular growth in either plantaris or soleus muscles. Gains in overloaded plantaris muscles over sham-operated muscles were not different among rats fed LP, CON and HP diets for muscle mass (+42 to +45%), total protein (+42 to +46%) and myofibrillar protein (+40 to +44%). Soleus muscles also did not differ among diet groups for gains in mass (+20 to +33%), total protein (+20 to +33%) and myofibrillar protein (+21 to +33%). No dietary protein effects were found on myosin heavy chain isoform (I, IIa, IIx, IIb) expression in either plantaris or soleus muscles. We conclude that gains in plantaris and soleus muscle mass, total protein and myofibrillar protein induced by functional overload are not affected by low (7%) or high (30%) protein feeding in young male rats for 4 wk.
