ABSTRACT
Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots like Google's Bard, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and Microsoft's Bing Chatbot into academic and professional domains, including cardiology, has been rapidly evolving. Their application in educational and research frameworks, however, raises questions about their efficacy, particularly in specialized fields like cardiology. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge depth and accuracy of these AI chatbots in cardiology using a multiple-choice question (MCQ) format. Methods: The study was conducted as an exploratory, cross-sectional study in November 2023 on a bank of 100 MCQs covering various cardiology topics that was created from authoritative textbooks and question banks. These MCQs were then used to assess the knowledge level of Google's Bard, Microsoft Bing, and ChatGPT 4.0. Each question was entered manually into the chatbots, ensuring no memory retention bias. Results: The study found that ChatGPT 4.0 demonstrated the highest knowledge score in cardiology, with 87% accuracy, followed by Bing at 60% and Bard at 46%. The performance varied across different cardiology subtopics, with ChatGPT consistently outperforming the others. Notably, the study revealed significant differences in the proficiency of these chatbots in specific cardiology domains. Conclusion: This study highlights a spectrum of efficacy among AI chatbots in disseminating cardiology knowledge. ChatGPT 4.0 emerged as a potential auxiliary educational resource in cardiology, surpassing traditional learning methods in some aspects. However, the variability in performance among these AI systems underscores the need for cautious evaluation and continuous improvement, especially for chatbots like Bard, to ensure reliability and accuracy in medical knowledge dissemination.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are a global issue facing the world. In a conservative community like Saudi Arabia, discussing such matters is considered taboo, and this might impact the awareness of STDs. Therefore, this study aims to determine if gender, level of education, and university affiliation influence the level of awareness of STDs. METHODS: This research is a cross-sectional study that involves 389 students who are studying at King Saud University (KSU) and Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMAMU). Twenty-six questions were gathered from a previous study and implemented into the questionnaire and were validated after. RESULTS: Overall, awareness about STDs was poor. Females scored higher than male participants (7.9 ± 3.3 vs. 7.1 ± 3.2, p < 0.017) respectively. Interestingly, undergraduates scored higher than postgraduates (4.7 ± 3.7 vs. 3.7 ± 3.3, p < 0.029). For the university, KSU students scored higher than their counterparts did at IMAMU (10.4 ± 5.7 vs. 8.9 ± 5.5, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Female participants have shown a higher level of STD awareness than males, but the overall awareness is still extremely low. However, KSU scored higher than IMAMU As a result, appropriate education and promotion efforts about STDs must be implemented based on gender and education level.
