Computational prediction of the effects of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in human DNA repair genes.

Non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) represent common genetic variation that alters encoded amino acids in proteins. All nsSNPs may potentially affect the structure or function of expressed proteins and could therefore have an impact on complex diseases. In an effort to evaluate the phenotypic effect of all known nsSNPs in human DNA repair genes, we have characterized each polymorphism in terms of different functional properties. The properties are computed based on amino acid characteristics (e.g. residue volume change); position-specific phylogenetic information from multiple sequence alignments and from prediction programs such as SIFT (Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant) and PolyPhen (Polymorphism Phenotyping). We provide a comprehensive, updated list of all validated nsSNPs from dbSNP (public database of human single nucleotide polymorphisms at National Center for Biotechnology Information, USA) located in human DNA repair genes. The list includes repair enzymes, genes associated with response to DNA damage as well as genes implicated with genetic instability or sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. Out of a total of 152 genes involved in DNA repair, 95 had validated nsSNPs in them. The fraction of nsSNPs that had high probability of being functionally significant was predicted to be 29.6% and 30.9%, by SIFT and PolyPhen respectively. The resulting list of annotated nsSNPs is available online (http://dna.uio.no/repairSNP), and is an ongoing project that will continue assessing the function of coding SNPs in human DNA repair genes.

Repair of methyl lesions in DNA and RNA by oxidative demethylation.

It was established several decades ago that it is crucial for all organisms to repair their DNA to maintain genome integrity and numerous proteins are dedicated to this purpose. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that it is also important to prevent and repair lesions in the macromolecules encoded by the DNA, i.e. RNA and protein. Many neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease are associated with the aggregation of defective, misfolded proteins, and several mechanisms exist to prevent such aggregation, both through direct protein repair and through the elimination and repair of faulty or damaged RNAs. A few years ago, it was discovered that the E. coli AlkB protein represented an iron and 2-oxoglutarate dependent oxygenase capable of repairing methyl lesions in DNA by a novel mechanism, termed oxidative demethylation. Furthermore, it was found that both human and bacterial AlkB proteins were able to demethylate lesions also in RNA, thus representing the first example of RNA repair. In the present review, recent findings on the AlkB mechanism, as well as on RNA damage in general, will be discussed.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologues of endonuclease III from Escherichia coli, Ntg1 and Ntg2, are both required for efficient repair of spontaneous and induced oxidative DNA damage in yeast.

Endonuclease III from Escherichia coli is the prototype of a ubiquitous DNA repair enzyme essential for the removal of oxidized pyrimidine base damage. The yeast genome project has revealed the presence of two genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, NTG1 and NTG2, encoding proteins with similarity to endonuclease III. Both contain the highly conserved helix-hairpin-helix motif, whereas only one (Ntg2) harbors the characteristic iron-sulfur cluster of the endonuclease III family. We have characterized these gene functions by mutant and enzyme analysis as well as by gene expression and intracellular localization studies. Targeted gene disruption of NTG1 and NTG2 produced mutants with greatly increased spontaneous and hydrogen peroxide-induced mutation frequency relative to the wild type, and the mutation response was further increased in the double mutant. Both enzymes were found to remove thymine glycol and 2, 6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-N-methylformamidopyrimidine (faPy) residues from DNA with high efficiency. However, on UV-irradiated DNA, saturating concentrations of Ntg2 removed only half of the cytosine photoproducts released by Ntg1. Conversely, 5-hydroxycytosine was removed efficiently only by Ntg2. The enzymes appear to have different reaction modes, as judged from much higher affinity of Ntg2 for damaged DNA and more efficient borhydride trapping of Ntg1 to abasic sites in DNA despite limited DNA binding. Northern blot and promoter fusion analysis showed that NTG1 is inducible by cell exposure to DNA-damaging agents, whereas NTG2 is constitutively expressed. Ntg2 appears to be a nuclear enzyme, whereas Ntg1 was sorted both to the nucleus and to the mitochondria. We conclude that functions of both NTG1 and NTG2 are important for removal of oxidative DNA damage in yeast.

Base excision of oxidative purine and pyrimidine DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a DNA glycosylase with sequence similarity to endonuclease III from Escherichia coli.

One gene locus on chromosome I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a protein (YAB5_YEAST; accession no. P31378) with local sequence similarity to the DNA repair glycosylase endonuclease III from Escherichia coli. We have analyzed the function of this gene, now assigned NTG1 (endonuclease three-like glycosylase 1), by cloning, mutant analysis, and gene expression in E. coli. Targeted gene disruption of NTG1 produces a mutant that is sensitive to H2O2 and menadione, indicating that NTG1 is required for repair of oxidative DNA damage in vivo. Northern blot analysis and expression studies of a NTG1-lacZ gene fusion showed that NTG1 is induced by cell exposure to different DNA damaging agents, particularly menadione, and hence belongs to the DNA damage-inducible regulon in S. cerevisiae. When expressed in E. coli, the NTG1 gene product cleaves plasmid DNA damaged by osmium tetroxide, thus, indicating specificity for thymine glycols in DNA similarly as is the case for EndoIII. However, NTG1 also releases formamidopyrimidines from DNA with high efficiency and, hence, represents a glycosylase with a novel range of substrate recognition. Sequences similar to NTG1 from other eukaryotes, including Caenorhabditis elegans, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and mammals, have recently been entered in the GenBank suggesting the universal presence of NTG1-like genes in higher organisms. S. cerevisiae NTG1 does not have the [4Fe-4S] cluster DNA binding domain characteristic of the other members of this family.

Crystal structure and mutational analysis of human uracil-DNA glycosylase: structural basis for specificity and catalysis.

Crystal structures of the DNA repair enzyme human uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), combined with mutational analysis, reveal the structural basis for the specificity of the enzyme. Within the classic alpha/beta fold of UDG, sequence-conserved residues form a positively charged, active-site groove the width of duplex DNA, at the C-terminal edge of the central four-stranded parallel beta sheet. In the UDG-6-aminouracil complex, uracil binds at the base of the groove within a rigid preformed pocket that confers selectivity for uracil over other bases by shape complementary and by main chain and Asn-204 side chain hydrogen bonds. Main chain nitrogen atoms are positioned to stabilize the oxyanion intermediate generated by His-268 acting via nucleophilic attack or general base mechanisms. Specific binding of uracil flipped out from a DNA duplex provides a structural mechanism for damaged base recognition.

Low incorporation of dUMP by some thermostable DNA polymerases may limit their use in PCR amplifications.

Incorporation of dUMP instead of dTMP is frequently used to control carryover contamination during PCR amplifications. We have tested four thermostable DNA polymerases for their ability to utilize dUTP as a substrate in PCR. Amplification of products in the presence of dUTP instead of dTTP was good with Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase but highly inefficient with three other thermostable DNA polymerases. The latter was due to: (a) lower incorporation of dUMP relative to dTMP, (b) increased proofreading toward dUMP in DNA, (c) relative termination at dUMP residues as verified by sequencing reactions in the presence of dUTP, (d) thermostable dUTPase activity in the commercial enzyme preparation. The last point only applies to Pyrococcus furiosus DNA polymerase. This study demonstrates that various thermostable DNA polymerases utilize dTTP and dUTP with highly different efficiencies and thus the choice of DNA polymerase may be critical for amplification of DNA.