Impact of COVID-19 infection on the dialysis population prospective, observational, nationwide study.

INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection but infection rates vary. Our objectives are to describe COVID-19 positive HD patients' characteristics, infection rates, and factors associated with mortality in HD COVID-19 cases in Kuwait. METHODS: Data on demographics, comorbidities, and treatments received, as well as mortality for HD patients admitted to hospitals for COVID-19, from 1/March to 31/July 2020, prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 141 infected HD patients were admitted (Mean age 58 ± 16.1; Males 56%), representing 7% of the total HD population and 0.2% of all COVID-19 cases during the study period. Of those 141 infected HD patients, 27 (19%) died, and this represents 6% of total COVID-19-related mortality and 27% of the total HD mortality. In contrast, total covid-19-related mortality of all positive cases was only 0.7%, and total HD mortality during the study period was only 5%. COVID-19-positive HD patients who died were older and 59% were males. However, the differences were not statistically significant. Of the 61 infected HD patients who needed to be switched to continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), 34% died, and of the 29 infected HD patients who needed admission to intensive care, 65% died. CONCLUSION: HD population represents a small fraction of the total population; however, positive HD COVID-19 cases represent a sizable proportion of COVID-19 cases and a significant percentage of total COVID-19-related mortality, and total HD mortality.

Safety of Intravenous Iron in CKD Stage 3-5 Patients Not on Dialysis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Iron deficiency is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients not on dialysis (ND). Restoring depleted iron stores through intravenous (IV) route is faster and associated with less side effects. There is conflicting data regarding intravenous iron use and its impact on clinical outcomes in this population. Objective: This study aims at evaluating any negative clinical impact associated with IV iron use in CKD patients at stages (3-5) before dialysis. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting and Population: Chart analysis of ND CKD 3-5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) patients who received IV iron between January 2013 and January 2018 in 3 major hospitals in Kuwait. Methods: Outcomes analyzed were rates of all-cause hospitalizations, infection-related hospitalizations, mortality rates, and eGFR decline over 12 months after IV iron infusion in this population divided into 3 groups according to CKD stage. Results: A total of 738 patients were included in our analysis. Mean initial hemoglobin concentration was 111.5 ± 15.0 g/L in group 1 (CKD 3: eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2), 103.6 ± 17.7 g/L in group 2 (CKD 4: eGFR 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2), and 99.4 ± 14.5 g/L in group 3 (CKD 5: eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 but not on dialysis). All-cause hospitalization and infection-related hospitalization were more common among group 3 subjects (adjusted odds ratio =2.12 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.32-3.41] and 2.02 [95% CI: 1.15-3.55]), respectively. No deaths occurred during 12 months of follow-up. Limitations: Lack of control group, retrospective study. Conclusion: Intravenous iron use in CKD 3-5 ND is generally safe. Higher hospitalization rates in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min are possibly associated with lower baseline hemoglobin, lower baseline eGFR, and higher comorbidity burden, and not related to iron infusion.

Contexte: La carence en fer est fréquente chez les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) qui ne sont pas sous dialyse (ND). Le rétablissement des réserves de fer par voie intraveineuse (IV) est plus rapide et associé à moins d'effets secondaires. Les données sur l'administration du fer par intraveineuse et son incidence sur les résultats cliniques dans cette population demeurent toutefois contradictoires. Objectif: Cette étude vise à évaluer tout effet clinique négatif associé à l'administration de fer IV chez les patients atteints d'IRC de stade 3 à 5 avant la dialyse. Type d'étude: Examen rétrospectif des dossiers médicaux. Cadre et population: Analyse des dossiers médicaux de patients atteints d'IRC de stade 3 à 5 (DFGe < 60 ml/min/1,73 m2) ND ayant reçu du fer IV entre janvier 2013 et janvier 2018 dans trois grands hôpitaux du Koweït. Méthodologie: Les taux d'hospitalisations toutes causes confondues et d'hospitalisations liées à une infection, le taux de mortalité et le déclin du DFGe ont été mesurés sur une période de 12 mois après la perfusion de fer. La population était divisée en trois groupes selon le stade de l'IRC. Résultats: L'analyse porte sur un total de 738 patients. La concentration initiale moyenne d'hémoglobine était de 111,5 ± 15,0 g/L dans le groupe IRC 3 (DFGe: 30-59 ml/min/1,73 m2), de 103,6 ± 17,7 g/L dans le groupe IRC 4 (DFGe: 15-29 ml/min/1,73 m2) et de 99,4 ± 14,5 g/L dans le groupe IRC 5 (DFGe < 15 ml/min/1,73 m2 sans dialyse). Les hospitalisations toutes causes confondues et les hospitalisations liées à une infection étaient plus fréquentes chez les sujets du groupe IRC 3 (rapport de cotes ajusté = 2,12 [IC à 95 %: 1,32-3,41] et 2,02 [IC 95 %: 1,15-3,55] respectivement). Aucun décès n'est survenu pendant les 12 mois de suivi. Limites: Absence de groupe témoin, étude rétrospective. Conclusion: L'administration de fer IV chez les patients atteints d'IRC de stade 3 à 5 ND est généralement sûre. Le taux d'hospitalisation plus élevé observé chez les patients présentant un DFGe < 30 ml/min est probablement attribuable à des mesures initiales plus faibles pour l'hémoglobine et le DFGe, de même qu'à une charge de comorbidité plus élevée, plutôt qu'à la perfusion de fer.

