ABSTRACT
Introduction This study proposes the utility of an infrared auto refractometer for meibography and compares miebographs obtained by an auto refractometer to meibographs obtained by a designated meibography machine. Methods A prospective observational comparative study of meibographs of patients with clinical signs of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) using a designated meibography machine and an infrared auto refractometer. Five masked, experienced interpreters graded the images of the two machines. The Kappa test was used to calculate Intra-rater and inter-rater agreements between the meibography machine and automated refractor grading of meibomian gland dysfunction. Results High-quality photos of all 30 eyes delineating the meibomian glands (MG) were successfully obtained with both the meibography machine and the autorefractor. Both methods had a good intra-rater agreement (κ= 0.667 to 0.784, average 0.738). Poor to fair interrater agreement was noticed in the grading of autorefractor images (k= -0.030 to 0.343, average 0.092) and poor to moderate agreements between investigators for meibography machine images (K= -0.016 to 0.420, average 0.173). Conclusion A commercially available auto refractometer could capture high-quality non-contact IR digital meibographs.
