ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the degree of nasal tip rotation three months after rhinoplasty using columellar strut graft. METHODS: Using photographs of 25 patients who underwent rhinoplasty, we prospectively analyzed nasal tip rotation before, during, and after three months of the surgery. Columellar strut graft was used for all patients for tip support. Standardized left profile images were taken. For evaluation of tip rotation, the nasolabial angle was measured. The results were statistically compared, and a p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean preoperative nasolabial angle (NLA) for the entire group was 91.44°, and the directly postoperative angle measured 108.84°. The mean of postoperative nasolabial angles measured at three-month follow-up was 97.2°. The preoperative, directly postoperative, and three-month postoperative nasolabial angles were all recorded. CONCLUSION: Considering the results of this study, a postoperative nasolabial angle is increased compared to preoperative angle. However, an occasional dropping of the angle might be seen in following months, which can be linked to several factors.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Injuries pose a significant burden on population health of Saudi Arabia. Even in nonfatal injuries, the burden varies from temporary to permanent disabilities. Health outcomes following injuries can vary, and predictors of recovery from disability are not well understood. In the Kingdom, family values and cohesion can differ from other countries due to several factors, including religious beliefs and cultural traditions. Learning about predictors of injury recovery can improve prevention as well as planning for rehabilitation programs. Therefore, the study aims to evaluate the association between family cohesion and recovery following blunt injuries. METHODS: This prospective study included 249 patients who were hospitalized for at least 1 day following blunt trauma in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. Adult patients were interviewed twice: initially during admission, and a second interview via the phone 3 months after discharge. Baseline information included: demographics, injury characteristics, the five dimensions EQ-5D and family support scale. The follow-up interview captured only EQ-5D. Suboptimal family cohesion was defined as any issue with the relationship with parents, spouse, or siblings. Any disability was defined as a reported limitation in one or more domains of the EQ-5D scale. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between family cohesion and recovery at 3 months. RESULTS: Of the overall sample, 169 (67.8%) responded to the second interview, and three patients passed away. About 95.2% of patients reported disabilities at baseline, while 88.1% continued to report disabilities after 3 months. Forty patients (16.1%) reported suboptimal family cohesion. Of these patients, 37(94.87%) were in pain, 33(82.5%) reported problems with usual activities, 32(80%) faced problems with self-care, 32 (80%) patients had difficulty in mobility, and 23(57.5%) were depressed. Multivariable regression suggested that patients with suboptimal family cohesion were less likely to recover from disabilities. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of any disability 3 months after discharge is striking. This study suggests that health outcomes after blunt trauma are affected by the strength of the patient's family cohesion. More research is needed to identify effective ways through which the provision of social support can reduce short term disability after trauma.
