Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Mexican Lupus Patients Using the LupusQol.

INTRODUCTION: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is affected by numerous clinical variables, including disease activity, damage, fibromyalgia, depression and anxiety. However, these associations have not yet been described in Mexican patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between disease activity, damage, depression and fibromyalgia and HRQOL measured by the LupusQoL-instrument in Mexican patients with SLE. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in women fulfilling the 1997 ACR classification criteria for SLE. HRQOL was evaluated using a disease-specific instrument for SLE, the LupusQoL (validated for the Spanish-speaking population). Patients were evaluated clinically to determine the degree of disease activity and damage using the Mexican Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (Mex-SLEDAI) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics-Damage Index (SLICC), respectively. Fibromyalgia and depression were assessed using the ACR criteria and the CES-D scale, respectively. The relationship between HRQOL and these variables was measured using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 138 women with SLE, age 40.3±11 years, disease duration 8.8±6.4 years, with disease activity in 51.4%, depression in 50%, damage in 43% and fibromyalgia in 19.6% were included. Poorer HRQOL correlated with depression (r = -0.61; p< 0.005), fibromyalgia (r = -0.42; p< 0.005), disease activity (r = -0.37; p < 0.005) and damage (r = -0.31; p < 0.005). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, damage (ß = -3.756, p<0.005), fibromyalgia (ß = -0.920, p<0.005), depression (ß = -0.911, p<0.005) and disease activity (ß = -0.911, p<0.005) were associated with poor HRQOL. CONCLUSION: SLE disease activity, damage, fibromyalgia and depression were associated with poor HRQOL in our sample of Mexican SLE patients.

Hip fracture registries: utility, description, and comparison.

Hip fractures (HF) are prevalent and involve high morbidity and mortality so improving their management is important. HF registries are a good way to improve knowledge about this condition and its quality of care, while at the same time reducing clinical variability, optimizing efficiency, improving outcomes, and reducing costs. INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures (HF) are a prevalent fragility fracture secondary to osteoporosis that involves high morbidity and mortality. They are low-impact fractures, resulting from a fall from a standing or sitting height. Despite numerous Clinical Practice Guidelines that establish uniform recommendations for their care, great variability persists regarding clinical and healthcare outcomes. Fracture registries can help detect deficits and establish measures to improve care. The objective of this work is to analyze the contents that a HF registry should have and to compare the characteristics of some national HF registries. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on several national hip fracture registries, and those that contain relevant information on the variables and their outcomes were selected. RESULTS: The selected HF registries were compared using the parameters they measure as well as the outcomes in the different countries. The variables collected in the majority of the databases and those that give useful information are as follows: sociodemographic variables (age, sex, place of residence), clinical variables (function before and after HF, anesthesia risk as measured by the ASA score, type of fracture, type of surgery and anesthesia, and in-hospital and 1-month mortality), and healthcare variables (pre-operative and overall stay, presence of collaboration with orthogeriatrics or with any clinician in addition to the surgeon, secondary prevention of new fractures by assessing the fall risk, and need for osteoporosis treatment). CONCLUSION: The recording of HF cases in different countries improves knowledge about handling this condition and its quality of care, while at the same time reducing clinical variability, optimizing efficiency, improving outcomes, and reducing costs. The debate on the variables that should be recorded is timely, such as organizing how to collect each measurement, and even trying to unify the national and international registries or using a current proposal such as the one from the Fragility Fracture Network.

Tratamiento del dolor en el anciano: opioides y adyuvantes / Drug treatment invasive joint in osteoarthritis

En pacientes seleccionados, los opioides pueden proporcionar una adecuada analgesia en el marco de un abordaje integral. Se ha revisado la utilización de opioides fuertes en ancianos con dolor oncológico o no oncológico. Se ha demostrado eficacia en dolor músculo-esquelético a corto plazo y algunos tipos de dolor neuropático. No obstante, no se dispone de datos sobre eficacia y seguridad a largo plazo. Aunque los antidepresivos tricíclicos son eficaces para el dolor neuropático, sus efectos anticolinérgicos suponen un problema para el anciano. Antiepilépticos como gabapentina y pregabalina son eficaces para el dolor neuropático y mejor tolerados. La administración tópica de algunos fármacos mejora la tolerabilidad de los mismos (AU)

