Safety of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Aneurysm: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) among patients with thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysms (AA). Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we explored the safety of TAVR among patients with a diagnosis of AA. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample database (2012-2017) for hospitalized patients undergoing TAVR, using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for endovascular TAVR. Reports show that > 95% of endovascular TAVR in the US is via transfemoral access, so our population are mostly patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. Using propensity score matching, we compared the trends and outcomes of TAVR procedures among patients with versus without AA. RESULTS: From a total sample of 29,517 individuals who had TAVR procedures between January 2012 and December 2017, 910 had a diagnosis of AA. In 774 matched-pair analysis, all-cause in-hospital mortality was similar in patients with and without AA OR 0.63 [(95% CI 0.28-1.43), p = 0.20]. The median length of stay was higher in patients with AA: 4 days (IQR 2.0-7.0) versus 3 days (IQR 2.0-6.0) p = 0.01. Risk of AKI [OR 1.01 (0.73-1.39), p = 0.87], heart block requiring pacemaker placement [OR 1.17 (0.81-1.69), p = 0.40], aortic dissection [OR 2.38 (0.41-13.75), p = 0.25], acute limb ischemia [OR 0.46 (0.18-1.16), p = 0.09], vascular complications [OR 0.80 (0.34-1.89), p = 0.53], post-op bleeding [OR 1.12 (0.81-1.57), p = 0.42], blood transfusion [OR 1.20 (0.84-1.70), p = 0.26], and stroke [OR 0.58 (0.24-1.39), p = 0.25] were similar in those with and without AA. CONCLUSIONS: Data from a large nationwide database demonstrated that patients with AA undergoing TAVR are associated with similar in-hospital outcomes compared with patients without AA.

Outcomes in Hospitalization in Patients with Heart Failure Undergoing Remote Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Major Trials.

Heart failure is a leading global pandemic and a cause of economic burden. Although, treatments exist to help symptomatic alleviation, patient compliance and monitoring is the basis of ensuring efficacy. With devices that allow for remote wireless PA pressure monitoring such as CardioMEMS, the inconsistency in patient reporting and factors such as symptoms and hospitalizations can be reduced. A systematic review and meta-analysis utilizing the MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus database was performed to identify randomized and non-randomized clinical trials evaluating baseline characteristics and hospitalizations. Five trials for the systematic review and 2 trials for the meta-analysis meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Baseline characteristics included an average age of 64.6 years, male predominance, mean BMI of 29.6, predominance of HFrEF, hypertension the most prevalent comorbidity, and a mean PA pressure of 27.2 mm Hg. The follow-up periods ranged from 90 days to 12 months. There was a total of 64 adverse events, mostly non-serious. Patients who underwent remote PA monitoring were less likely to be hospitalized compared with patients who did not (Odds Ratio: 0.52; 95% Confidence Interval 0.39, 0.69). Remote PA pressure monitoring allows for reduced hospitalizations. With the recent and now resurging SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, devices such as CardioMEMS can allow for heart failure patients to be managed from home to not only reduce hospitalizations but for symptom prevention and management.

Outcomes With sGC Therapy in Patients With HFpEF: A Meta-Analysis of Prior Trials.

Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) agents have been shown to have possible beneficial effects in heart failure treatment. Unfortunately, the role of sGC in HFpEF has not been shown to be efficacious based on recent trials. The CAPACITY HFpEF and VITALITY-HFpEF trials independently showed that sGC does not improve 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance or the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) physical limitation score (PLS). The objective of this study was to analyze current data on the 6MWT and KCCQ PLS score from trials that included patients with HFpEF treated with sGC. Using MEDLINE and Cochrane databases, meta-analysis and systematic review was performed looking at data in the CAPACITY HFpEF and VITALITY-HFpEF trials.  For safety analysis we evaluated serious adverse events between the CAPACITY HFpEF, VITALITY-HFpEF, SOCRATES-PRESERVED, and DILATE-1trials. A total of 2 trials were analyzed to assess 6MWT and KCCQ score. The total number of combined patients from both trials assessing 6MWT distance in sGC vs placebo therapy were 620 with 309 in the treatment group and 311 in the placebo group. The total number of combined patients from both trials assessing KCCQ score outcomes were 583 with 280 in the treatment group and 303 in the placebo group. A total of 4 trials were evaluated for safety analysis with a total of 987 patients with 529 in the treatment group and 458 in the placebo group. The analysis did not demonstrate significant difference in 6MWT (P = 0.97), KCCQ PLS (P = 0.83), or serious adverse events (P = 0.67).

