Insect population control using a dominant, repressible, lethal genetic system.

A major modification to the sterile insect technique is described, in which transgenic insects homozygous for a dominant, repressible, female-specific lethal gene system are used. We demonstrate two methods that give the required genetic characteristics in an otherwise wild-type genetic background. The first system uses a sex-specific promoter or enhancer to drive the expression of a repressible transcription factor, which in turn controls the expression of a toxic gene product. The second system uses non-sex-specific expression of the repressible transcription factor to regulate a selectively lethal gene product. Both methods work efficiently in Drosophila melanogaster, and we expect these principles to be widely applicable to more economically important organisms.

Transcriptional and post-transcriptional control mechanisms coordinate the onset of spermatid differentiation with meiosis I in Drosophila.

The aly, can, mia and sa genes of Drosophila are essential in males both for the G2-meiosis I transition and for onset of spermatid differentiation. Function of all four genes is required for transcription in primary spermatocytes of a suite of spermatid differentiation genes. aly is also required for transcription of the cell cycle control genes cyclin B and twine in primary spermatocytes. In contrast can, mia and sa are required for accumulation of twine protein but not twine transcript. We propose that the can, mia and sa gene products act together or in a pathway to turn on transcription of spermatid differentiation genes, and that aly acts upstream of can, mia and sa to regulate spermatid differentiation. We also propose that control of translation or protein stability regulates entry into the first meiotic division. We suggest that a gene or genes transcribed under the control of can, mia and sa allow(s) accumulation of twine protein, thus coordinating meiotic division with onset of spermatid differentiation.

Complete reversions of a gypsy retrotransposon-induced cut locus mutation in Drosophila melanogaster involving jockey transposon insertions and flanking gypsy sequence deletions.

We have analysed the structures of three phenotypic revertant alleles of a gypsy retrotransposon-induced mutation at the cut locus of Drosophila melanogaster. All three revertants are associated with the insertion of jockey transposons into a common region of gypsy. Two of these alleles are complete reversions to wild type. One complete revertant (ct+D) is derived from a third allele, a partial revertant (ctMRpD) by a deletion of part of the gypsy sequence flanking the jockey transposon. Sequence differences between the jockey elements in ctMRpD and ct+D suggest that this deletion may have been created by the insertion of a second jockey near to the first, followed by recombinational excision of a composite jockey and the region between the two genetic elements. The other complete revertant also carries a deletion of gypsy DNA flanking the jockey insertion. The deleted regions of both complete revertants and the target region for all the jockey insertions contain a repeated sequence that resembles a transcriptional enhancer. The strength of the cut phenotype in these mutants correlates with the proportion of this region remaining near the gypsy transcriptional start site, suggesting that the jockey insertions relieve the gypsy-induced mutation at cut by interfering with a region which is required for the transcriptional competence of gypsy.

Instability in the ctMR2 strain of Drosophila melanogaster: role of P element functions and structure of revertants.

Simultaneous multiple transpositions and long-term genetic instability have been described in the ctMR2 strain of Drosophila melanogaster and its derivatives. This strain originated from a cross that was dysgenic in the P-M system. While spontaneous instability declined over 2 years, instability has been reactivated by backcross to the progenitor P element bearing strain MRh12/Cy. We show here using germline transformation that active P factor alone cannot mimic the effect of this cross, suggesting that MRh12/Cy contains some other activator. In addition, we have observed that ct+ exceptional progeny arise in the F1 as well as the F2 generations. Molecular analysis of X chromosomes from some ct+ progeny indicates that phenotypic reversion of the ct mutation can arise through two unrelated mechanisms.