There is a small number of primary studies relating to opioid use in older people. In carefully selected and monitored patients, opioids may provide effective pain relief as part of comprehensive pain management strategy. Use of strong opioids in the management of chronic, severe cancer and non-cancer pain in older people has been reviewed. Studies have demonstrated short-term efficacy in persistent musculoskeletal pain and various neuropathic pains. However, longer-term efficacy and safety data are lacking. Some adjuvant drugs should be considered for older people with neuropathic. Although tricyclic antidepressants have good efficacy, anticholinergic side effects are often problematic for older people. Anti-epileptic drugs such asgabapentin or pregabalin, are effective for neuropathic pain and are probably better tolerated. Topical administration may have improved tolerability than other routes of administration and may be preferable for elderly (AU)

Tratamiento del dolor en el anciano: analgésicos no opioides / Management of pain in older people: nonopioid analgesic

Las patologías que producen dolor son frecuentes en el anciano. Como consecuencia, el uso de fármacos es muy prevalente en esta población. Con frecuencia se prescriben fármacos que no tienen suficiente evidencia en ancianos. Los cambios fisiológicos que ocurren con la edad en la distribución, metabolismo y eliminación pueden afectar a la farmacoterapia del anciano. Cuando se selecciona un analgésico, se debe tener en cuenta la comorbilidad y la medicación concomitante. Paracetamol y antiinflamatorios no esteroideos son los analgésicos no opioides más utilizados. Estos fármacos deben manejarse con cautela, conociendo sus características y el riesgo de efectos adversos (AU)

Painful conditions affect older adults. Consequently, there is a high prevalence of medication use among this population. Drugs without a strong evidence base and outside of recommendations are too often prescribed for elderly. Age-related physiological changes in distribution, metabolism, and elimination often alter the effects of pharmacotherapies in older adults. Comorbidities and concomitant medication should be considered when selecting an analgesic and dose regimen. Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used nonopioid analgesics. Caution should be exercised with these drugs in elderly (AU)

Valoración del dolor en el anciano / Assessment of pain in the elderly

Un porcentaje variable entre el 50 al 80% de los mayores de 65 años sufren dolor. Según los datos epidemiológicos el dolor aumenta en pacientes ancianos y frágiles. La prevalencia de pluripatología, deterioro funcional y fragilidad aumenta con la edad. Las barreras que existen por parte de pacientes, sanitarios y administraciones en cuanto a los tratamientos farmacológicos dificultan el adecuado control del dolor. La evaluación y determinación de la causa del dolor es la clave para conseguir su control. Su evaluación debe incluir historia clínica, exploración, test diagnósticos y algunas escalas. La elección del instrumento depende del nivel cognitivo, visual, auditivo y capacidad comunicativa de cada paciente (AU)

Pain is suffered by 50-80% of the population older than 65. Epidemiological data suggests increasing prevalence of chronic pain and frailty with advancing age. Elderly patients are more likely to have multiple chronic health pathologies, declining function and frailty. The barriers present for patients, providers and health systems also negatively impact effective pain control. Pain assessment and determination of its mechanism is the key to optimal pain control. Pain can be rated using a medical history, physical examination, diagnostic test and some scales. Choices of pain measurement tools are dependent upon the patient´s cognitive, visual, auditory and communicative status (AU)

[Results and complications of pertrochanteric hip fractures using an intramedullary nail with a helical blade (proximal femoral nail antirotation) in 200 patients]. / Resultados y complicaciones de la osteosíntesis de fracturas pertrocantéreas de fémur mediante clavo endomedular con espiral cefálica (clavo femoral proximal antirrotación) en 200 pacientes.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the surgical management, outcome and complications in patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA nail. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted on 200 patients treated consecutively between April 2010 and February 2012. Radiological assessments were performed before and after the surgery, and during the follow-up (fracture reduction, blade position, consolidation or collapse signs). A clinical evaluation was performed as regards walking capabilities. The results were compared with those of a previous study on 700 patients treated with gamma 3 and TFN nails. RESULTS: The blade position was centre-centre in 64% of patients, and decreased to 53% in the mechanical complications group. Tip-apex distance was less than 25mm in 91.5%. The average hospital stay was 9.17 days, with a mean post-surgery stay of 5.95 days. Complications (7.5%): 2 cut out (1%), one cut through (0.5%), 4 cases of helical blade sliding (2%), one failure in distal locking procedure (0.5%), 2 cases with painful fasciae latae (1%), one union delay (0.5%), 2 cases of non-union with hardware failure (1%), one case of intense bleeding related to distal locking of the nail (0.5%), and one case of avascular necrosis (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The PFNA helical blade system seems to reduce the incidence of cut out and cut through in osteoporotic bone. Blade position was one of the main parameters associated with mechanical complications.

