The efficacy of bupivacaine infiltration along nephrostomy tract on postoperative pain control and opioid consumption after PCNL: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common endourological procedure for patients with large kidney stones, but the management of postoperative pain is still a major challenge. The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.25% bupivacaine infiltration along the nephrostomy tract on postoperative pain scores and analgesia consumption in patients who underwent PCNL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients who underwent PCNL were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial (NCT04160936). Patients were prospectively randomized into two equal groups: the study group (n=25) received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine infiltration along the nephrostomy tract, whereas patients in the control group (n=25) did not. Postoperative pain as the primary outcome was assessed by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a dynamic visual analogue scale (DVAS) at different time points. The secondary outcomes were the time for first opioid demands, the number of opioid demands, and the total opioid consumption over the 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding demographics, surgery, and stone characteristics. Patients in the study group had significantly less VAS and DVAS pain scores compared to the control group. The mean time of the first opioid demand in the study group was significantly longer as compared to the control group (7.1 ± 2.5h vs. 3.2 ± 1.8 h, p<0.001). The mean number of doses and total consumption of opioids were significantly less in the study group compared to the control group over 48 h (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 2.9 ± 0.7 and 122.82 ± 62.5 mg vs. 223 ± 70 mg, respectively) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthetic infiltration of 0.25% bupivacaine along the nephrostomy tract is efficient in alleviating post-operative pain and reducing opioid consumption after PCNL.

Biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in a clinical practice setting: experience from the PRESENT study.

AIM: The Physicians' Routine Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of NovoMix 30 Therapy (PRESENT) study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a 6-month, prospective, multinational, multiethnic observational study involving 21 977 patients from 13 countries (India, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates). The patients were transferred to BIAsp 30 with or without oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) from prior treatment with OAD (n = 8583), insulin (n = 5942), OAD + insulin (n = 4673) or diet (i.e. treatment naive) (n = 1707). One thousand and seventy-two patients had incomplete or no information on previous treatment. RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months, significant reductions from baseline were observed in the mean haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) (-1.33 and -1.81%), fasting plasma glucose (-3.02 and -3.74 mmol/l) and postprandial plasma glucose (-4.76 and -5.82 mmol/l) (p < 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved target HbA(1c) of less than 7% at 3 months (15.3%) and 6 months (27.7%) compared with baseline (4.8%) (p < 0.001). Overall, the mean HbA(1c) at 6 months was lowered in patients regardless of prior treatment: -2.15% (OAD), -1.45% (insulin), -1.47% (OAD + insulin) and -2.35% (treatment naive). In the overall cohort, the rate of total hypoglycaemia was reduced from 5.4 events per patient-year at baseline to 2.2 events per patient-year at study end (p < 0.001). Among prior treatment subgroups, the rates of total hypoglycaemia were reduced from 2.5 to 2.1 events per patient-year in the OAD group, from 9.6 to 2.2 events per patient-year in the insulin group and from 7.6 to 2.5 events per patient-year in the OAD + insulin group but were increased from 1.0 to 1.8 events per patient-year in the treatment-naive group (p < 0.001). There were 444 adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including 13 serious ADRs: lipodystrophy (three events), symptoms of generalized hypersensitivity (two events), acute painful neuropathy (one event), worsening of diabetic retinopathy (one event), oedema (one event) and unspecified ADRs (five events). CONCLUSION: The use of BIAsp 30 monotherapy or in combination with OADs in clinical practice was effective and safe in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Transferring type 2 diabetes patients with uncontrolled glycaemia from biphasic human insulin to biphasic insulin aspart 30: experiences from the PRESENT study.

AIM: The Physician's Routine Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of NovoMix* 30 Therapy (PRESENT) aims to assess the safety and efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp30) used in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a large, multi-national, multi-centre, prospective, 6-month study in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who were prescribed BIAsp30. Efficacy endpoints included changes in HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPPG), and proportion who achieved target HbA(1c) < 7%. Changes from baseline were analysed using paired t-test. Safety endpoints were incidence and rate of hypoglycaemic episodes. A subgroup of patients previously uncontrolled (HbA(1c) > or = 7.0%) on biphasic human insulin (BHI) were analysed. RESULTS: Glycaemia improved significantly (mean +/- SD): HbA(1c) by 1.58 +/- 1.69% points (from 9.32 +/- 1.64% to 7.70 +/- 1.29%), FPG by 2.92 +/- 3.71 mmol/L and PPPG by 4.75 +/- 4.87 mmol/L. The incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes decreased over time, from 38.7% (baseline) to 20.8% (6 months). Episodes were mostly minor (reduced from 37.7 to 20.6% at 6 months), occurring during the day (reduced from 31.5 to 17.1% at 6 months). Major episodes were less frequently reported (reduced from 5.0 to 0.4% at 6 months). The rate of hypoglycaemia (episodes/patient year) from baseline to end of study decreased over time for overall (8.9-2.2), major (0.7-0.1), minor (8.2-2.2) and nocturnal (2.9-0.5) episodes. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, in the type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who were poorly controlled on BHI, glycaemia improved when transferred to BIAsp30, and a lower incidence or rate of hypoglycaemia was observed in these patients.

Effects of treatments by calcium and sex hormones on vertebral fracturing in osteoporosis.

Lateral radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine were taken periodically in 49 patients with osteoporosis. Thirty patients were postmenopausal, and 19 nonmenopausal with osteoporosis due to steroids, male hypogonadism, alcoholism, thyrotoxicosis or unknown cause. Patients were studied before, during and after treatment with high calcium alone, or with combined calcium and sex steroids. Calcium was given as effervescent calcium lactate gluconate, and sex hormones as oestradiol valerate, testosterone oenanthate, or methenolone oenanthate. A total of 964 films covering 409 patient-years were available for measurement. On each vertebra, deformity due to loss of anterior height was measured and assigned to one of four grades. For the time interval between each consecutive pair of films, a patient's vertebral fracture rate score was calculated and expressed per thousand patient-years. In comparison with the corresponding pretreatment fracture rate score, both the postmenopausal and the nonmenopausal groups who had not received sex hormones previously, failed to show significant changes (p = 0.144; p = 0.017) on high calcium alone during mean periods of 4.3 and 2.8 years respectively. If the first 2 years on high calcium were excluded for the postmenopausal group, they still failed to show a reduction in fracture rate score (observed for a mean period of 5.0 years; p = 0.04). When treated with combined calcium and sex hormones, both postmenopausal and nonmenopausal groups showed a lower fracture rate score of 20 and 207 respectively when compared with the pretreatment levels of 1500 and 1697 (in mean treatment periods of 3.2 and 4.4 years; p less than 0.001 in each case). When given high-dose calcium alone, but after treatment with sex hormones as well, the postmenopausal group showed no change in fracture rate score from pretreatment (in a mean of 3.1 years; p = 0.069); however the nonmenopausal group still showed a significant reduction in fracture rate score from 1697 to 42 over a mean period of 2.3 years (p = 0.001). The postmenopausal group, after stopping all treatment, showed a higher fracture rate score of 1286 (in a mean of 2.6 years) than did those on combined calcium and sex hormones, in whom the fracture rate score was 20 (in a mean of 3.2 years; p = 0.008). A subgroup of 11 patients with osteoporosis of both the menopausal and nonmenopausal types, had data both before (in a mean of 5.5 years) and during (for a mean of 2.5 years) treatment with calcium alone; the fracture rate scores were 1473 and 918 (p = 0.247).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)