Response to and outcomes of the Pfizer BNT162B2 vaccine in hemodialysis patients-A prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 infection is associated with high mortality among hemodialysis patients. Standard vaccine response is generally lower among these patients. The adequate antibody titer response and the outcome of COVID-19 vaccine responders versus non-responders are unknown. METHODS: Hemodialysis patients on maintenance hemodialysis who have received two doses of Pfizer BNT162B2 vaccine were studied. Antibody response was tested after 14 days of the second dose. LIAISON SARS-CoV2 S1/S2 IgG test by DiaSorin (Italy) was used to assess antibody response. Patients were followed between 3 and 7 months after vaccination for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death related to COVID-19. FINDINGS: A total of 138 patients received two doses of Pfizer BNT162B2 vaccine. One hundred and twenty-seven patients had adequate response to the vaccine with IgG level ≥ 15 AU/ml versus 11 patients had poor response with IgG level ≤ 15 AU/ml. The response was 92% (127/138). Patient with history of prior COVID-19 infection had higher antibody titer mean of 339 ± 113 versus 157 ± 140 for patient with no prior history of COVID-19. Seven patients in both groups had COVID-19 infection post vaccine. Among the responders, five patients had COIVD-19 infection and two were hospitalized. These two patients had lower antibody titer of 23.9 and 75.2 AU/ml. In comparison, three patients who were not hospitalized had higher antibody titer 96.3, 118, and 319 AU/ml, respectively. In the non-responders one patient was hospitalized and one death occurred with rate of infection of 18%. DISCUSSION: Seropositive patients with low antibody titer might be associated with worse outcome among responders. The ideal antibody titer level among dialysis patient is not known. Also, prior COVID-19 infection is associated with higher response to vaccine with higher antibody titer. All non-responders did not have prior COVID-19 infection. More research is required to further evaluated protective antibody titer.

Use of Rituximab as an Off-Label Medication in Glomerular Diseases: Clinical Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review the use rituximab (RTX) and outcomes in immune-mediated glomerular diseases (glomerulonephritis [GN]) and to compare it to the established literature. METHODS: Adult GN patients who received RTX between January 2014 and January 2018 in three public hospitals were reviewed. Membranous nephropathy (MN) and minimal change disease (MCD) were considered diseases with the literature supporting RTX use. Lupus nephritis (LN), primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (1o FSGS), IgA nephropathy, IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), and C3GN had insufficient literature support for RTX use. Clinical remission was assessed 6 months after receiving RTX. RESULTS: A total of 61 cases were analyzed. RTX was an add-on therapy in 87%. The remission rate was 95% in the MCD and MN versus 56% in the off-label group (p = 0.002). LN patients had a mean initial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 69 mL/min. All class III LN achieved remission, and 11 of 21 class IV achieved remission. The mean initial eGFR for 1o FSGS was 33 mL/min, and it did not improve, and only 2 of 5 had partial resolution of proteinuria. Proteinuria improved in 3 of 5 IgG4-RD cases with eGFR stabilization but failed to improve in C3GN cases with eGFR deterioration. Vasculitis cases (6 ANCA-associated vasculitis and 2 IgA vasculitis) were analyzed separately. Remission was achieved in only 2 ANCA-associated vasculitis cases, and none in IgA vasculitis cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of RTX in resistant MCD and MN. RTX showed success in LN and IgG4-RD but not FSGS or C3GN. The small number of cases of vasculitis does not allow drawing a conclusion on RTX effectiveness.

Renal Data from the Arab World Dialysis in Kuwait: 2013-2019.

The total number of end-stage kidney disease patients treated with dialysis in 2019 in Kuwait was 2230, with a 6% increase from the year before. Dialysis prevalence was 465 per million population (PMP) and dialysis incidence was100 PMP. Kuwaiti nationals represented 70% of the dialysis population and males represented 52%. Of the same population, 59% had diabetes. Hepatitis C virus affected <4% and hepatitis B virus affected <2% of the dialysis population. The annual mortality rate was stable at around 12%. Hemodialysis (HD) share was 89%, with 48% of HD patients getting HD via catheter, 54% on hemodiafiltration (HDF), and 50% dialyzing against a calcium bath of 1.75. Patients getting <3 times/week of HD constituted 10% and patients spending <3.5 h/session constituted 11%. We had only 20 dialysis patients under the age of 12 years (12 on HD). The major challenges faced included poor peritoneal dialysis penetration, the unacceptable high rates of catheters as primary HD vascular access, partly due to lack of chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinics and lack of vascular access coordinators, and the unexplained high rates of use of calcium bath of 1.75. There is also a need for a national campaign for early detection and prevention of CKD to reduce rates of end-stage renal disease.