Resultados y complicaciones de la osteosíntesis de fracturas pertrocantéreas de fémur mediante clavo endomedular con espiral cefálica (clavo femoral proximal antirrotación) en 200 pacientes / Results and complications of pertrochanteric hip fractures using an intramedullary nail with a helical blade (proximal femoral nail antirotation) in 200 patients

Objetivos. Evaluación del manejo quirúrgico, evolución y complicaciones de pacientes afectados por fractura pertrocantérea de cadera tratados mediante enclavado PFNA. Material y método. Revisión retrospectiva de 200 pacientes intervenidos entre abril de 2010 y febrero de 2012 de forma consecutiva. Se realiza evaluación radiográfica preoperatoria, postoperatoria y durante el seguimiento (reducción de la fractura, posición de la espiral, consolidación o signos de colapso). La evaluación clínica se realizó en función de la autonomía para la marcha. Se comparan los resultados obtenidos con estudio previo, sobre muestra de 700 pacientes y enclavado gamma 3 y TFN. Resultados. La posición de la espiral es centro-centro en el 64% de los pacientes, que disminuye al 53% en el grupo de las complicaciones mecánicas, siendo la distancia punta-vértice menor a 25 mm en el 91,5% de los casos. La estancia hospitalaria media se sitúa en 9,17 días con una estancia media postintervención de 5,95 días. Las complicaciones (7,5%) fueron: 2 casos de cut out (1%), uno de cut through (0,5%), 4 casos de efecto telescopaje (2%), un fallo en el encerrojado distal (0,5%), 2 casos de molestias en la fascia lata (1%), un retardo en la consolidación (0,5%), 2 seudoartrosis que condicionaron la rotura del dispositivo (1%), un caso de sangrado relativo al clavo (0,5%) y un caso de necrosis avascular (0,5%). Conclusiones. El sistema de espiral cefálica PFNA parece reducir la incidencia de cut out y cut through en el hueso osteoporótico. La posición de la espiral supone uno de los principales parámetros relacionados con las complicaciones mecánicas (AU)

Objectives. Evaluation of the surgical management, outcome and complications in patients with pertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA nail. Material and method. A retrospective study was conducted on 200 patients treated consecutively between April 2010 and February 2012. Radiological assessments were performed before and after the surgery, and during the follow-up (fracture reduction, blade position, consolidation or collapse signs). A clinical evaluation was performed as regards walking capabilities. The results were compared with those of a previous study on 700 patients treated with gamma 3 and TFN nails. Results. The blade position was centre-centre in 64% of patients, and decreased to 53% in the mechanical complications group. Tip-apex distance was less than 25 mm in 91.5%. The average hospital stay was 9.17 days, with a mean post-surgery stay of 5.95 days. Complications (7.5%): 2 cut out (1%), one cut through (0.5%), 4 cases of helical blade sliding (2%), one failure in distal locking procedure (0.5%), 2 cases with painful fasciae latae (1%), one union delay (0.5%), 2 cases of non-union with hardware failure (1%), one case of intense bleeding related to distal locking of the nail (0.5%), and one case of avascular necrosis (0.5%). Conclusions. The PFNA helical blade system seems to reduce the incidence of cut out and cut through in osteoporotic bone. Blade position was one of the main parameters associated with mechanical complications (AU)

Health related quality of life in Mexican women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a descriptive study using SF-36 and LupusQoL(C).

The LupusQoL© questionnaire is a disease-specific health related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument for adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a generic instrument that captures the physical, psychological, and social impact. We conducted a descriptive study of women aged ≥ 18 years attending our Lupus Clinic. HRQOL was assessed by applying the LupusQoL© and SF-36. Lupus activity was measured using the Mexican Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (Mex-SLEDAI) and chronic damage using the Systemic Lupus Collaborative Clinics Damage Index (SDI). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test and Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient. A total of 127 patients were included with a mean age of 40.5 ± 12.6 years. The mean disease duration was 8.2 ± 5.6 years, the mean disease activity score was 2.4 ± 3.0, and the mean SDI score 0.77 ± 1.06. The mean SF-36 score was 58.1 ± 21.1 and the mean LupusQoL© score was 69 ± 22.7. The correlation between global scores of the SF-36 and LupusQoL© was rho = 0.73 (p < 0.001). The correlation between lupus disease activity and the SF-36 and the LupusQoL© was -0.26 (p = 0.003) and -0.25 (p = 0.004), respectively. The correlation between the SDI and the SF-36 and the LupusQoL© was -0.28 (p = 0.001) and -0.38 (p < 0.0001), respectively. In conclusions: both LupusQoL© and SF-36 were useful instruments in assessing HRQOL in Mexican lupus female patients. The usefulness of the LupusQoL© should be evaluated in lupus patients with moderate to severe disease activity.