A New Hybrid Possibilistic-Probabilistic Decision-Making Scheme for Classification.

Uncertainty is at the heart of decision-making processes in most real-world applications. Uncertainty can be broadly categorized into two types: aleatory and epistemic. Aleatory uncertainty describes the variability in the physical system where sensors provide information (hard) of a probabilistic type. Epistemic uncertainty appears when the information is incomplete or vague such as judgments or human expert appreciations in linguistic form. Linguistic information (soft) typically introduces a possibilistic type of uncertainty. This paper is concerned with the problem of classification where the available information, concerning the observed features, may be of a probabilistic nature for some features, and of a possibilistic nature for some others. In this configuration, most encountered studies transform one of the two information types into the other form, and then apply either classical Bayesian-based or possibilistic-based decision-making criteria. In this paper, a new hybrid decision-making scheme is proposed for classification when hard and soft information sources are present. A new Possibilistic Maximum Likelihood (PML) criterion is introduced to improve classification rates compared to a classical approach using only information from hard sources. The proposed PML allows to jointly exploit both probabilistic and possibilistic sources within the same probabilistic decision-making framework, without imposing to convert the possibilistic sources into probabilistic ones, and vice versa.

Iterative Refinement of Possibility Distributions by Learning for Pixel-Based Classification.

This paper proposes an approach referred as: iterative refinement of possibility distributions by learning (IRPDL) for pixel-based image classification. The IRPDL approach is based on the use of possibilistic reasoning concepts exploiting expert knowledge sources as well as ground possibilistic seeds learning. The set of seeds is constructed by incrementally updating and refining the possibility distributions. Synthetic images as well as real images from the RIDER Breast MRI database are being used to evaluate the IRPDL performance. Its performance is compared with three relevant reference methods: region growing, semi-supervised fuzzy pattern matching, and Markov random fields. The IRDPL performance (in terms of recognition rate, 87.3%) is close to the Markovian method (88.8%) that is considered to be the reference in pixel-based image classification. IRPDL outperforms the other two methods, respectively, at the recognition rates of 83.9% and 84.7%. In addition, the proposed IRPDL requires fewer parameters for the mathematical representation and presents a reduced computational complexity.