Age-specific trends and outcomes of hospitalizations with acute heart failure in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the age-specific temporal trends, in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for acute heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the age-specific differences in the trends and outcomes of hospitalizations with acute HF. METHODS: The National Inpatients Sample database years 2002-2016 and the National Readmissions Database years 2013-2016 were used to identify primary hospitalizations for acute HF. We analyzed the age-specific temporal trends, in-hospital outcomes, and readmissions for acute HF. RESULTS: The annual rate of hospitalizations for acute HF declined from 456 per 100,000 people in 2002 to 356 per 100,000 people in 2016 (Ptrend < 0.001). The decline was observed among all age groups, except those aged 18-44 years. There was a decline in in-hospital mortality among all age groups, except for those aged 18-34 years. Compared with 18-34 years, adjusted in-hospital mortality was lower among 35-44 years (odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.82) and 45-54 years (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.83-0.91) but higher among 55-64 years (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.54-1.67) and ≥ 75 year (OR 2.54; 95% CI 2.44-2.64). Compared with 18-34 years, 30-day HF-related readmissions were significantly lower in older age groups (>34 years). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide contemporary analysis demonstrated a decline in the annual rates of hospitalizations with acute HF across all age categories except those aged 18-44 years. There was a reduction in rates of in-hospital mortality among middle-aged and older patients, but not in those aged 18-34. In-hospital mortality exhibited a dichotomous relationship with age. There was an inverse relationship between age and 30-days HF readmissions.

Left Ventricular Rupture After Impella® Placement During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Ventricular perforation is a rare complication during a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when supported by Impella® (Abiomed). However, instrumentation of the left ventricle several days after transmural infarct potentially increases susceptibility for perforation. While a patient is on Impella support, physicians should review ventriculograms carefully to detect perforation and should consider the presence of a decompressed ventricle, the absence of normal systolic pressure and the movement of contrast from the ventricle into the aorta bypassing the left ventricular ejection. Immediate removal of the Impella if a perforation occurs must be avoided. Retrieving the device would risk a catastrophic bleed, while alternative repair techniques are available. Here, we describe a patient with a left ventricle perforation that occurred during a high-risk PCI supported by an Impella device. ANNOTATED SUMMARY: The repair of a left ventricle perforation during high-risk PCI in a patient who had an unrecognized left ventricular perforation is described. Physicians are encouraged to carefully review ventriculograms to identify the subtle changes that can indicate a perforation. Further, immediate removal of the temporary LVAD should be avoided to minimize the risk of catastrophic bleeds.

Sudden cardiac arrest in end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis: A nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is frequently encountered in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on dialysis. There is a dearth of national data on SCA-associated outcomes in this specific patient population. The aim of the present study is to study these parameters from a nationally representative US population. METHODS: Data were extracted from National Inpatient Sample database from October 2005 to December 2014. All patients with clinical encounter of dialysis during the study period were enrolled. Patients who underwent SCA, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular flutter were then identified by applying relevant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Patients with acute kidney injury and prior renal transplant were excluded. Propensity matching was done to balance covariates among study groups. Logistic regression analysis was done to assess for predictors of SCA-associated mortality in ESRD patients on dialysis. RESULTS: A total of 1 147 760 patients were included in the final analyses. Patients who suffered SCA were older when compared to the non-SCA cohort and had a higher burden of comorbidities. About half (52.10%) of ESRD patients who suffered SCA died. Advanced age, metabolic acidosis, and cardiogenic shock were independently associated with reduced survival after SCA. New implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation continues to be low in this patient population at discharge. CONCLUSION: SCA in settings of ESRD on dialysis carries high mortality and frequent morbidity. Further research in therapeutic interventions that could prevent SCA in this vulnerable population is utmost needed.

Transcatheter closure of an aortoatrial fistula following a surgical aortic valve replacement.

Aorto-atrial fistulas are rare complications of aortic valve replacement. We report a case of a post-aortic valve replacement aorto-atrial fistula that was closed percutaneously with an Amplatz Ductal Occluder-II device.